A critique of baby making supermarts: Surrogacy clinics in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love (2012)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores the exploitation of commercial surrogates at the hands of the various stakeholders and agents of the fertility industry in Kishwar Desai’s novel Origins of Love (2012). It begins with a brief description of the advances in the field of infertility treatment and the tailored options of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) for conceiving a child. It then traces the practice of surrogacy in mythology and explores how it is different from present day surrogacy. It further points out why ARTs is preferred over adoption by prospective parents and how this preference has led to the emergence of fertility clinics as the new baby supermarts, from where the parents can ‘buy’ egg, sperm and customised babies. The paper also throws light on how this trend of baby shopping makes fertility clinics operate akin to any other commercial industry and how in the novel Desai has depicted the inherent flaws of this phenomenon of baby shopping. It critically examines the rapid expansion of Reproductive Tourism due to transnational commercial gestational surrogacy and the huge popularity of India as a surrogacy hub, as depicted in Desai’s novel. The paper illustrates how surrogacy not only involves exploitation of women’s reproductive capacity but also encompasses physical, emotional, psychological and economic exploitation. The paper ends with a scrutiny of the blatant violation of medical ethics in the field of ARTs and the potentially dangerous long-term implications that these technological advancements can have on women’s health and the society at large.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Anderson, E. S. (1990). Is Women’s Labor a Commodity. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(1), 71-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265363
Centre for social research (CSR). (2010). Surrogate motherhood – ethical or commercial. https://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/34218/2/Surrogacy-Motherhood-Ethical-or-Commercial-Surat%2CGujraat.pdf
Corea, G. (1985). The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. Harpercollins.
Das, S. S., & Maut, P. (2014). Commercialization of Surrogacy in India: A Critical Analysis.
Desai, K. (2012). Origins of Love. Simon & Schuster.
Ekman, K. E. (2014, August 20). Stop Surrogacy Before It is too Late. Medium. https://medium.com/@IdeasattheHouse/stop-surrogacy-before-it-is-too-late-9910035a63f0
Gupta, J. A. (2006). Towards transnational feminisms: some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806060004
Hynes, H. P. (1989). The recurring silent spring. Pergamon.
Jana, M., & Hammer, A. (2021). Reproductive Work in the Global South: Lived Experiences and Social Relations of Commercial Surrogacy in India. Work, Employment and Society, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017021997370
Joseph, J. (2020). Redefining Motherhood: Problems of Surrogacy in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities (IJELLH), 8(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v8i1.10404
Joseph, N. (2017). The myth of motherhood and the commodification of female body. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 5(3), 66-69. https://www.rjelal.com/5.3.17/65-68%20NIMMY%20JOSEPH.pdf
Karmakar, M., & Parui, A. (2019). ‘These were made-to-order babies’: Reterritorialised Kinship, Neoliberal Eugenics and Artificial Reproductive Technology in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love. Med Humanities, 1-10. doi:10.1136/ medhum-2018-011522
Krolokke, C., Foss, K.A., & Sandoval, J. (2010). The commodification of motherhood: Surrogacy as a matter of choice. In S. Hayden & D. Lynn O’Brien Hallstein (Eds), Contemplating maternity in an era of choice: Explorations into discourses of reproduction (pp. 95–114). Lexington Books.
Malhotra, A., & Malhotra, R. (2016). Surrogacy in India – A law in the Making - Revisited. Universal Law Publishing.
Martin, L. J. (2009). Reproductive tourism in the age of globalization. Globalizations, 6(2), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730802500398
Menon, N. (2012). Seeing like a feminist. Penguin Books.
Merrick, J.C. (1990). Selling Reproductive Rights: Policy issues in surrogate motherhood. Politics and the Life Sciences, 8(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400009709
Nadimpally, S., & Venkatachalam, D. (2016). Marketing Reproduction: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Commercial Surrogacy in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 23(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521515612865
Nasreen, T. [@tasleema nasreen]. (2022, January 22). [tweet] Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/taslimanasreen/status/1484787379173203975?lang=en
Peet, J. L. (2016). A Womb That Is (Not Always) One’s Own. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1103060
Parveen, M. (2019). Subverting the Genre: An Exploration of Kishwar Desai’s Feminist Detective Novels. International Journal of English Language, Literature in Humanities (IJELLH), 7(7), 435-443.
Press Trust of India. “1.3 Lakh for First Pitcher of Holy Water in Odisha Temple.” NDTV.com, NDTV, 9 Apr. 2022, https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/1-3-lakh-for-first-pitcher-of-holy-water-in-odisha-mukteswar-temple-2873358. Accessed 16 December 2022.
Raymond, J. (1993). Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women’s Freedom. Harper San Francisco.
Richards, S.E. (2014). Should A Woman Be Allowed To Hire A Surrogaye Because She fears Preganancy Will Hurt Her Career. Elle. https://www.elle.com/life-love/a14424/birth-rights/
Rothman, B.K. (2004). Motherhood under capitalism. In J. Taylor, L. Layne, & D. F. Wozniak (Eds.), Consuming Motherhood (pp. 19-30). Rutgers University Press.
Rowland, R. (1992). Living laboratories: Women and reproductive technologies. Indiana University Press.
Saravanan, S. (2010). Transnational surrogacy and objectification of gestational mothers. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(16), 26-29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289410067_Transnational_surrogacy_and_objectification_of_gestational_mothers
Singh, J., Khanna, P.K., & Khanna, A. (2015). Consensual Violence against Surrogate Mothers in Kishwar Desai’s The Origins of Love. Paripex- Indian Journal of Research, 4(2), 90-92.
Snider, S. (24 November, 2020). The cost of using a surrogate – and how to pay for it. U.S. News.https://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/family-finance/articles/how-much-surrogacy-costs-and-how-to-pay-for-it
Spar, D. (2005a). The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Harvard Business School Press.
Spar, D. (2005b). For love and money: The political economy of commercial surrogacy. Review of International Political Economy, 12(2), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500105615
Subramaniam, K. (2015). Srimad Bhagavatam. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
Virani, P. (2016). Politics of the Womb: The Perils of Ivf, Surrogacy and Modified Babies. Penguin Random House.
Vora, K. (2009). Indian transnational Surrogacy and commodification of vital energy. Subjectivity, 28(1), 266-78. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.14
Waldby, C., & Cooper, M. (2008). The biopolitics of reproduction: Post-fordist biotechnology and women’s clinical labor. Australian Feminist Studies, 23(35), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164640701816223
Watson, C. (2016). Womb rentals and baby-selling: Does surrogacy undermine the human dignity and rights of the surrogate mother and child? The New Bioethics, 22(3), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2016.1238582
Wright, M. (2006). Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism. Routledge.