A critical evaluation of Edward Said's literary critical concept in culture and imperialism
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to assess the validity of Said's humanistic critique in establishing a comprehensive critical theory that integrates both theoretical and practical aspects. Thus, it clarifies the cognitive frameworks of Edward Said's concept of criticism through an analysis of his interpretation of culture. It clarifies how Said successfully applied the theoretical tenets of humanistic criticism by providing a comprehensive analysis of culture. Said's humanistic criticism transcends merely exposing the deficiencies of contemporary American critical theory, as demonstrated by its arcane professionalization. It aims to deconstruct professionalization, replacing it with critical values that associate critical theory with its context, allowing the intellectual to elucidate the disparities within the interrelated historical experiences. Transforming the frameworks of traditional criticism is both theoretical and practical. The theoretical aspects of Said's concept of criticism emphasize the literary tenets promoted by both classical and contemporary American criticism. Nevertheless, the practical aspects of Said's humanistic critique relate to the intellectual's capacity to transform Saidian theoretical concepts of humanistic criticism from theoretical boundaries to practical application. In other words, how Said could express cognitive frameworks that alter the established intellectual perspectives of his background and society into a more humane perspective, allowing him to reassess modern critical theory.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Arnold, Matthew. "Culture & Anarchy: An essay in political and social criticism and friendship's garland, bein gthe conversations, letters, and opinions of the late Arminius, Baron von Thunder-ten-tronckh." (1903).
Bernal, Martin. Black Athena: The Linguistic Evidence. Vol. 3. Rutgers University Press, 1987.
Barry, Peter. "An introduction to literary and cultural theory." Beginning Theory (1995).
Bové, Paul A. "Hope and Reconciliation: A Review of Edward W. Said." (1993): 266-282.
Dunn, Allen. "THE ETHICS OF" MANSFIELD PARK": MacIntyre, Said, and Social Context." Soundings (1995): 483-500.
Hallward, Peter. "Absolutely Postcolonial: Writing between the Singular and the Specific." Manchester UP (2001).
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Hays, Michael. "Representing Empire: Class, Culture, and the Popular Theatre in the Nineteenth Century." Theatre Journal 47.1 (1995): 65-82.
Imbabi, Do'aa. "A Reading of Edward Said's Critical Concepts,'' Alif 25(2005):55-73
MacKenzie, John M. "Edward Said and the historians." Nineteenth Century Contexts 18.1 (1994): 9-25.
Robbins, Bruce, et al. "Edward Said's culture and imperialism: A symposium." Social text (1994): 1-24.
Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism, London: Chatto & Windus, 1993.
Young, Robert. "Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture, and race." The Canadian Historical Review 78.1 (1997).
Williams, Bernard, ed. Obscenity and film censorship: An abridgement of the Williams report. Cambridge University Press, 2015.