Supervisory roles and influencing factors in enhancing EFL writing instruction: An analytical study

Main Article Content

Nafilah Aloairdhi
Ahmad Alhojailan

Abstract

The study explores the role of supervisors in English as a Foreign Language writing teaching in Saudi Arabia, bridging a significant gap in previous literature. Despite the tremendous hurdles that come with teaching writing successfully, supervisors act as educational leaders who guide and support teachers in adopting effective writing instruction techniques. The purpose of this study is to investigate the roles of supervisors in promoting successful EFL writing teaching, as well as the factors that influence their involvement in this context. The study used a qualitative technique, conducting semi-structured interviews with eleven professional educators at various educational levels. The data demonstrate a variety of supervisory techniques, highlighting differences in approaches between male and female supervisors, with female supervisors frequently having more stringent expectations for lesson design and strategy implementation. Additionally, cultural factors and external constraints have a substantial impact on supervisory positions, underlining the need of supervisors fostering a collaborative environment, prioritizing professional growth, and addressing cultural settings in their supervisory practices. The study finishes with recommendations and suggestions for further research.  The findings provide important insights into the dynamics of EFL writing instruction and the role of supervisors in improving teaching quality in Saudi Arabia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aloairdhi, N. ., & Alhojailan, A. (2024). Supervisory roles and influencing factors in enhancing EFL writing instruction: An analytical study. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/p9wm8870
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Aloairdhi, N. ., & Alhojailan, A. (2024). Supervisory roles and influencing factors in enhancing EFL writing instruction: An analytical study. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/p9wm8870

Share

References

Agheshteh, H., & Mehrpur, S. (2021). Teacher Autonomy and Supervisor Authority:

Power Dynamics in Language Teacher Supervision in Iran. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 87−106.

Ahmed, M., & Johnson, L. (2019). Supervisor-Led Workshops: Enhancing EFL

Teachers’ Writing Instruction Skills. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 56(2), 124-140.

Alhojailan, A. (2015). Perceptions of academic writing by some Saudi graduate

students studying in American universities (10140161) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Al-Khairi, M., & Zafar, S. (2022). Mitigating EFL Teacher Burnout: The Role of

Supervisory Support in Writing Instruction. Journal of Educational Supervision, 18(1), 44-60.

Al-Seghayer, K. (2011). English teaching in Saudi Arabia: Status, issues, and

challenges. Hala Print CO.

Atefinia, A. & Alavinia, P. (2019). Supervisory Feedback: The Weight of

Compliments, Criticisms and Suggestions Revisited. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies. 7(3). 59-66.

Bailey, K. M. (2009). Language teacher supervision. In A. Burns, & J. C. Richards

(Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 269–278). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative

Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019a). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.

Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019b, April). Thematic analysis | a reflexive approach. The

University of Auckland. https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html

Brown, H., & Smith, T. (2021). Supervisory Impact on Writing Assessment in EFL

Contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(4), 301-316.

Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and

learning. In The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 225-240). Cambridge University Press.

Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). Gender and leadership. In D. V. Day & J.

Antonakis (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 437-476). SAGE Publications.

Chen, C., & Cheng, Y. (2013). The Supervisory Process of EFL Teachers: A Case

Study. The electronic journal for English as a second language. TESL-EJ, 17(1), 1-21.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Inc.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative,

and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003).

Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.

Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233

Forbes, K. (2019). Teaching for transfer between first and foreign language classroom

contexts: Developing a framework for a strategy-based, cross-curricular approach to writing pedagogy. Writing and Pedagogy, 11(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.34601

Gebhard, J. G. (1984). Models of supervision: Choices. TESOL Quarterly, 18,501-

Ghulam, M., Yousuf, M., Parveen, Q., & Kayani, M. (2011). Concept of Supervision

and Supervisory Practices at Primary Level in Pakistan. International Education Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n4p28

Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. Doubleday.

Hinchey, P. H. (2010). Getting teacher assessment right: What policy-makers can

learn from research. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/getting_teacher_assessment_right

Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge

University Press.

Johnson, D., & Martinez, A. (2023). Supervisor-Facilitated Collaboration and its

Impact on Student Writing Performance in EFL Settings. Language Teaching and Learning Research, 47(3), 257-272.

Lee, J., & Park, S. (2020). The Role of Supervisors in EFL Curriculum Adaptation:

Focusing on Writing Instruction. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 32(1), 78-92.

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.

MAXQDA. (2020). Discover MAXQDA. MAXQDA: The art of data analysis.

https://www.maxqda.com/what-is-maxqda

Mehrpour, S., & Agheshteh, H. (2017). Supervisory feedback efficiency: Developing

a framework based on Iranian EFL teachers’ and supervisors’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(3), 24-33.

Mohammad, T., & Hazarika, Z. (2016). Difficulties of learning EFL in KSA: Writing

skills in context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 105-117.

Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to

meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1609406917733847

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language

teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.

Shukri, N., & Sheikhi, A. (2017). The Role of Supervisory Feedback in Enhancing

EFL Teachers’ Writing Instruction. Journal of Teacher Education and Supervision, 45(3), 189-203.

Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2018). The Role of Supervisory Support in Enhancing EFL

Teachers’ Morale and Instructional Quality. TESOL Journal, 10(2), 233-248.

Yu, S., Liu, C., & Zhang, L. (2023). Understanding L2 writers’ lived experiences of

informal writing: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100979