The role of cultural element “Dalihan Natolu” in Batak community as the resource of conflict resolution
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Batak community in North Sumatra, Indonesia, is characterized by its rich cultural heritage, with “Dalihan Natolu” serving as a fundamental principle governing social relations and conflict resolution. This paper explores the role of Dalihan Natolu in Batak society, particularly within the context of conflicts arising from modernization and development projects such as the Lake Toba tourism area. Despite its historical significance, Dalihan Natolu faces challenges in addressing contemporary conflicts, particularly regarding land disputes between the indigenous Sigapiton community and the Lake Toba Authority Implementing Agency (BPODT). This study also aims to analyze BPODT’s crisis communication strategies in handling conflicts with the Sigapiton community and examine the influence of Dalihan Natolu on these communication dynamics. By delving into these issues, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how cultural traditions intersect with modern challenges, demanding insights into conflict resolution and community cohesion within the Batak society.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Banks, S. P. (2000). Multicultural public relations. A social-interpretive approach (2nd ed.). Lowa State University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Aproaches, Fourth Edi (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Dezin, & Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.
Eisenberg, E. M., & Riley, P. (2000). Organizational culture. In Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods. Sage.
Firmando, H. B. (2021). Kearifan lokal sistem kekerabatan dalihan na tolu dalam merajut harmoni sosial di kawasan Danau Toba. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 5(1), 16–36.
Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hall, A. S. (1981). Notes on Mechanism Analysis. Balt Publishers.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Doubleday.
Harahap, A. S., Mulyono, H., A. Nuzul, A. N., Milhan, M., & Siregar, T. (2023). Dalihan Na Tolu as a Model for Resolving Religious Conflicts in North Sumatera: An Anthropological and Sociological Perspective. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(3), 1943–1969. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.13091
Harahap, R. B. (2019). Analisis kritis peran dalihan natolu dalam perkawinan masyarakat Batak Angkola Tapanuli Selatan. Jurnal Al-Maqasid, 5(1), 69–81.
Hasibuan, T. R. L. & Rahmat. (2020). The strategy of the Mandailing community in preserving the culture of the dalihan natolu as a form of national identity. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2019), 418, 471–474. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.089
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage.
Hong-Xoan, N. T., & Earl, C. (2020). Camaraderie and Conflict: Intercultural Communication and Workplace Interactions in South Korean Companies in Bình Dương Province, Vietnam. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(6), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620935423
Jamal, A., Nasir, M., Syathi, P. B., & Fitriyani. (2023). Developing village in the former conflict region of Indonesia through social and economic inclusion: Evidence from Aceh. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2178521. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2178521
Leksono, S. (2013). Penelitian Kualitatif Ilmu Ekonomi: Dari Metodologi ke Metode. Rajawali Pers PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Lubis, M. N., Joebagio, H., & Pelu, M. (2019). Dalihan na tolu sebagai kontrol sosial dalam kemajuan teknologi. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah Budaya dan Pengajarannya, 13(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v13i12019p025
Lumbantobing, T. I. M., Waruwu, L. Y., Hasibuan, S., Hasibuan, P., Sofyanti, D. F., Sari, H., & Ivanna, J. (2023). Cerminan Filosofi Batak Toba “Dalihan Natolu” terhadap Nilai-Nilai Luhur Bangsa Indonesia. Policy Review, 1(1), 25–32.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Edition) (3rd ed., Vol. 4). SAGE Publications Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (1997). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ndona, Y., Siagian, L., Ginting, P. P., & Barus, F. L. (2022). Dalihan na tolu: Vision of the integrity of the Batak toba community and inspiration for the development of national unity. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(9), 1018–1030.
Priyono, C. D. (2021). Dalihan na tolu dalam perspektif sosial. Jurnal ESTUPRO, 6(1), 82–92.
Priyono, C. D., & Siregar, I. (2021). Degradasi nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dalihan na tolu pada remaja di kota Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(4), 346–353.
Resdati. (2022). Eksistensi nilai dalihan na tolu pada generasi muda Batak Toba di perantauan. Sosial Budaya, 19(1), 58–63.
Sahrul. (2017). The role of dalihan na tolu in keep the interreligious harmony at Balige district, Toba Samosir regency. International Journal of Development Research, 7(8), 14232–14237.
Sriramesh, K., & Duhé, S. C. (2009). Extending cultural horizons: Political economy and public relations. Public Relations Review, 35, 368–375.
Stohl, C. (2000). Globalizing organizational communication. In Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods. Sage.
Sugiyono. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods, Quantitative and R&D. ALPHABETA.