Demonization of virtual reality in modern media culture
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the demonization of virtual reality in modern media culture, with a focus on understanding the reasons behind the negative portrayal of virtual reality technologies. The purpose of this article was to identify and analyze the prevalent narratives and discourses surrounding virtual reality in contemporary media culture, and to explore the underlying factors contributing to its demonization. In this research, a qualitative study design was employed, utilizing content analysis of media articles, contemporary literary works, and scientific viewpoints from futurologists and researchers who study virtual reality technology and mass media. To identify recurring themes and patterns in virtual reality presentations, a thematic analysis approach was used. The analysis revealed that virtual reality was often portrayed negatively in media culture, with its potential risks and drawbacks emphasized over its benefits and possibilities. The findings also highlighted recurring themes, such as concerns about the impact of virtual reality on mental health, disconnection from reality, and ethical dilemmas. The demonized portrayal of virtual reality in modern media culture is influential for virtual reality developers, policymakers, consumers, and media representatives, such as fiction, creative, and fantasy writers, journalists, critics, and other stakeholders. It is crucial to understand the reasons behind this negative portrayal to develop strategies for addressing concerns, promoting responsible use of virtual reality, and fostering a more balanced and nuanced understanding of its potential benefits and challenges.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Babbage, C. (1989). Science and reform: selected works of Charles Babbage (p. 356). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521343119, 9780521343114.
Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do (p. 304). WW Norton & Company. ISBN 0393253708, 9780393253702.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Body, in theory (p. 164). University of Michigan press.
Briggs, R. (2013). The future of prediction: speculating on William Gibson's meta-science-fiction. Textual Practice, 27(4), 671-693.
Cabrera, Ó. (2019). Diana Roig. Fotogramas & DVD: La primera revista de cine, 72(2112), 38-38.
Calvert, B. (2005). Cyborg Utopia in Marge Piercy's Body of Glass. Foundation-Dagenham, 95, 52.
Cavallaro, D. (2000). Cyberpunk & Cyberculture: Science fiction and the work of William Gibson. A&C Black.
Chougule, R., Cadigan, P., & Shiner, L. (2019). Technophobia or technophilia?: a study of cyberpunk science fiction. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University. Sub-Campus, Osmanaba, Maharashtra, India-413501.
Cornelius, N. G. (2020). M, le bord de l'abîme by Bernard Minier. The French Review, 94(1), 259-260.
Danilyan, O., Dzoban, O., & Kalynovskyi, Y. (2023). Digital man as a product of the information society. Cogito (2066-7094), 15(1).
de Regt, A., Plangger, K., & Barnes, S. J. (2021). Virtual reality marketing and customer advocacy: Transforming experiences from story-telling to story-doing. Journal of Business Research, 136, 513-522.
Deleuze, G. (2019). Cinema I: The movement-image. In Philosophers on Film from Bergson to Badiou: A Critical Reader (pp. 152-176). Columbia University Press.
Descartes, R. (1644). Prinoipia philosophiae. Amsterdam: Louis Elzevir. (As reprinted as Principles of Philosophy, (ed. and trans.) V.R. Miller and R.P. Miller. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983.)
Dimitroff, N. (2019). The Dealer of realities (p. 400). In Ilona Chavasse translation. Colibli. https://www.colibri.bg/eng/books/1824/nicholas-dimitroff-dealer-of-realities
Dupak, V. (2012). Virtual phenomena in the structure of social institutions. Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, 2(22), 241-248.
Farmer, H. (2023). Reducing dehumanisation through virtual reality: prospects and pitfalls. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 52, 101283.
Fuchs, T. (2022). Understanding Sophia? On human interaction with artificial agents. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1-22.
Gallardo, A., Choy, C., Juneja, J., Bozkir, E., Cobb, C., Bauer, L., & Cranor, L. (2023). Speculative Privacy Concerns About AR Glasses Data Collection. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 4, 416-435.
Giger, J. C., Piçarra, N., Alves‐Oliveira, P., Oliveira, R., & Arriaga, P. (2019). Humanization of robots: Is it really such a good idea? Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 111-123.
Greer, C. (2016). Crime, media and community: Grief and virtual engagement in late modernity. In Cultural criminology unleashed (pp. 123-132). Routledge-Cavendish.
Hafner, K., & Markoff, J. (1995). Cyberpunk: outlaws and hackers on the computer frontier, revised. A Touchstone book (p. 396). Simon and Schuster.
Han, D. I. D., Bergs, Y., & Moorhouse, N. (2022). Virtual reality consumer experience escapes: preparing for the metaverse. Virtual Reality, 26(4), 1443-1458.
Hein, D. W., Jodoin, J. L., Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ivens, B. S. (2017). Are wearables good or bad for society?: An exploration of societal benefits, risks, and consequences of augmented reality smart glasses. In Mobile technologies and augmented reality in open education (pp. 1-25). IGI Global.
Hermann, I. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors. AI & society, 38(1), 319-329.
Iatsyshyn, A. V., Kovach, V. O., Romanenko, Y. O., & Iatsyshyn, A. V. (2019). Cloud services application ways for preparation of future PhD. Paper presented at the CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2433 197-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3248.
Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I., Miller, G., Li, S., & Weick, M. (2021). Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 16(8), e0256822.
Jansen, B. J., Jung, S. G., & Salminen, J. (2023). Employing large language models in survey research. Natural Language Processing Journal, 4, 100020.
Jones, S. (2017). Disrupting the narrative: Immersive journalism in virtual reality. Journal of media practice, 18(2-3), 171-185.
Juma, C. (2016). Innovation and its enemies: Why people resist new technologies. Oxford University Press.
Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103-156.
Kuss, D. J., Kardefelt-Winther, D., & Billieux, J. (2020). Historical Context and Upcoming Developments in Digital Technologies. The Oxford Handbook of Digital Technologies and Mental Health, 3.
Lu, A. (1993). Jack In The Text: From Multimetdia to Hypertext, The Written Word Finds A New Home. ETC: A review of general semantics, 50(4), 496-500.
Massey, J., & Tatla, R. S. (2016). Moral panic and media representation: The Bradford riot. In Global Islamophobia (pp. 175-194). Routledge.
McCombs, M., & Valenzuela, S. (2020). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons.
McFarlane, A., Murphy, G. J., & Schmeink, L. (2020). Cyberpunk as Cultural Formation (pp. 1-3). London and New York: Routledge.
Meskó, B., & Topol, E. J. (2023). The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1), 120.
Michalik, D., Kohl, P., & Kummert, A. (2022). Smart cities and innovations: Addressing user acceptance with virtual reality and Digital Twin City. IET Smart Cities, 4(4), 292-307.
Minier, B. (2019). "M, Edge of the Abyss". ISBN: 9782374481210. https://bernard-minier.com/en/roman/m-the-edge-of-the-abyss/
Nelson, K. M., Anggraini, E., & Schlüter, A. (2020). Virtual reality as a tool for environmental conservation and fundraising. Plos one, 15(4), e0223631.
Nielson, E. I. (2022). Dislike: Facebook's Anticompetitive Monopoly on Social Media and Why US Antitrust Laws Must Adapt to the Technological Era. SMU L. Rev. F., 75, 120.
Papatsimouli, M., Sarigiannidis, P., & Fragulis, G. F. (2023). A Survey of Advancements in Real-Time Sign Language Translators: Integration with IoT Technology. Technologies, 11(4), 83.
Rees, F. (2006). Johannes Gutenberg: Inventor of the printing press. Capstone.
Rice, A. (1998). Ada Lovelace: New Light on her Mathematics. Bienvenue au numéro de septembre 2020des Notes de la SMC, 1998.
Sebastian, G. (2023). Exploring Ethical Implications of ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots and Regulation of Disinformation Propagation. SSRN, 4461801.
Shin, M., Lee, S., Song, S. W., & Chung, D. (2021). Enhancement of perceived body ownership in virtual reality-based teleoperation may backfire in the execution of high-risk tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106605.
Sinatra, G. M. (2022). Motivational and emotional impacts on public (mis) understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 1-10.
Slater, M., Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Haggard, P., Vinkers, C., Gregory-Clarke, R., Jelley, S., et al. (2020). The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1, 1.
Spiegel, J. S. (2018). The ethics of virtual reality technology: Social hazards and public policy recommendations. Science and engineering ethics, 24(5), 1537-1550.
Tufekci, Z. (2014). Social movements and governments in the digital age: Evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 1-18.
Turner, C. (2022). Augmented reality, augmented epistemology, and the real-world web. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1), 19.
Ward, S. J. (2018). Disrupting journalism ethics: Radical change on the frontier of digital media. Routledge.
Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, (Vol. 25). MIT Press, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13140-000
Yağanoğlu, M. (2021). Real time wearable speech recognition system for deaf persons. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 91, 107026.
Zhang, L., Bowman, D. A., & Jones, C. N. (2019, September). Exploring effects of interactivity on learning with interactive storytelling in immersive virtual reality. In 2019 11th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Zheng, W. (2023). The Cyborg Figure in Relation to Femininity, Humanity and Technology: A Literature Perspective. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(3), 49-54. DOI: 10.25236/AJHSS.2023.060309
Zinovieva, I. S., Artemchuk, V. O., Iatsyshyn, A. V., Popov, O. O., Kovach, V. O., Iatsyshyn, A. V., et al. (2021). The use of online coding platforms as additional distance tools in programming education. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012029