Religious adaptive reuse and spatial organisation: Comparing the Fisandon Church-Mosque and Nuh Paşa Mosque in Karaman, Türkiye
Main Article Content
Abstract
Religious adaptive reuse brings inherited architectural arrangements into relation with new requirements for worship. This study compares the Fisandon Church-Mosque and the Nuh Paşa Mosque in Karaman, Türkiye, to examine those relationships through documented spatial organisation. The former is a Byzantine cross-in-square church converted into a mosque; the latter was founded as a mosque in 1596. A qualitative documentary comparison applies seven shared criteria to author-prepared schematic plans and the sources cited for each building. Three contrasts emerge. Four internal piers articulate the converted church’s central space, whereas the Nuh Paşa schematic shows no corresponding arrangement. At Fisandon, the western entrance follows the inherited narthex–naos–apse sequence, while the northern entrance faces the mihrab wall; prayer orientation consequently differs from the inherited church axis. At Nuh Paşa, the last-congregation area, hall and mihrab wall follow one sequence. Finally, the enclosed narthex and the externally attached last-congregation area have different boundaries and historical identities. The comparison makes the coexistence of inherited organisation and religious adaptation explicit without assessing functional performance. Because the buildings differ in period, tradition and original design, their contrasts cannot be attributed solely to conversion. The findings offer a contribution to understanding the conservation of these religious heritage buildings.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Açıcı, F. K., & Konakoğlu, Z. N. (2019). Tarihi yapıların yeniden işlevlendirilmesi: Trabzon Mimarlar Odası örneği [Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: The case of the Trabzon Chamber of Architects]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(2), 214–224. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/article/587899
Ahunbay, Z. (2017). Tarihi çevre koruma ve restorasyon [Conservation and restoration of the historic environment]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Yem Yayınları.
Akyürek Algın, M., & Baykara, B. (2026). Erken dönem Osmanlı camilerinde mekânsal organizasyon: Başkent örneklerinde mekân dizimi analizi [Spatial organisation in early Ottoman mosques: Space syntax analysis of examples from the capital]. Hars Akademi, 9, 13–28. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/5904635
Arslanoğlu, İ. A., & Erdoğan, Y. (1987). Karaman Nuhpaşa Camii. Rölöve ve Restorasyon Dergisi, 6, 59–68. Retrieved from https://isamveri.org/pdfdrg/D00106/1987_6/1987_6_ARSLANOGLUIA_ERDOGANY.pdf
Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439
Denktaş, M. (1995). Karaman’daki klasik devir Osmanlı camileri. Vakıflar Dergisi, 25, 125–146. Retrieved from https://vakiflardergisi.org/index.php/pub/article/view/205
Emad, F., Movahed, K., Taghipour, M., & Heidari, A. A. (2021). Recognition of the principles of spatial hierarchy in traditional mosques of Iran and its analysis by space syntax method (Case study: Mosques of Shiraz). Islamic Art Studies, 17, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.22034/ias.2020.259734.1446
Eyice, S. (1971). Karadağ (Binbirkilise) ve Karaman çevresinde arkeolojik incelemeler [Archaeological investigations in Karadağ (Binbirkilise) and around Karaman] (Publication No. 1587). İstanbul, Türkiye: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi.
Fadakari, M. M., & Andaroodi, E. (2024). Patterns in the spatial configuration of Sultani mosques in the Qajar period: A comparative study using space syntax and layout-based analysis. Built Heritage, 8, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00141-4
Franco, G. (2024). Adaptive reuse of religious and sacred heritage: Preserving material traces and spirit of place. Heritage, 7, 4725–4754. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090224
Gümüştop, A., & Bıyıklı, M. (2019). Vakfiyesi ışığında Karaman Nuh Paşa Camii [The Karaman Nuh Paşa Mosque in the light of its waqfiyya]. In H. Muşmal, E. Yüksel, & M. A. Kapar (Eds.), Karaman araştırmaları—I (pp. 121–130). Konya, Türkiye: Palet Yayınları.
Karpuz, H. (2009). Türk kültür varlıkları envanteri: Karaman [Inventory of Turkish cultural assets: Karaman]. Ankara, Türkiye: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
Küçük, S. G., & Eyüpgiller, K. K. (2018). Çatalca Vilayeti’nde camiye çevrilen kiliselerin dönüşüm süreci ve mimari analizi [The conversion process and architectural analysis of churches converted into mosques in Çatalca]. Megaron, 13(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.07088
Meraki, Ş. (2006). Karaman-Merkez Dereköy Fisandon Kilise Camii rölöve ve restorasyon projesi raporu [Survey and restoration project report for the Fisandon Church-Mosque, Dereköy, Karaman]. Konya, Türkiye: Konya Vakıflar Bölge Müdürlüğü Arşivi.
Mostafa, F. A., & Hassan, A. S. (2013). Mosque layout design: An analytical study of mosque layouts in the early Ottoman period. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2013.08.005
Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2011). Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: A literature review. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 118. Retrieved from https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-the-built-environment/118/22728
Redjem, M., & Mazouz, S. (2022). Spatial and social interaction in medieval Algerian mosques: A morphological analysis using space syntax. Built Heritage, 6, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-022-00064-y
Solak, C., & Okuyucu, Ş. E. (2022). Dini yapıların dönüştürülmesinde mevcut yapı bileşenlerinin yeni işlevdeki karşılıkları: Kilise ve cami dönüşümleri [Correspondence of existing building components in the new function during the conversion of religious buildings: Church and mosque conversions]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 49, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1153376
Tapur, T. (2017). Karaman çevresindeki tarihi yerleşim alanları [Historical settlement areas around Karaman]. Türk İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(24), 101–114. Retrieved from https://rrpubs.com/index.php/timad/article/view/1866
Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. (2001). Karaman. In TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Vol. 24, pp. 444–447). İstanbul, Türkiye: Author. Retrieved from https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/karaman
Uğursal, S. (2011). Tarihi yapıların yeniden işlevlendirilmesi: İzmir Sümerbank Basma Sanayi Yerleşkesi örneği [Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: The case of the İzmir Sümerbank Printing Factory Campus] (Master’s thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Vafaie, F., Remøy, H., & Gruis, V. (2023). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings; a systematic literature review of success factors. Habitat International, 142, 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102926