Deciphering the Linguistic Features of Legal Discourse in Saudi Legal Texts: A Focus on Lexicalization, Modality, and Nominalization
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study draws on legal discourse analysis to investigate the linguistic characteristics of the legal discourse in selected Saudi legal texts. The analytical focus is on three linguistic features: lexicalization, modality, and nominalization. The main objective is to decipher the role of the three linguistic features in constructing legal meanings, establishing legal authority and legitimizing legal institutions. In doing so, a qualitative legal discourse analysis of a number of Saudi legal texts is performed to identify the patterns characteristic of those texts and explore their role in legal communication. There are three findings in this study: first, Saudi legal texts abound in lexical choices used dexterously to maintain precision, coherence, and legal certainty; second, modality is used in the selected texts to communicate obligations, permissions, prohibitions, and rights; and third, nominalization is frequently used for enhancing the text formality, objectivity, and impersonality, thereby highlighting legal acts maintained in Saudi legal texts. The study highlights the role of language in shaping the meaning-making process in Saudi legal discourse.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Abdukhalilov, S., Almasoud, S., Elaraby, M., & Hundt, B. (2020). Introduction to the legal system of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A&O Shearman Legal Briefing. Available at: file:///C:/Users/POWER%20PC/Downloads/3a4f7de2-40dc-4757-9ebd-849f962c3b50.pdf
Alcaraz, E., & Hughes, B. (2002). Legal translation explained. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760346
Alharbi, R. (2023). Toward the development of the regulatory framework of legislative drafting and law-making process in Saudi Arabia. Statute Law Review, 44(3), Article hmad008. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad008
Alharbi, B. F., & BinMasad, S. (2023). A critical analysis of Saudi legal terms and their English translations. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 7(2), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no2.9
Alhoqbani, A. (2024). The role of deictic expressions in controlling meaning in legal texts. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 6(3), 298-319. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v6i3.2074
Alshammari, B. S., Alfraidi, K. N., Khalil, H. E., Karam, K. M., & Eissa, M. (2025). Semiotics of physical evidence in criminal rulings in Saudi judicial texts: A multimodal discourse analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10383-9
Alzahrani, R. (2023). The general term in Islamic fundamentals of jurisprudence: An applied study on selected Saudi legal texts. Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Research, 35(41), 975-1018. https://doi.org/10.21608/jlr.2023.191069.1162
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.
Bhatia, V. K., & Bhatia, A. (2011). Legal discourse across cultures and socio-pragmatic contexts. World Englishes, 30(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01727.x
Cann, R. (1993). Formal semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166317
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Elfarahaty, H. (2016). Translating lexical legal terms between English and Arabic. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 29(2), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9460-2
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819679
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell Publishing.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2021). Corpus linguistics in legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(5), 1515-1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09860-8
Halimi, S.A. (2024). Bilingual legal resources for Arabic: State of affairs and future perspectives. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37, 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10059-2
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Hasan, A. S., & Alrashed, A. (2024). Discourse in legal contexts: Its concept, patterns and functions. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 6(2), 250-280. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v6i2.1945
Kurzon, D. (1986). It is hereby performed…: Explorations in legal speech acts. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.6
Leung, J. H. C., & Durant, A. (Eds.). (2020). Meaning and power in the language of law. Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178
Rodríguez-Puente, P. (2024). Is legal discourse really “outside the ravages of time”? A diachronic analysis of nominalizations in British judicial decisions. In: L. Caon, M. S. Gordon, & T. Porck (Eds.), Unlocking the history of English: Pragmatics, prescriptivism and text types (pp. 101-128). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.364.05rod
Shemy, A. (2024). Grammatische Merkmale der deutschen und arabischen Rechtssprache – eine kontrastive Studie am Beispiel der verwaltungsgerichtlichen Urteile in Deutschland und Ägypten [Grammatical characteristics of German and Arabic legal language: A contrastive study of administrative court judgments in Germany and Egypt]. Comparative Legilinguistics, 58, 151-187. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2024.58.4
Shuman, A., & Bohmer, C. (2020). Discourse and narrative in legal settings: The political asylum process. In: A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 547-570). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.026
Sinsheimer, A. (2007). Christopher Williams, Tradition and change in legal English: Verbal constructions in prescriptive texts. Language in Society, 36(3), 473-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070339
Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.001.0001
Tessuto, G., Bhatia, V. K., Breeze, R., Brownlees, N., & Solly, M. (Eds.). (2020). The context and media of legal discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001
Trosborg, A. (1997). Rhetorical strategies in legal language: Discourse analysis of statutes and contracts. Gunter Narr Verlag.
Vogel, F. E. (2000). Islamic law and legal system: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400165