Conceptual metaphors of morality in Indonesian language: A corpus-based cognitive semantic study

Main Article Content

Nurainun Hasibuan
Mulyadi
Mahriyuni
Khairina Nasution
Nurlela
Rusdi Noor Rosa

Abstract

This study examines conceptual metaphors of morality in the Indonesian language using a corpus-based cognitive linguistic approach. Morality, as an abstract value system, is often understood through metaphors rooted in physical and cultural experiences. This study aims to identify and analyze conceptual metaphors of morality. The data consists of 650 sentence samples obtained from the Leipzig Corpora Collection (2020–2024) and analyzed using Sketch Engine through the Metaphoric Pattern Analysis method and Conceptual Metaphor Theory. The results identified 453 metaphorical expressions (69.69%) classified into 25 conceptual metaphors. The findings show that the dominant metaphor is MORALITY IS A BUILDING (26.49%), followed by MORALITY IS SPACE (11.70%) and MORALITY IS CLOTHING (9.71%). This pattern reflects the tendency of Indonesian society to understand morality as a solid yet fragile entity (a building), as a social environment or identity (space and clothing), and as something that can be measured vertically and is potentially vulnerable to damage. This study contributes to metaphor studies in cognitive linguistics by providing empirical data from Indonesia and offering insights into the construction of moral values in contemporary public discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasibuan, N., Mulyadi, Mahriyuni, Nasution, K., Nurlela, & Rosa, R. N. (2026). Conceptual metaphors of morality in Indonesian language: A corpus-based cognitive semantic study. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/325e9b95
Section
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

How to Cite

Hasibuan, N., Mulyadi, Mahriyuni, Nasution, K., Nurlela, & Rosa, R. N. (2026). Conceptual metaphors of morality in Indonesian language: A corpus-based cognitive semantic study. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/325e9b95

Share

References

Arcimavičienė, L. (2008). Morality through Metaphor: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Political Discourse. Kalbotyra, 59, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2008.7588

Biemann, T., Zacher, H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Career patterns: A twenty-year panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.003

Budd, K., Kelsey, D., Mueller, F., & Whittle, A. (2019). Metaphor, morality and legitimacy: A critical discourse analysis of the media framing of the payday loan industry. Organization, 26(6), 802–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418812569

Chatterjee, A. (2021). Pandemic as a Metaphor for Moral Degeneration in Tagore’s Rajarshi. New Literaria, 2(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2021.v02i2.006

Cristy, S. N., Mulyadi, M., & Syarfina, T. (2024). Metafora cinta dalam bahasa Batak Toba. Jurnal Genre (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 6(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v6i2.10839

Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W. (2021). Metaphor and Thought: Reflections on Metaphor in Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.

Gries, S. Th. (2009). What is Corpus Linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00149.x

Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Second Edition: Semanticss a Coursebook. Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, C. E. (2014). Why “Good” Followers Go “Bad”: The Power of Moral Disengagement. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(4), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.12806/V13/I4/C6

Kearns, K. (2011). Semantics. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2019). The Concept of Emotion in the Language of Metaphor. Routledge.

Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013

Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (2006). Think Points: Communicating Our American Values and Vision: A Progressive Handbook. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Cultural Models in Language and Thought (1st ed., pp. 195–221). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.009

Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic Creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English (Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.17

Leech, G. (1981). Semantics. Penguin Books Ltd.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Liu, Y., Li, K., Li, L., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., DiFabrizio, B., & Wang, H. (2020). Morphological Metaphor Mapping of Moral Concepts in Chinese Culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 554061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554061

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Mulyadi, Dardanila, & Yusuf, M. (2024). Emotive interjection in Asahan Malay language: A natural semantic metalanguage perspective. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(5), 2025172. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025172

Mulyadi, M., Yusuf, M., & Siregar, R. K. (2021). Verbal humor in selected Indonesian stand up comedian’s discourse: Semantic analysis using GVTH. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1943927. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1943927

Pirmansyah, P., & Nur, T. (2021). Metafora Konseptual dalam Al-Quran Surat Yasin: Kajian Semantik Kognitif. Jurnal Perspektif, 5(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v5i2.126

Rajeg, I. M. (2019). Metafora Emosi Bahasa Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/8dwms

Salman, M. B., & Al- Azzawi, S. K. (2021). Conceptual Metaphors of “Morality is Straightness” and “Immorality is Crookedness” in The Prophetic Hadith and Bible. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 28(3, 4), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.28.3.4.2021.23

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.

Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292744446_Corpus-based_approaches_to_metaphor_and_metonymy

Surip, M. (2021). Metafora Politik Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Pada Media Massa Nasional. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Voskoboinyk, V., & Sukhachova, N. (2023). Metaphor as a means of influencing the adressee (based on English advertising texts). Linguistics, (1 (47)), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2631-2023-1-47-96-107

Wang, H. L., Lu, Y. Q., & Lu, Z. Y. (2016). Moral-up first, immoral-down last: The time course of moral metaphors on a vertical dimension. NeuroReport, 27(4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000528

Yu, N. (2012). The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1335–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.002

Yu, N. (2016). Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763

Yu, N. (2022). The Moral Metaphor System: A Conceptual Metaphor Approach (1st ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192866325.001.0001

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.