Visual paradox as a means of visual semantic foregrounding
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the role of visual paradox as a stylistic device for achieving semantic foregrounding in advertising imagery, addressing an overlooked gap in research on visual semiotics. It focuses on how paradox shapes meaning and enhances communicative impact within multimodal contexts. The study investigates two selected advertisements—Seiko Lassale and Nestlé Munch Bunch—and adopts a triangulated qualitative approach that integrates semiotic-stylistic analysis, audience reception through a questionnaire involving 30 university students, and expert interviews with specialists in visual communication and cognitive semiotics. The findings demonstrate that paradox, created through techniques such as spatial disruption, role reversal, and unexpected visual juxtapositions, provokes psychological defamiliarization, captures the viewer’s attention, and stimulates deeper interpretive engagement. Key visual strategies, including compositional structure, contrasts in lighting, nuanced color blending, and the application of linear perspective via the Ponzo illusion, are shown to be essential in generating paradoxical effects. The study argues that paradox should not be viewed merely as an aesthetic ornament but as an intentional cognitive and persuasive strategy that reinforces the communicative strength of advertising images. It further highlights their stylistic and psychological dimensions, showing how paradox simultaneously activates cognitive processing and emotional response, thereby enhancing both the memorability and persuasive power of advertising discourse. Ultimately, the study offers a fresh contribution to multimodal stylistics and visual semiotics by positioning paradox as a central tool for semantic foregrounding in contemporary advertising.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Abouelnour, M. et al. (2024). Interactive communicative discourse in the Holy Qur’an: A deliberative approach. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(5), 1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1915
Abouelnour, M. et al. (2025). Grammatical performance and its implications in Farouk Shousha’s program Our Beautiful Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 670–681. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.7791
Adel, M A (2019) The Semiotics of Paratexts in Haifa Betar’s Novel “Bleeding Dreams” A Study in Modern Literary Criticism. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) 33(6): 963–972. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-033-006-003
Adel, M. A., et al. (2024). The representation of women with disabilities in Shahira Al-Hasan’s Cochlea’s Secrets. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 26(6), 8. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol26/iss6/8
Adel, M. A., et al. (2025a). Melville in motion: Cultural transformations of Moby-Dick in Arabic-dubbed cartoons. World Journal of English Language, 15(4), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p292
Adel, M. A., et al. (2025b). Unsettling the Norm: A Posthumanist Reading of Sameness and Differences in Kathryn Erskine’s Mockingbird. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1511.03
Alenezi, M., et al. (2026a). Beyond the feminine stereotypes: Tracing societal class barriers in Jojo Moyes’ Me Before You. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 15(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v15i1.5819
Alenzi, M. et al. (2026b). Performing the Self: A Bakhtinian Carnivalistic Reading of Amita Parikh’s The Circus Train. Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1701.13
Alhourani et al. (2025a). Decolonizing the Stage: Exploring Postcolonial Narratives and Identity in Rohina Malik‘s Unveiled. World Journal of English Language. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n1p95
Alhourani, M. I., et al. (2025b). Beyond the Mother Knot: Trauma and Intersectionality in Suzan-Lori Parks’ In the Blood. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1508.05
Alim M, et al. Mahsan I P, Harun M F, Zulkefli M Y (2024) The Visual Rhetoric in Comics for Reader Interpretation and Engagement to Meaning-Making in the Medium. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 40(3):434-447. https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/78437
Al-Rai, A., et al. (2026). The legal regulation of cybercrimes related to character assassination under the Jordanian and French legislation. F1000Research 15: 359. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1
Asif, M., et al. (2025). Honor killing and the cycle of social influence: A study of the Pakistani bride through Albert Bandura’s social learning theory. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities. https://doi.org/10.58256/pgj52m46
Barrow J D (1997) Denotation and connotation. In: Cobley P (ed.) The communication theory reader, Routledge, UK, p 129–133
Barrow J D (1998) Impossibility: The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits. Oxford University Press, Australia & New Zeland.
Barthes R., Heath S (1977) Image-Music-Text. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA10872380
Blackburn AL (2024) Dragging Music: Towards a Queer Socio-Cultural Semiotics. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 149 (1): 1-21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-musical-association/article/dragging-music-towards-a-queer-sociocultural-semiotics/C0905CBC6A3C20E4975718D1A2C2266E
Cavazzana A, (2021) The paradox of pictorial representation. A Wittgensteinian Solution. Studi di Estetica 21(3): 137-155
Cook G (1992) The discourse of advertising. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA53152791
Cuddon J A (1992) The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Penguin, UK
El-Erian, M., et al. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing corporate governance and achieving sustainable development. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 9(1): 208–232. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-9.1-a000177
Elhalafaway, A. et al. (2025). From Text to Performance: A Lehmannian Study of Postdramatic Strategies in Churchill’s Escape Alone and Stephens’ Light Falls. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. V6. pp. 1824-1832. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1606.04
Githapradana D M W (2024) The Application of Paradox Aesthetic Concepts and Values in the Design of Contemporary Urbanomad Androgynous Sarongs Through a Visual Metaphor Approach. In: Cano-Guervos, R, et al. (ed) Sustainability in Creative Industries. SCI 2022. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50894-3_21
Gregoriou C (2023) The linguistic levels of foregrounding in stylistics. In: Burke M (ed) The Routledge handbook of stylistics, 2nd ed. Routledge, London, p 89–102. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367568887-8
Güner S (2020) Wendt Versus Pollock: Toward Visual Semiotics in the Discipline of IR Theory. Semiotica 238: 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0036
Güner S (2025) Visual Semiotic Games and IR Theories. Paper presented at the 8th World Conference on Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Educations, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.62422/978-81-981590-2-1-008
Ikromovna K S (2025) A Contrastive Study of Foregrounding in English And Uzbek Languages. American Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanity Research 5(7): 99-101 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr/article/view/6240/5809
Jamil M J, Asif S I (2023) The visual rhetoric of images: an exploration of visual rhetorical figures in digital advertising. PalArch’s Journal of Archeology of Egypt 20(1): 119-141
Khadka T B (2025) Integrating Verbal and Visual Signs in Meaning Making: A Semiotic Analysis. Spectrum of Humanities and Social Sciences 1(1): 147-158
Kress G, van Leeuwen T (1996) Reading images: the grammar of visual design. Routledge, London
Lacey N (1998) Image and representation: key concepts in media studies. Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26712-5
Leech NG (1984) A linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman, London
Lewis M, Smith W (2022) Reflections on the 2021 AMR decade award: Navigating paradox is paradoxical. Academy of Management Review 47(4): 528-548. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0251
Li J (2024) The Pictorial Turn and Visual Rhetoric: Analyzing Image Agency and Persuasion in Contemporary Media. Advances in Humanities Research 9(1): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/9/2024105
Liang Y, Meng F (2025) An Analysis of the Promotional Video Beyond Words: Chinese Calligraphy from the Perspective of Visual Grammar. Highlights in Art and Design 11(2):24-30. https://doi.org/10.54097/7bvtex25
Maiorani A, Bateman JA, Liu C (2022) Towards semiotically driven empirical studies of ballet as a communicative form. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01399-8
Matsha N M, Thatelo M T (2025) Exploring Populist Visual Rhetoric of the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union: A Visual Social Semiotics Analysis Study. African Renaissance 22(2): 71-91. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.31920/2516-5305/2025/22n2a4
Mengoni A (2021) Visual semiotics. In: Manghani S (ed) The Palgrave handbook of image studies. Springer, Cham, p 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71830-5_39
Messaris P (1997) Visual persuasion: the role of images in advertising. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Miall DS, Kuiken D (1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 22(5):389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
Mick DG (1986) Consumer research and semiotics: exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. J Consum Res 13(2):196. https://doi.org/10.1086/209060
Nggilu, N. M., et al. (2026). Constructing humanitarian-based law: A philosophical analysis of the philanthropic legal paradigm. Yustisia, 14(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v14i3.98924
Pan W (2025) Visual Grammar and Cultural Meaning in Festive China: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies 7(4): 67-89. https://www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/eltls/article/view/56339
Pradies C, et al. Berti M, Pina e, Cunha M, Rego A, Tunarosa A, Clegg S (2023) A figure is worth a thousand words: The role of visualization in paradox theorizing. Organization Studies 44(8):1231-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231161998
Praszkier R (2025) The Meaning of Paradoxes and Paradoxical Thinking. Cambridge Series on Possibility Studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009448321
Qiqieh, S., et al. (2025). The impact of WhatsApp on first-year students’ transition to university life. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1552278. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1552278
Qutieshat, E., et al. (2026). Governing legal chatbots: Ethics, professional responsibility and liability in comparative perspective. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/ppfy4k96
Riaz N, et al. Qureshi QA, Tahir S, Waheed I (2024) Signs and symbols: a semiotic exploration of visual media and its underlying ideologies. Journal of Arts Linguist Study 2(2):705–725. https://jals.miard.org/index.php/jals/article/view/117
Rocatelli VB, Rossi C (2021) Time oddity: paradoxes and the gothic. Literartes 1(15):243–260. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9826.literartes.2021.185898
Semetsky I (2023) Visual semiotics, abduction, and the learning paradox: the role of graphic signs. In: Magnani L (ed) Handbook of abductive cognition. Springer, Cham, p 669–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_40
Short M (1996) Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Longman, London
Stoicheva D (2025) Image recognition in the traffic sign system – semiotic and linguistic aspects. Paper presented at the Environment technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2: 337-344. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol2.8574
Sugihara K (2011) Spatial realization of Escher’s impossible world. Asia Pac Math Newsl 1(1):1–5. http://www.asiapacific-mathnews.com/01/0101/0001_0005.pdf
Tanaka K (1994) Advertising language. Routledge, London
Tartakovsky R, Shen Y (2019) Flat as a wall or flat as a butcher’s hand The poetic simile and second-order semantic foregrounding. Scientific Study of Literature 8 (2): 293-312. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.18010.tar
Tevdoradze N (2023) The concept of Foregrounding in the wake of the developments of stylistics. Online Journal of Humanities ETAGTSU (8):10. https://doi.org/10.52340/PUTK.2023.2346-8149.07
Van Peer W (1986) Stylistics and psychology: investigations of foregrounding. Croom Helm, London.
Yusuff A (2021) A multimodal discourse analysis of visual images of persuasion and references in television commercials of selected banks in Nigeria. Ibadan Journal of English studies (special edition): 95-131