Viewing through the queer lens: Reception of homosexuality in South Indian Cinema
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indian cinema, transregional by nature, has not only produced commercially successful films in Hindi language but also has succeeded in producing box office hit films from the regions like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, which constitute the popularly known south Indian film industry. The success of these films is influenced by various factors, to list a few, widespread audience, technical and technological advancements, rational, close to life and sensitive narratives, the advent of OTT platforms etc. Films dealing with queer themes in south Indian film industry have gained prominence worth discussion and debate post 1990 with gender sensitisation and awareness programmes leading to a ripple formation in the dichotomous male/female gender hierarchal system of the Indian society. This study, adopting a quantitative approach, focuses on films dealing with homosexuality produced by the south Indian film industry. It investigates the effect of destigmatisation of homosexuality through films and delves deep to understand the common perception on films featuring queer themes as well as audience interpretation of these queer visual texts. The study concludes on how the queer representations in south Indian cinema are yet not fully engaged with the audience contributing to an increased awareness about the sexual minority communities to build and promote an inclusive society.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Aminudin, A. (2018). Audience in reception analysis perspective [Online]. The Asian Conference on Media, Communication & Film 2018 Official Conference Proceedings. The International Academic Forum. Retrieved from https://papers.iafor.org/submission42733/
Bartling, H. (2003). Intentions and mass culture. In D. A. Gerstner & J. Staiger (Eds.), Authorship and Film (1st ed., pp. 119–136). New York: Routledge.
Bhargava, Y. (2020, December 10). India has highest viewership of films on Netflix globally. The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com
Cavalcante, A. (2018). Struggling for ordinary: Media and transgender belonging in Everyday Life. New York: New York University Press.
Dixit, M. (2022). Quantitative analysis of Indian audiences liking and disliking for TV reality shows. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 40(5), 489–513. https://doi:10.1080/10509208.2022.2049180
Dutta, A. (2022). Content Carnival? (Re)Viewing Representation, Indianness, and OTT Culture in India. In Streaming and Screen Culture in Asia-Pacific (pp. 145–160). essay, Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09374-6.
Habidin, N.B, Adzmi, A.M, Salleh, M. A.M, & Al, M. N.S (2023). Media Screen Addiction and the Evolution of Juveniles’ Behaviour towards LGBT Pornographic Materials. SEARCH Journal Media and Communication Research, 15(3), 51–65.
Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (2015). Culture, media, language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. London: Routledge.
Hilton-Morrow, W., & Battles, K. (2015). Sexual identities and the media: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
James, R., & Venkatesan, S. (2022). Mapping the queer body: Queer tropes and Malayalam Cinema. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 21, 85–92. https://10.21315/ws2022.21.7
Jowett, G., & Linton, J. M. (1980). Movies as mass communication (First). Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
Karim, M. R., Sharma, R., & Banu, S. (2023). Of a Free Man: Downplaying colonial crisis in the discourse of V. S. Naipaul. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i2.1192
McQuail, P. D. (1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mehta, A., Saraswat, S., & Paul, M. F. (2022). A critique of baby making supermarts: Surrogacy clinics in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love (2012). Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 3(4), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i1.958
Mokkil, N. (2019). Xavier Dolan in India: The alchemy of film viewing. In A. Lafontaine (Ed.), ReFocus: The Films of Xavier Dolan. (pp. 156–173). Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Nandwani, S. R. (2024). Tollywood vs. Bollywood-A Study on Audiences’ Perceptions. GAP iNTERDISCIPLINARITIES - a Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(4), 64–77.
Natarajan, T. (2020). Voicing the Voiceless: Representation of the Excluded Transgender Community in Tamil Cinema. In Handbook of Research on Social and Cultural Dynamics in Indian Cinema (pp. 197–210). essay, Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global.
Qasim Khan, H. M., Shakil, M. H., Mahmud Zuhudi, N. W., Haider, S. Z., & Nadeem, R. (2024). Freedom of expression in films: A qualitative study exploring challenges and Opportunities in Pakistan. SEARCH Journal Media and Communication Research, 16(2), 18–33. doi:10.58946/search-16.2. p2
Sanyal, S. (Ed.). (2023). Introduction. In Gender, Sexuality, and Indian Cinema: Queer Visuals (First, pp. 1–5). introduction, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Singh, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Consuming the non-human and the less-than-human: A critical study of Sarah Kane’s Blasted (1995). Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/t4ga5n47
Srinivas, L. (1998). Active viewing: An ethnography of the Indian film audience. Visual Anthropology, 11(4), 323–353. doi:10.1080/08949468.1998.9966759
Srinivas, S. V. (2015). Region in focus. Bioscope, 6(2), vii–ix. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974927615600618
Srinivas, S. V. (2022, June 14). Rise of the Regional Blockbuster. The India Forum: A Journal-Magazine on Contemporary Issues. Retrieved from https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/rise-regional-blockbuster
Thangavelu, A. P. (2020). Film as a Reflection of Society: Reception of Social Drama in Tamil Cinema. In Handbook of Research on Social and Cultural Dynamics in Indian Cinema (pp. 185–196). essay, Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global.
Currah, P. (2016, April 26). Feminism, Gender Pluralism, and Gender Neutrality: Maybe it’s time to bring back the binary [web log]. Retrieved from https://www.paisleycurrah.com/2016/04/26/feminism-gender-pluralism-and-gender-neutral