Political Artifacts from the Jakarta International Stadium as Local Leadership Impression Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Jakarta International Stadium building artifacts are used as political buildings by several political actors involved in development planning to gain public support. The study aims to demonstrate how the Jakarta International Stadium's political artifacts shape Anies Baswedan's impression management. This study employs a qualitative approach based on Discourse Network Analysis. Four Twitter posts on the development of the Jakarta International Stadium were used as the data source. The study shows that managing formed impressions creates negative and positive sentiments by bringing up nine dominant discourses. Religious Discourse, Leadership, Presidential Candidates, and Development Performance all left a favorable impression. At the same time, issues such as health, image, happiness index, leadership, presidential candidates, sports, and others cast a negative light. First, three social effects will boost Anies popularity by introducing modern technology to the younger generation. Second, provide a variety of worship facilities for the majority group. Third, minority groups cater to the needs of people with disabilities by experiencing the splendor of the Jakarta International Stadium. This study also demonstrates that the construction of the Jakarta International Stadium can have political qualities because of the stimulus to regulate the pattern of power and authority so that it has public acceptance flexibility.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Abdullah, A., & Shalihati, F. (2020). Integrated Feasibility Studies: A Tool for Sustainable Development for Jakarta International Stadium BT - Proceedings of the First ASEAN Business, Environment, and Technology Symposium (ABEATS 2019). 133–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200514.031
Ardipandanto, A. (2020). Dampak Politik Identitas Pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme [The Impact of Identity Politics On President Election 2019: Populism Perspective]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 43–63.
Baoill, A. Ó. (2007). Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press. 336 pp. $29.95 (hardbound). Social Science Computer Review, 26(2), 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307306088
Barros García, J. M. (2020). Political artefacts, aesthetics and heritage: the Valley of the Fallen. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1620834
Bennett, L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. In The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: Metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.756095
Cajilig, P. G., & Salva, O. (2014). Creating Political Artifacts with Design Thinking: Shelter Prototype Development in a Disaster Context. Conference Paper for the 36th Annual Conference of UGAT (Uganayang Pang-AghamTao / Anthropological Association of the Philippines 23-25 Oct 2014 at St. Louis University, Baguio City
CNN Indonesia. (2022). Pengamat: Salat Id di JIS Pasti Dimanfaatkan Jadi Panggung Politik. cnnindonesia.com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220504055114-32-792786/pengamat-salat-id-di-jis-pasti-dimanfaatkan-jadi-panggung-politik
Coeckelbergh, M. (2009). The public thing: on the idea of a politics of artefacts. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 13(3), 175–181.
Darmadi, D., Rania, G., Fitriana, A. R. D., & Setiawan, A. B. (2021). Human Governance: Aksesibilitas Fasilitas Publik Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education, 8(2), 100–112.
Databoks.katadata.co.id. (2016). Indonesia Penggemar Bola Nomor Dua di Dunia. databoks.katadata.co.id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2016/12/08/indonesia-penggemar-bola-nomor-dua-di-dunia
Databoks.katadata.co.id. (2022). Pengguna Twitter Indonesia Masuk Daftar Terbanyak di Dunia, Urutan Berapa?. databoks.katadata.co.id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/03/23/pengguna-twitter-indonesia-masuk-daftar-terbanyak-di-dunia-urutan-berapa
Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized Campaigns In Party-Centred Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
Eriyanto. (2022). Analisis Jejaring Wacana. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Fuchs, C. (2012). The Political Economy of Privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media, 13(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476411415699
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social Media and Political Agenda Setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
Guillaume, X., & Huysmans, J. (2018). The concept of ‘the everyday’: Ephemeral politics and the abundance of life. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(2), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718815520
Hajer, M. (2002). Discourse analysis and the study of policy making. European Political Science, 2(1), 61–65.
Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Lu, W. (2017). Social media and political discussion: when online presence silences offline conversation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1218526
Hanif, H. (2022). Towards achieving Platinum standards for Green Building certification: a case study using Jakarta International Stadium (JIS) design. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 997(1), 12006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/997/1/012006
Hoffmann, C. P., & Suphan, A. (2017). Stuck with ‘electronic brochures’? How boundary management strategies shape politicians’ social media use. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200646
Jackson, M. (2016). Aesthetics, Politics, and Attunement: On Some Questions Brought by Alterity and Ontology. GeoHumanities, 2(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2016.1165076
Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411–431.
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662
Kiftiyah, A. (2019). Upaya rekonsiliasi politik identitas pasca pelaksanaan pemilu 2019 di Indonesia. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 3(1), 63-75. http://jurnalpusaka.lan.go.id/index.php/jurnalpusaka/article/view/59/46
Klein, E., & Robison, J. (2019). Like, Post, and Distrust? How Social Media Use Affects Trust in Government. Political Communication, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661891
Kompas.com. (2021a). Libatkan 5 Gubernur, Jakarta International Stadium Dibangun Selama 11 Tahun. kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/properti/read/2021/04/15/200000021/libatkan-5-gubernur-jakarta-international-stadium-dibangun-selama-11?page=all
Kompas.com. (2021b). Anies Bangga Proyek JIS Tak Serap Dana Hadiah Perusahaan, Benarkah?. kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/properti/read/2021/12/14/200000521/anies-bangga-proyek-jis-tak-serap-dana-hadiah-perusahaan-benarkah?page=all
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Lake, C. B. (2017). Ten thousand gimcracks: artifacts and materialism’s political history at Don Saltero’s. Word & Image, 33(3), 267–278.
Latuperissa, A. A. A. (2022). Pendekatan Public Relations Politik di Media Sosial dalam Pembentukan Citra Politik. Jurnal Public Relations (J-PR), 3(1), 9–17.
Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N., & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111416182
Maksudi, I. A. R. dan B. I. (2018). Peran Media Sosial Dalam Peningkatan Partisipasi Pemilih Pemula Dikalangan Pelajar Di Kabupaten Bogor. Sosiohumaniora - Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 20(2), 154–161.
Maulana, A., Kusumasari, B., & Giyarsih, S. R. (2021). Komunikasi Bencana di Twitter: Studi Kasus Bencana Banjir Perkotaan di Daerah Khusus Ibukota (DKI) Jakarta. Jurnal Kawistara, 11(2), 129–142.
Naufal, M. (2022). JIS, Stadion Politiknya Pak Anies Menyongsong Pilpres 2024. Kompas.com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/07/13/10545771/jis-stadion-politiknya-pak-anies-menyongsong-pilpres-2024?page=all
Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C. (2013). Do people “like” politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-scale direct candidate-to-voter online communication as an outlier phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7, 24.
Perdana, K. E. (2018). Sepakbola Sebagai Media Solidaritas Politik Bagi Supporter Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 8(2), 1-9.
Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539
Pramashela, F. S., & Rachim, H. A. (2021). Aksesibilitas Pelayanan Publik Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Di Indonesia. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 4(2), 225–232.
Prihatiningrum, S. (2020). Efektivitas Akun Instagram@ aniesbaswedan Dalam Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Publik (Analisis EPIC Model Pada Akun Instagram@ aniesbaswedan). Bachelor's thesis, Fakultas Ilmu Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Propiona, J. K. (2021). Implementasi Aksesibilitas Fasilitas Publik bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 10.
Rahmah, D. Y., & Kurniasari, N. (2020). Konstruksi Sosok Anies Baswedan dalam Pemberitaan Pembongkaran Bambu Getah Getih di Media Online Tempo. Co. KALBISIANA Jurnal Sains, Bisnis Dan Teknologi, 8(1), 645–653.
Rahmatulloh, R. (2018). Pembentukan Tim Gubernur Untuk Percepatan Pembangunan (TGUPP) Dalam Konteks Politik Pemerintahan Di Propinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 17(2), 111–133.
Republika.co.id. (2022). Benarkah JIS Dibangun Era Jokowi, Anies Hanya Gunting Pita?. Republika.co.id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rbilo3484/benarkah-jis-dibangun-era-jokowi-anies-hanya-gunting-pita-begini-faktanya
Sætnan, A. R., Schneider, I., & Green, N. (2018). The politics of Big Data: Principles, policies, practices. In The Politics of Big Data (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
Sahalatua, A. P., Hamid, A., & Hikmawan, M. D. (2018). Politik Identitas dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus pada Pemilihan Gubernur DKI Jakarta Periode 2017-2022). Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
Salvatore, A. (2013). New media, the “Arab Spring,” and the metamorphosis of the public sphere: Beyond Western assumptions on collective agency and democratic politics. Constellations, 20(2), 217–228.
Sari, E. (2016). Kebangkitan Politik Identitas Islam Pada Arena Pemilihan Gubernur Jakarta. KRITIS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 145–156.
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90, 28–41.
Sørensen, M. P. (2016). Political conversations on Facebook – the participation of politicians and citizens. Media, Culture & Society, 38(5), 664–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715620924
Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
Suryo, H., & Aji, H. K. (2020). Media Sosial dan Pesan Politik (Persepsi Pemilih Pemula Dalam Menerima Pesan Politik Pada Pemilihan Umum 2019 Melalui Media Sosial). Research Fair Unisri, 4(1).
Lubis, F. H., Nasution, F. A., & Harahap, R. H. (2024). The Commodification of Religious Rituals: Representations of Political Actors in Indonesian Elections. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.214
Triantoro, D. A. (2019). Praktik Politik Identitas dalam Akun Media Sosial Anies-Sandi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 16(1), 19–40.
Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., & Loader, B. (2015). Young people, social media and connective action: from organisational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.933198
Wijaya, L. D. (2022). Anies Baswedan Masukkan JIS Jadi Kawasan Strategis Sosial dan Budaya, Ada di RPD DKI 2023-2026 - Metro Tempo.co. https://metro.tempo.co/read/1637208/anies-baswedan-masukkan-jis-jadi-kawasan-strategis-sosial-dan-budaya-ada-di-rpd-dki-2023-2026
Winner, L. (2017). Do artifacts have politics? In Computer Ethics (pp. 177–192). Routledge.
Winner, L. (2022). Excerpt from Do Artifacts Have Politics?. In Ethics of Data and Analytics (pp. 13-19). Auerbach Publications.