Artificial Reproductive Technology: Cultural considerations through an African lens
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial Reproductive Technology (ART) as a variant of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming popular among Africans as an alternative to infertility among married couples. With the prioritization of fertility as an indispensable ingredient for sustaining family lineages, ART stands as a potential alternative for couples to shun the negative societal labels as a result of infertility after their marriage. Yet, issues about fertility are not just a couple’s affair but rather a societal affair in a typical African society. That notwithstanding, the processes in ART are acceptable to the traditional African cultural ideology of fertility and childbirth. This paper scholarly discusses the potential drivers and resistance to decisions of acceptance of ART in typical traditional African societies. It contends that due to the evolvement of culture, which is not a static phenomenon of societies, coupled with the pressure mounted on married couples by African families, the acceptance of ART holds promising grounds in Africa in the not-too-distant future.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Adamson, G.D. (2009). Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies. Women’s Health, 5(4): 351-358.
Adamu, C., O. (2023). Commercial Gestational Surrogacy and Afrocentrism: A Determination of the Nigerian Disposition. African Journal of Culture, History, Religion and Traditions 6(1): 63-80.
Akakpo, S. B. (2022). The State and Practice of African Traditional Medicine among the Ewe of Ghana: Contemporary Challenges and Prospects. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(10): 443-446.
Alhassan, A., Ziblim, A.R. & Muntaka, S. (2014). A survey on depression among infertile women in Ghana. BMC Women’s Health, 14: 1-6.
Aluko-Arowolo, S. O., & Ayodele, S. J. (2014). The effects of native culture and religious beliefs on human infertility and assisted reproductive treatment: A focus on the Ijebu people of Nigeria. African Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4): 88-102.
American Medical Association (2017). AMA backs global health experts in calling infertility a disease. https://wire.ama-assn.org/ama-news/ama-backs-global-health-experts-calling-infertility-disease (Accessed 26th July 2023).
Anaman-Torgbor, J.A., Jonathan, J.W.A., Asare, L., Osarfo, B., Attivor, R., Bonsu, A., Fialor, E.A. & Tarkang, E.E. (2021). Experiences of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in Ghana: a qualitative analysis of their experiences. Plos One, 16(8): e0255957.
Boivin, J., Carrier, J., Zulu, J.M. & Edwards, D. (2020). A rapid scoping review of fear of infertility in Africa. Reproductive Health, 17: 1-13.
Calleja, C. (2022). Injustices Implied in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies Market. The Linacre Quarterly, 89(4): 455-467.
Chimbatata, N.B. & Malimba, C. (2016). Infertility in sub-Saharan Africa: a Woman’s Issue for how long? A qualitative review of the literature. Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
Church, A.C., Ibitoye, M., Chettri, S. & Casterline, J.B. (2023). Traditional supports and contemporary disrupters of high fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Reproductive Health, 20(1): 1-16.
Connolly, M.P., Hoorens, S. & Chambers, G.M. (2010). The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Human Reproduction Update, 16(6): 603-613.
Czarnecki, D. (2015). Moral women, immoral technologies: How devout women negotiate gender, religion, and assisted reproductive technologies.Gender & Society, 29(5): 716-742.
Duke, E.O. & John, E.O. (2019). A Critical Evaluation of Traditional African Family System and Contemporary Social Welfare.Nduñòde, 15(1): 229-236.
Dyer, S., Archary, P., Potgieter, L., Smit, I., Ashiru, O., Bell, E. G. & Network, A. (2020). Assisted reproductive technology in Africa: a 5-year trend analysis from the African Network and Registry for ART. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 41(4): 604-615.
Egbodo, O. C., Akunaeziri, U. A., Edugbe, A. E., Shambe, I. H., Kahansim, M. L., & Ocheke, A. N. (2018). Awareness, Attitudes, and Perception of Antenatal Patients to Caesarean Section: The Jos, Nigeria Experience. Jos Journal of Medicine, 12(2): 48-60.
Fabamwo, A. O., & Akinola, O. I. (2013). The understanding and acceptability of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among infertile women in urban Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 33(1): 71-74.
Fernandez, E.I., Ferreira, A.S., Cecílio, M.H.M., Chéles, D.S., de Souza, R.C.M., Nogueira, M.F.G. & Rocha, J.C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory: overview through the application of different types of algorithms for the classification of reproductive data. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37: 2359-2376.
Hakim, A. ( 2022). Reasons for Polygamy and Its Impact on Muslim Family Life: Experiences of Polygamous Perpetrators in Babat, Lamongan, Indonesia. J. Islamic L., 3: 34.
Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. & Schicktanz, S. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of posthumous reproduction: The significance of the gender and margins-of-life perspectives. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4: 21-32.
Igbolekwu, C. O., Mkperedem, A. A., Arisukwu, O. C., Uwadinma-Idemudia, E., Iwuh, J. & Olawale, A. A. (2023). Religious and cultural interpretations of artificial insemination in South-West Nigeria. AJOG Global Reports, 3(2): 100113.
Jegede, A.S. & Fayemiwo, A.S. (2010). Cultural and ethical challenges of assisted reproductive technologies in the management of infertility among the Yoruba of Southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 14(2): 115-127.
Lantos, J. D. & Lauderdale, D. S. (2015). Preterm babies, fetal patients, and childbearing choices. MIT Press.
Magezi, V. (2015). Technologically changing African context and usage of Information Communication and Technology in churches: Towards discerning emerging identities in church practice (a case study of two Zimbabwean cities). HTS: Theological Studies, 71(2): 1-8.
Maule, L.S.& Schmid, K. (2006). Assisted Reproduction and the Courts; The Case of California.Journal of Family Issues, 27(4): 3-9.
Ndlovu, G.E. & Naidoo, M. (2023). Changing Africa: Reflections on family involvement in African Christian marriage. Missionalia: Southern African Journal of Mission Studies, 51(1): 5-20.
Obajimi, G. O., Ogunbode, O. O., Adetayo, C. O. & Ilesanmi, A. O. (2017). Acceptability of artificial insemination by donor among infertile women attending the Gynaecological Clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34(3): 207-211.
Okantey, G. N. O., Adomako, E. B., Baffour, F. D. & Lim, D. (2021). Sociocultural implications of infertility and challenges in accessing assisted reproductive technology: Experiences of couples from two health facilities in southern Ghana. Marriage & Family Review, 57(5): 375-396.
Ombelet, W. (2008). False perceptions and common misunderstandings surrounding the subject of infertility in developing countries. Human reproduction, 2008(1): 8-11.
Onwuka, O.M., 2023. Prospective loss of human reproductive functionality: An implication of artificial medical intelligence, its invention of sex robot machines and assisted reproductive technology. Advance Journal of Current Research, 8(2): 16-32.
Provoost, V., Van Rompuy, F. & Pennings, G. (2018). Non-donors’ attitudes towards sperm donation and their willingness to donate. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35, 107-118.
Sabatello, M. (2013). Are the kids all right? A child-centered approach to assisted reproductive technologies. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 31(1): 74-98.
Tkach, O. (2009). Making family and unmaking kin in the Russian media: Reproductive technologies and relatedness. Making bodies, persons, and families: Normalizing reproductive technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany. Zurich, Derlin: LIT, pp.135-158.
Ugwu, E. O., Odoh, G. U., Obi, S. N. & Ezugwu, F. O. (2014). Acceptability of artificial donor insemination among infertile couples in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Women’s Health: 201-205.
Vayena, E., Rowe, P.J. & Griffin, P.D. (2002). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a meeting on medical, ethical, and social aspects of assisted reproduction, held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.World Health Organization.