Using neuro-linguistic programming and transactional analysis tools to measure the English proficiency of foreign language learners

Main Article Content

Abdulrahman Almosa

Abstract

Various methods are used to evaluate the English skills of non-native learners. Two approaches within cognitive science have garnered attention lately due to their potential usefulness in learning a foreign language and improving an individual's interpersonal and communicative skills. They include Transactional Analysis (TA) and Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). Self-improvement, psycho-education, and language teaching extensively use these psychological methods for assessing and evaluating students' behaviour. Communication skills, such as consciousness, fearlessness, and others, are essential to teach English in the classroom and can be trained through methods like NLP and TA. This study focused on measuring different variables that underpin proficiency in a foreign language. The six variables measured in this study include speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills. Grammar and vocabulary proficiency were also measured. The measuring instrument was the NLP and TA tools, and the method adopted for the study is an experimental approach. Two hundred high school students participated in both the pretest and posttest. Both the researcher and some selected teachers administered the tests. The findings of the study affirm that the participants generally performed better across the skill sets for proficiency in the posttest, more than what is seen in the pretest. This indicates that the tools help measure and facilitate learning different FL proficiency skills. The study further revealed that the students performed better during the posttest in the TA test than in the NLP test. The findings also indicated that the students performed better in speaking and listening skills in both the posttests of NLP and TA tests. It is thus concluded that TA and NLP are critical tools to measure students' progress in certain areas of FL learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Almosa, A. (2023). Using neuro-linguistic programming and transactional analysis tools to measure the English proficiency of foreign language learners. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/5ryw2v96
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Almosa, A. (2023). Using neuro-linguistic programming and transactional analysis tools to measure the English proficiency of foreign language learners. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/5ryw2v96

References

Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1981). Frogs into Princes: Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Utah: Real People Press.

Barnes, D. (2018). Exploratory Talk for Learning. New Delhi: SAGE.

Berne, E. (2012). What Do You Say After You Say Hello? New York: Grove.

Bloom, B.S. (2016). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT journal, 52(3), 179-187.

Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F‐move. ELT journal, 56(2), 117-127.

De Jong, C., & Hawley, J. (1995). Making cooperative learning groups work. Middle School Journal, 26(4), 45-48.

Donato, R., & MacCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The modern language journal, 78(4), 453-464.

Fletcher, M. (2020). Teaching for Success. New York: Folkstone.

Gardner, H. E. (2011). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. Basic books.

Garrat, T. (2017). The Effective Delivery of Training Using NLP. London: Kogan Page.

Hardigham, A. (2018). Psychology for Trainers. London: The Cromwell Press.

Hall, J.K, and Walsh, M. (2020). "Teacher Student Interaction and Language Learning." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22.

James, M. (2019). Techniques in Transactional Analysis: An Introduction to Its Theory and Practice. London: PITMAN.

Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.

Lynch, T. (2011). Questioning Roles in Classroom." ELT Journal 45, 201-210.

McDonald, B. (2011). Self Assessment and Discovery Learning. Online Submission.

Millrood, R. (2004). The role of NLP in teachers’ classroom discourse. ELT journal, 58(1), 28-37.

Revell, J., & Norman, S. (1999). Handing over: NLP-based activities for language learning. Saffire Press.

Seymour, H. (2013). Introducing NLP. London: Thorsons.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press, USA.

Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2003). Neuro‐linguistic programming and learning theory: A response. The Curriculum Journal, 14(3), 371-388.

Van Lier, L. (2014). Analyzing Interaction in Second Language Classroom. ELT Journal 38, 160-169.