Pragmatic deviation of politeness principle in Trump’s political speeches
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current study aimed to pragmatically explore the deviation from Leech's (2014) politeness maxims in the former president of the US Donald Trump's political speeches. A qualitative approach was followed to collect and analyze the data. Two oral documents; an interview and a speech that were taken from YouTube were adopted in this study as an instrumentation. These documents, which were selected purposively to saturate the data, were Trump's interview with Fox News Channel reporters, Martha MacCallum and Bret Baier in Scranton on March 6, 2020, and Trump's direct speech to the crowd in Illinois on June 25, 2022, in support of his candidates to win the Congressional election. A discourse analysis method was used to examine the data. The findings showed that Trump from the maxims to convince the people that his opponents are unacceptable, elect Trump's candidates, influence the crowd to change their views of the world, ruin his rivals' image, show his period as the US president incomparable and better than any US presidents, deny accountability, reject to release others from blame, influence the public that the election was stolen to invoke wrath among his supporters, express his hatred towards others, and vent his own feelings to make people sympathetic to him.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Abdelkawy, H. (2019). Impoliteness in Arab Talk Shows: A case study of insult in The Opposite Direction. Journal of College Arts, 2(50), 71-98.
Akmal, M. & Candrasari, R. (2019). Language politeness in political communication: analysis of Leech's politeness principal on the Aceh governor candidate Debate in 2017. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multidisciplinary and Its Applications Part1 (1-8). htps://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.20-1-2018.2282435
Alemi, M. & Latifi, A. (2019). The realization of impoliteness in arguments between the democrats and republicans over the government shutdown issue in the US. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 83-97.
Azizah, A. & Alpiah, D. (2018). An analysis of illocutionary acts performed in Donald Trump’s victory speech in the United States election 2016. Professional Journal of English Education, 1(3), 241-248.
Atmowardoyo, H., Weda, S., & Nashruddin (2018). Politeness principle and its implication in EFL classroom in Indonesia. XLinguae, 11(4), 99-112.
Bowen, G. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 208-222.
Castiglione, D. (2013). The channel of (mis)communication: Semantic and pragmatic deviances in two poems by Geoffrey Hill and Susan Howe. PALA 2013 Proceedings online (1-17). Pala. https://www.pala.ac.uk/uploads/2/5/1/0/25105678/castiglione_2013.pdf
Chen, X., Yan, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). A corpus-based study of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s linguistic styles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 13-22.
Colaco, L., Vijayarajoo, A., & Lin, T. (2021). The use of impoliteness strategies in online feedback relating to a general election in media. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 107-121.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language, Cambridge University Press.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
El-Falaky, M. (2019). Impoliteness in Egyptian political campaign discourse: A pragmatic analysis of Mousa-Aboulfotouh presidential debate. International Journal of Language and Literature, 7(1), 92-102.
Ewurum, R. & Chukwu, E. (2021). Violations of politeness maxims in language of agitation in select Nollywood eco-films in English. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies, 10(4), 64-74.
Gusthini, M., Sobarna, C. and Amalia, R. (2018). A pragmatic study of speech as an instrument of power: analysis of the 2016 USA presidential debate. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(1), 97-113.
Hamza, M. and Abbood, H. (2020). Polysyndeton in Shakespeare's Othello: A case of grammatical deviation, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(3), 104-114.
Hamza, M. Hadi, H., and Ali, M. (2022). A pragmatic study of circumlocution in Former Iraqi PM Al-Maliki's political interviews. Res Militaris, 2(2), 5550–5565.
Hasan, B., Maca, S., & Moelier, D. (2021). The politeness principle actualization in Rodger and Hammerstein’s Drama King and I (a politeness study). Journal of Linguistics, Literature & Education, 1(1), 21-32.
Hashim, S. (2015). Speech acts in political speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5(7), 699-706.
Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge University Press.
Hikmahwati, E., Utomo, D., & Evenddy, S. (2021). The investigation of politeness principles and strategies used in Akeelah and the Bee movie. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 1-7.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence” In: J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Ibrahim, A. (2020). A socio-linguistic analysis of impoliteness in political tweets. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(1), 64-79.
Jameel, T & Sameer, I. (2021). Speech acts and politeness in Nixon and Bush's victory speech. Al-Adab Journal, 2(138), 13-32.
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kachru, B. (1992). The other tongue. University of Illinois Press.
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman Limited Group.
Leech, G. (1983). Principle of pragmatics. Routledge.
Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 167-206.
Leech, G. (2008). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. Routledge.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Leyang, W. & Xiaoting, F. (2021). An analysis of speech acts in Teahouse from the perspective
Lustyantie, N. & Dewi, F. (2019). Leech’s politeness principle in Lenong Betawi humorous dialogue entitled Anak Durhaka. Journal of English Education, 7(2), 133-142.
Naylor, B. (2021 February 9). Article of impeachment cites Trump's 'incitement' of capitol insurrection. The NBR. https://www.npr.org/sections/trump-impeachment-effort-live-updates/2021/01/11/955631105/impeachment-resolution-cites-trumps-incitement-of-capitol-insurrection
Mariani, P., Budiarsa, M., & Widiastuti, N. (2019). Politeness principles in “Donald Trump’s election victory speech". Humanis, 23(2), 95-100.
Merriam, S. & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey Bass.
Mufiah, N., & Rahman, M. (2018). Speech acts analysis of Donald Trump’s speech. Professional Journal of English Education, 1(2), 125-132.
Ogayi & Osondu, P. (2020). Violation of politeness maxims as a catalyst for tragedy: A study of Akachi Adimora-Ezeigbo’s Roses and Bullets. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 10(11), 1-12.
Polkinghorne, D. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137-145.
Pollack, J. (2017). Donald Trump and the future of U.S. leadership: Some observations on international order, East Asia, and the Korean Peninsula. {Paper presentation} in the 5th Korea Research Institute for National Strategy-Brookings Institution Joint Conference on "The Trump Administration in the United States and the Future of East Asia and the Korean Peninsula" https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/fp_20170208_jonathan_pollack_krins.pdf
Rahman, F. & Weda, S. (2019). Linguistic deviation and the rhetoric figures in Shakespeare’s selected plays. XLinguae, 12(2), 37-52.
Sclafani, J. (2018). Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, metadiscourse, and political identity. Routledge.
Taylor, S. (2001). Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 311-330). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Trump, D. (2020, March 6). Interview: Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum host a Town Hall with Donald Trump. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cukyV5UGuEE
Trump, D. (2022, June 25). Donald Trump rally at Illinois 6/25/22 save America rally 25 June 2022. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_H_D-F9D2k&t=2798s
Vanderstoep, S. and Johnston, D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. Jossey- Bass.
Wales, K. (2011). A dictionary of stylistics. Longman.
Yurcaba, J. (2022 February 1). Trump promises to ban transgender women from sports if re-elected. The NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/trump-promises-ban-transgender-women-sports-re-elected-rcna14248
Zidane, R. (2017). The exploitation of pragmatic deviation in literary discourse. Ulakbilge, 5(11), 507-531.