The race for global leadership and its risks for world instability: Technologies of controlling and mitigation
Main Article Content
Abstract
In today's ever-evolving geopolitical landscape, the pursuit of global leadership has become an intensifying competition that holds significant implications for global stability. This article explores the emergence of rivalry among major global powers as well as existing and potential consequences it poses for the world. Taking into account the shifting dynamics in international relations, the article highlights the primary contenders vying for global leadership and their distinct approaches to exerting influence on the world stage. It scrutinizes the escalating tensions between these powers as they strive to secure technological, economic, and military superiority, and how these rivalries can reverberate across different regions. The article examines the impact on international cooperation efforts, as rivalries may hinder collaboration on critical global issues such as climate change, security, and governance. Additionally, the study assesses the economic interdependency among nations and the potential disruptions that can arise as rival powers aim to shape the global order to their advantage. Addressing the potential consequences of this rivalry, the research explores into the risks of military escalation and arms races, highlighting the need for diplomatic efforts to mitigate conflict and promote peaceful resolutions. It also emphasizes the importance of fostering multilateral institutions and mechanisms for effective conflict resolution and cooperation among nations. The study presents relevant strategies to control and mitigate the risks associated with global instability.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Arbatli, E., & Rosenberg, D. (2021). United we stand, divided we rule: how political polarization erodes democracy. Democratization, 28(2), 285-307.
Bergsten, C. F., & Gagnon, J. E. (2017). Currency conflict and trade policy: A new strategy for the United States. Columbia University Press.
Berkley, S. (2019). The power of vaccines and how Gavi has helped make the world healthier: 2019 Lasker-Bloomberg Public Service Award. Jama, 322(13), 1251-1252.
Bloemen, P. J., Hammer, F., van der Vlist, M. J., Grinwis, P., & van Alphen, J. (2019). DMDU into practice: Adaptive Delta Management in the Netherlands. Decision making under deep uncertainty: From theory to practice, 321-351.
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, 1, 316-334.
Bradley, G. L., Babutsidze, Z., Chai, A., & Reser, J. P. (2020). The role of climate change risk perception, response efficacy, and psychological adaptation in pro-environmental behavior: A two nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101410.
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The Grand Chessboard: US Geostrategy for Eurasia. Harvard International Review, 48-53.
Coccia, M. (2015). General sources of general purpose technologies in complex societies: Theory of global leadership-driven innovation, warfare and human development. Technology in Society, 42, 199-226.
Dyrhauge, H. (2022). Energy Governance in Denmark. In Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe (pp. 593-617). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Economy, E. (2018). The third revolution: Xi Jinping and the new Chinese state. Oxford University Press.
EIA (2023). Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook. Retrieved from https://search.usa.gov/search?affiliate=eia.doe.gov&sort_by=&query=fuel+complex+based+on+domestic+consumption+in+the+United+States%2C+from+1980+to+2040
Erameh, N. I. (2017). Humanitarian intervention, Syria and the politics of human rights protection. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 517-530.
Garcia-Saltos, T. G., Ilyina, A., Kangur, A., Kunaratskul, T., Rodriguez, S., Ruta, M., et al.. (2023). Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. IMF. Retrieved from https://hlpf.un.org/sites/default/files/vnrs/2023/Geoeconomic%20Fragmentation%20and%20the%20Future%20of%20Multilateralism.pdf
Gethin, A., & Morgan, M. (2018). Brazil divided: Hindsights on the growing politicisation of inequality. WID. World Issue Brief, 3, 1989-2018.
Guo, H., Dou, C., Chen, H., Liu, J., Fu, B., Li, X., et al. (2023). SDGSAT-1: The world’s first scientific satellite for sustainable development goals. Sci. Bull, 68(1), 34-38.
Guzman, F. E. (2023). Essays on fiscal and monetary policy during economic crises. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Hampson, F. O., & Hart, M. (1999). Multilateral negotiations: Lessons from arms control, trade, and the environment. JHU Press.
Heywood, A. (2014). Global politics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hofmann, S. Z. (2021). 100 Resilient Cities program and the role of the Sendai framework and disaster risk reduction for resilient cities. Progress in Disaster Science, 11, 100189.
Hurd, I. (2020). International organizations: politics, law, practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hutsaliuk, O., Havrylova, N., Alibekova, B., Rakayeva, A., Bondar, Iu., & Kovalenko, Yu. (2023). Management of Renewable Resources in the Energy Sector: Environmental, Economic and Financial Aspects. Green Energy and Technology. Circular Economy for Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30800-0
Hutsaliuk, O., Yaroshevska, O., Kotsiurba, O., & Navolokina, A. (2020a). Exploring financial parameters and innovative orientation of banks as criteria for selecting financial partners for enterprises. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(1), 118–131.
Hutsaliuk, O., Yaroshevska, O., Shmatko, N., Kulko-Labyntseva, I., & Navolokina, A. (2020b). Stakeholder approach to selecting enterprise-bank interaction strategies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 42–55.
Jones, S., McCabe, R., & Palmer, A. (2023). Ukrainian Innovation in a War of Attrition. Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/ukrainian-innovation-war-attrition
Kennedy, P. (2022). Reflections on ‘capital’s cost-of-living crisis’. Critique, 50(4), 581-598.
Kentikelenis, A., & Stubbs, T. (2023). A thousand cuts: social protection in the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (2005). Global governance and democratic accountability. The global governance reader, 120-37.
Kolodiziev, O., Chmutova, I., & Lesik, V. (2018). Use of causal analysis to improve the monitoring of the banking system stability. Bank and Bank Systems, 13(2), 62–76.
Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. (2003). A neo‐Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803-829.
Li, C. (2022). Securing US Critical Infrastructure against Cyber Attacks. In Harvard model congress.
Liff, A. P., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2014). Racing toward tragedy?: China's rise, military competition in the Asia Pacific, and the security dilemma. International Security, 39(2), 52-91.
Luk, C. Y. (2019). Strengthening cybersecurity in Singapore: Challenges, responses, and the way forward. In Security Frameworks in Contemporary Electronic Government (pp. 96-128). IGI Global.
Makame, M. O., & Mwevura, H. (2019). Vulnerability and adaptation strategies of coastal communities to the associated impacts of sea level rise and coastal flooding. Climate Change and Coastal Resources in Tanzania: Studies on Socio-Ecological Systems’ Vulnerability, Resilience and Governance, 35-51.
Markopoulou, D., Papakonstantinou, V., & De Hert, P. (2019). The new EU cybersecurity framework: The NIS Directive, ENISA's role and the General Data Protection Regulation. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(6), 105336.
Martinez, J. A. C., Adarme, M. X. O., Turnes, J. N., Costa, G. A. O. P., De Almeida, C. A., & Feitosa, R. Q. (2022). A Comparison of Cloud Removal Methods for Deforestation Monitoring in Amazon Rainforest. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43, 665-671.
McNamara, R. S. (2004). The Fog of War: Eleven lessons from the life of Robert S. McNamara. Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. WW Norton & Company.
Mizutori, M. (2020). Reflections on the Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction: Five years since its adoption. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(2), 147-151.
Nelson, D. N. (2020). The Measurement of East European WTO “Reliability”. In Soviet Allies (pp. 2-41). Routledge.
Nicolaidis, K. (2022). Global PeaceTech: Unlocking the Better Angels of our Techne. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, (2022_66).
Nye Jr, J. S. (2011). The future of power. PublicAffairs.
O’Brien, L. (2023). Protecting Traditional British Values: Investigating Language and Issue Salience in Brexit Era United Kingdom. Universität Luzern. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Liam-Obrien-34/publication/373329147_Protecting_Traditional_British_Values_Investigating_Language_and_Issue_Salience_in_Brexit_Era_United_Kingdom/links/64e628010acf2e2b520d7bda/Protecting-Traditional-British-Values-Investigating-Language-and-Issue-Salience-in-Brexit-Era-United-Kingdom.pdf
Organski, A. F. (1968). World politics. Published by Knopf 2d ed. [rev.]
Parmisa, N., & Reid, R. S. (2021). Wildlife Conservation Innovations in a Rangeland under Rapid Change in Maasailand of Kenya. UKnowledge, University of Kentucky. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/24/4/8/
Paul, C., Clarke, C. P., & Grill, B. (2010). Victory has a thousand fathers: Sources of success in counterinsurgency. Rand Corporation.
Raiser, K., Kornek, U., Flachsland, C., & Lamb, W. F. (2020). Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 083006.
Rechsteiner, R. (2021). German energy transition (Energiewende) and what politicians can learn for environmental and climate policy. Clean technologies and environmental policy, 23, 305-342.
Roitman, S., & Recio, R. B. (2020). Understanding Indonesia’s gated communities and their relationship with inequality. Housing Studies, 35(5), 795-819.
Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2021). Ransomware case studies. Ransomware Revolution: The Rise of a Prodigious Cyber Threat, 65-91.
Sayler, K. M. (2020). Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.
Segal, A. (2016). The hacked world order: How nations fight, trade, maneuver, and manipulate in the digital age. Hachette UK.
Shultz, J. M., Walsh, L., Garfin, D. R., Wilson, F. E., & Neria, Y. (2015). The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill: the trauma signature of an ecological disaster. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 42, 58-76.
Simon, S. W. (2012). Conflict and diplomacy in the South China Sea. Asian Survey, 52(6), 995-1018.
Slaughter, A. M. (2017). The chessboard and the web: Strategies of connection in a networked world. Yale University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the era of Trump. WW Norton & Company.
Stuenkel, O. (2019). India-Brazil-South Africa dialogue forum (IBSA): the rise of the global South. Routledge.
Telford, S. (2020). Uptake Grant-The Humanitarian Data Exchange: Critical Decisions, Key Results and The Road Ahead. Institute in Development Strudies. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15635
The Global Risks Report (2023). Insight Report, 18th Edition. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf
Twumasi, N. Y. D., Shao, Z., & Orhan, A. (2019). Remote sensing and GIS methods in urban disaster monitoring and management–an overview. Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev, 3, 918-926.
Valentine, M., Gee, E., & Osanna Drake, B. L. (2022). Transparency at Sea: The United States Lags Behind. Oceana. Retrieved from https://usa.oceana.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/Transparency-at-Sea-The-U.S.-Lags-Behind-Report-FINAL.pdf
Van de Graaf, T. (2018). Battling for a shrinking market: oil producers, the renewables revolution, and the risk of stranded assets. The geopolitics of renewables, 97-121.
Waltz, K. N. (2003). The spread of nuclear weapons: a debate renewed. WW Norton.
Warner, J. F., & Meissner, R. (2021). Cape Town's “Day Zero” water crisis: A manufactured media event?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 64, 102481.
Wolfsthal, J. B. (2020). Why Arms Control?. Daedalus, 149(2), 101-115.
Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Gao, W., Wang, F., Zhou, N., Kammen, D. M., & Ying, X. (2019). A survey of the status and challenges of green building development in various countries. Sustainability, 11(19), 5385.
Zyoud, S. H. (2023). Analyzing and visualizing global research trends on COVID-19 linked to sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(6), 5459-5493.