Effectiveness of digital versus printed Arabic text on the literacy mathematics tasks of seventh- and eighth-grade students

Main Article Content

Yousef Abd Algani
Zehavit Gross

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that use of digital rather than printed texts improve student literacy (reading comprehension of Problem solving in mathematics) and boosts motivation. The current study examines the effectiveness of digital versus printed media on the literacy of seventh- and eighth graders in Arab schools in Israel. This is the first time this topic has been examined in this setting. The study uses a quantitative methodology that involved 132 students and 77 teachers from middle-schools in the Arab sector in Israel. Two questionnaires, the first for students and the second for teachers were distributed and the data were analyzed using SPSS. The results reveal that both seventh- and eighth-grade students perform better using digital rather than printed material. No discernible gender difference was found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abd Algani, Y., & Gross, Z. . (2024). Effectiveness of digital versus printed Arabic text on the literacy mathematics tasks of seventh- and eighth-grade students. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/9vg8xp70
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Abd Algani, Y., & Gross, Z. . (2024). Effectiveness of digital versus printed Arabic text on the literacy mathematics tasks of seventh- and eighth-grade students. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/9vg8xp70

References

Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel. (16 July 2018). Adalah's Position Paper: Proposed Basic Law: Israel - The Nation State of the Jewish People. (Retrieved 13.7.2021) https://www.adalah.org/uploads/.

Al-Awawdeh, N., & Kalsoom, T. (2022). Foreign Languages E-Learning Assessment Efficiency and Content Access Effectiveness During Corona Pandemic in University Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2124-2132.

Anderson, R. C., Pearson, P. D. (1984). “A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in

Reading Comprehension”. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research. New-York: Longman, pp. 255-291.

Avidov-Ungar, U., Amir, A. (2020). "What Hinders the Integration of Technology in Teaching? The Case of first language teachers”. Dapim 73, pp. 143-163.

Ayari, S. (1996). Diglossia and Illiteracy in the Arab World. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 9, pp. 243-253.

Ben-Yehuda, G., Ackerman R., Delgado P., Vargas K., Salmaron L. (2018). "A Comparison of Print-Based and Digital-Based Reading Comprehension: A Meta-analysis." Learning in the Technological Era. (Editors: Yoram Eshet-Alkalay, Ina Blau, Avner Caspi, Shir Etgar, Nitza Geri, Yoram Kalman, Vered Zilber-Verod). The Open University, pp. 34-39.

Eisenberg, E., Selivansky, O. (2019). Adapting Israel’s Education System for the Challenges of the 21st Century. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.

Elbro, C., Rasmussen, I., Spelling, B. (1996). Teaching reading to disabled readers with language disorders: A controlled evaluation of synthetic speech feedback. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, pp. 140-155.

Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). “Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs and Culture Intersect”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, pp. 255-284.

Hartas, C., Moseley, D. (1993). ‘Say that again, Please’: A Scheme to Boost Reading Skills Using a Computer with Digitised Speech”. In: Support for Learning Vol. 8 NO. 1, pp. 16-21.

Ibrahim, R. (2009). The Cognitive Basis of Diglossia in Arabic: Evidence from a Repetition Priming Study within and between Languages. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, pp. 95-105.

Ibrahim, R., Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Is Literary Arabic a Second Language for Native Arab Speakers? Evidence from a Semantic Priming Study. The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, pp. 51-70.

Lewin, C. (2000). “Exploring the Effects of Talking Book Software in UK Primary Classrooms”. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, pp. 149-157.

Magen-Nagar, N., Rotem A., Inbal-Shamir T., Dayan R. (2014). “The Effect of the National ICT Plan on the Changing Classroom Performance of Teachers”. In: Learner in the Technological Era. Y. Eshet-Alkalei, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, V. Zilber-Verod, Y. Yair (eds.). Raanana: The Open University, pp. 104-111.

Makhoul, B., Copti-Mshael, T. (2015). “The Development of Sociolinguistic Diglossic Knowledge in Oral-Literacy Mismatch Situations: Preliminary Findings from Palestinian Arabs”. Psychology, 6, pp. 1168-1179.

Makhoul, B., Olshtain, E.‏ 2018). Language ‏ Development among Speakers of Arabic in a Multilingual Society. ‏Raanana: Mofet Institute. ‏

Nagy, W., Townsend, D. (2010). Words as Tools: Learning Academic Vocabulary as Language Acquisition, 47, 1, pp. 91-108.

Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., Oakhill, J. (2005). “The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill”. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology. The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 227-247.

Peled, B., Magen-Nagar N. (2012). “Characteristics of Teachers in Computer-Based Learning Environment”. In: Learning in the Technological Era. Y. Eshet-Alkalei, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, Y. Yair, Y. Kalman (Eds.). Raanana: The Open University, pp. 212-221.

Pressley, M. (2000). What Should Comprehension Instruction be the Instruction of? In: M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. III, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 545-561.

Rama, (June 2020). “International Study to Assess Reading Literacy of Eighth Graders”. PIRLS, 2016 - Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, (Retrieved 14.7.2021): https://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Rama/PIRLS_2016_REPORT.pdf

Ross, C. S. (2002). Reading in a Digital Age. In G. E. Gorman (Ed.), The Digital Factor in Library and Information Services (pp. 91-111). International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2002/2003, London: Facet Publishing.

Roth, S. F., Beck, I. L. (1997). Theoretical and Instructional Implications of the Assessment of Two Microcomputer Word Recognition Programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, pp. 197-218.

Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). “The Impact of Phonemic and Lexical Distance on the Phonological Analysis of Words and Pseudowords in Diglossic Context”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, pp. 495-512.

Saiegh-Haddad, E., Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). “The structure of Arabic language and orthography”. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. M. Joshi (eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy. New York: Springer, pp. 3-28

Saiegh-Haddad, E., Gawi-Dekwar A., Hanna-Arshid H. (2021). “When Diglossia Encounters Developmental Disabilities: The Effect of the Phonological Distance between Spoken Arabic and Normal Arabic on Language and Reading Impairment”. In F. Nasser-Abu Alhija and M Israelashvili (eds.). Education in Arab Society in Israel. Mofet Institute, pp. 71-103.

State Comptroller. (2021). "The learning Environment in Post-Primary Schools as an Infrastructure for Imparting 21st Century Skills". (Annual Report 71b). Jerusalem, (Retrieved 27.7.2021): https://www.mevaker.gov.il/sites/DigitalLibrary/Documents/2021/71B/2021-71b-103-Labor-Market-Skills.pdf

Tov Li, A., Frish, Y. (2014). The Literary Journey. Kiryat Shmuel Haifa: Sha'anan Religious Academic College For education.

Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., Ring, J., Johnson, M. (1998). “Interactive Computer Support for Improving Phonological Skills”. In J. L. Metsala, & L. C. Ehri (eds.). Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 189-208.