Regional head leadership relations model in the perspective of power in Deli Serdang Regency, Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explain the Regional Head Leadership Model from the perspective of power in Deli Serdang Regency. The leadership style greatly influences the structure under it, both in terms of political party institutions and internal bureaucratic institutions. The leadership in Deli Serdang Regency comes from the same family but has different character; this also gives the uniqueness of the leadership relationship model that is carried out. This study used a phenomenological descriptive-analytical method with a qualitative approach. The results show that leadership and background factors strongly influence the relationship model. The characteristics of leader such as Ashari Tambunan who come from civil society are considered more populist considering the conditions in Deli Serdang Regency where the people are very diverse. So, the civilians are more flexible because they come from civil society, while the leadership model of the late Amri Tambunan, who came from bureaucrats, is synonymous with firmness and calmness in making decisions. The application of a combination of leadership types maintains its power in Deli Serdang Regency. The power that is exercised in Deli Serdang Regency has approaches of kinship, humanism and mutual cooperation in developing Deli Serdang Regency.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Abdurrahman, M. (2015). Political: Ilmu Politik, Demokrasi, Partai Politik dan Welfare State. Buku Litera.
Adithia. (2013). Analisis Hubungan Eksekutif dan Legislatif dalam Pembuatan Peraturan Daerah di Kota Palopo. E-Journal Ilmu Pemerintahan: Jurnal Politics UGM-Yogyakarta,.
Bappenas RI. (2021). Kabupaten Deli Serdang Berhasil Raih Terbaik 1 Penghargaan Pembangunan Daerah (PPD) Tahun 2021. https://portal.deliserdangkab.go.id/dberita-1168-kabupaten-deli-serdang-berhasil-raih-terbaik-1-penghargaan-pembangunan-daerah-ppd-tahun-2021.html
Barrington, L. (2013). Comparative Politics, Structures and Choices. Wadsworth.
Bathoro, A. (2011). Perangkap Dinasti Politik dalam Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Jurnal FISIP UMRAH, 2(2).
Bertens, K. (1998). Etika. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Blackmore, J. (1989). Educational Leadership: A feminist Critique and Reconstruction, inc: Smyth, J.Ed., Critical Perspective on EducationalLeadership. The Falmer Press.
Budiarjo, M. (2009). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Budiatri, A. P. (2015). Pelembagaan Sistem Kepartaian di Bawah Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia (1998-sekarang). Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 12(1), 33–56.
Burns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. A Guide for Practitioners, 1–14.
Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, Critic of Foucault: The Case of Empirical Social Science Against Double-Game-Philosophy. The- Ory, Culture and Society, 23(6), 73–98.
Curtis, B. (2002). Foucault on Governmentality and Population: The Impossible Discovery. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(4), 505–533.
Davis, R., & Owen, D. (1998). New Media and American Politics. Oxford University Press.
Deacon, R. (2002). An Analytics of Power Relations: Foucault on The History of Discipline. History of The Human Science, 15(1), 89–117.
Djati, W. R. (2013). Revivalisme Kekuastan Familisme dalam Demokrasi: Dinasti Politik di Aras Lokal. Jurnal Sosiologi Masyarakat.
Firman, M. (2017). Relasi Kekuasaan Legislatif-Eksekutif Dalam Presidential Multipartai di Indonesia. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(2), 2502–9185.
Firmansyah. (2011). Menegelola Partai Politik: Komunikasi dan Positioning Ideologi Politik di Era Demokrasi. Yayasan Oborn Indonesia.
Foucault, M. (1997). Subjectivity and Truth. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The New.
Gramsci, A. (2006). (I) History of Subaltern Classes; (ii) The Concept of “Ideology”; (iii) Cultural Themes: Ideological Material dalam Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks (Victoria Australia: Blackwell Publishing). (Ed. M. G. Durham&D. M. Kellner). Blackwell Publishing.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2000). Behavior in Organizations Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work, Prentice. Hall International.
Hall, S. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hanan, D. (2014). Menakar Presiden-sialisme Multipartai di Indonesia: Upaya Mencari Format Demokrasi yang Stabil dan Dinamis dalam Konteks Indonesia. Mizan Media Utama.
Haryatmoko. (2002). Kekuasan melahirkan Anti Kekuasaan. Jurnal Basis No 01- 02 Tahun Ke-51.
Haryatmoko, J. (2003). Etika Politik dan Kekuasaan. Kompas.
Hasan, B. (2020). Pola Hubungan Eksekutif dan Legislatif Dalam Penyelenggaraaan di Daerah. Jurnal Geuthee.
Hicken, A. (2011). Clentalism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 289.
J Henn, S. (2018). Complements or Substitutes: State Presence and the Power of Traditional Leaders, Political Science. Political Science, 81(2), 98–275.
J, K. (2003). Kepala Daerah: Pola Kegiatan, Kekuasaan dan Perilaku Kepala Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Keefer, P. (2005). Democratization and Clientalism: Way Are Young Democracies Badly Governed? World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 3594.
Kemendagri. (2021). Berita Kemendagri. https://www.kemendagri.go.id/
Kendall, K., & Paine, S. (1995). Political Image and Voting Decisions (In: KL Hacker). Praeger.
Komariah, D. S. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
KPUD Deli Serdang. (2018). Paslon Bupati /Wakil Bupati DS H Ashari Tambunan/Drs H M Ali Yusuf Siregar MAP,Ditetapkan. https://portal.deliserdangkab.go.id/dberita-326-paslon-bupati-wakil-bupati-ds-h-ashari-tambunandrs--h-m-ali--yusuf-siregar-mapditetapkan.html
KumparanNews. (2020). Kronologi Konflik DPRD dengan Bupati Jember yang Berujung Pemakzulan. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/kronologi-konflik-dprd-dengan-bupati-jember-yang-berujung-pemakzulan-1tr6th2ToOJ
Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics. Harvard University Press.
O’Donnell, C. (1955). Principles of management: An analysis of managerial functions. McGraw-Hill.
Rivai, V. (2007). Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Romli, L. (2018). Pilkada Langsung,Calon Tunggal dan Masa Depan Demokrasi Lokal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(2), 143–160.
Saguni, F. (2014). Pemberian Stereotype Gender. Musawa, 6(2).
Sjamsudin, N. (1993). Dinamika Sistem Politik Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wasistiono, S. (2003). Etika Hubungan Legislatif-Eksekutif Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Fokus Media.
Wasistiono, S. (2013). Pengantar Ekologi Pemerintahan. IPDN Press. https://ilms.jabarprov.go.id/inlislite31/opac/detail-opac?id=17634