Homoeroticism and misogyny in T. S. Eliot’s Life and The Waste Land
Main Article Content
Abstract
There has been a renewed interest in reading the life story of T. S. Eliot by Gordon (2012) along with that of his first wife Vivienne Haigh Wood by Seymour-Jones (2009) with adjuvant scholarship on the poet’s ‘deviant sexuality’ and disavowed homoeroticism. The biographical approach took a new turn in Eliot’s case especially after the publication of Inventions of the March Hare (1996), which not only exposed or let’s say help ‘out’ the closeted poet. The paper uses Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s ‘Paradigm of the Closet,’ and Koestenbaum’s idea of ‘male literary collaboration’ to complicate the study of a celebrated author who enthralled a whole century of readers. While the author seems not to die despite Barthes dictum, the paper problematises the author/poet/character nexus in The Waste Land and suggests that the detestable portrayal of women and their sexuality in the poem reflects a conspicuous psychic manifestation of repressed homosexuality, which engenders serious anxiety of the feminine. The bleakness of his magnum opus The Waste Land, read in the failed sexual encounters, is forced onto the feminine. However, “outing Eliot” here should not be read as homophobic, and on the contrary the paper works its way down to demonstrate how psychological manifestations of a repressed homosexuality in the author enthralled a whole generation, till it turned out that societies of modern times can at times be tricked into celebrating misogyny.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Ackroyd, P. (1984). TS Eliot: a life. Simon & Schuster.
Aiken, C. (1966). An anatomy of melancholy. The Sewanee Review, 74(1), 188-196.
Ayers, D. (2020). English Literature of the 1920s. Edinburgh University Press.
Berberich, C. (2016). The image of the English gentleman in twentieth-century literature: Englishness and nostalgia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474400503
Bibb, A. (2011). Death by Water: A Reevaluation of Bradleian Philosophy in The Waste Land. The Waste Land at 90: A Retrospective, Vol. 12, 73. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200776_006
Booth, A. (2015). “sylvan scene”: Milton’s Paradise Lost. In Reading The Waste Land from the Bottom Up (pp. 91-94). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482846_18
Bowen, J. (1994). The Politics of Redemption: Eliot and Benjamin. The Waste Land, 31-54.
Brisbois, M. (2013). Voices Out of a Barren Land: An Approach to Teaching TS Eliot’s The Waste Land. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 13(3), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2266441
Brooker, J. S. (2018). TS Eliot’s Dialectical Imagination. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5339570.
Brooker, J. S., & Bentley, J. (1992). Reading The Waste Land: Modernism and the limits of interpretation. Univ of Massachusetts Press.
Buurma, R. S., & Heffernan, L. (2018). The Classroom in the Canon: TS Eliot’s Modern English Literature Extension Course for Working People and The Sacred Wood. PMLA, 133(2), 264-281. doi:10.1632/pmla.2018.133.2.264
Bush, R. (2009). T.S. Eliot: The modernist in history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, J. (2007). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. routledge.
Churchill, S. W. (2005). Outing TS Eliot. Criticism, 47(1), 7-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23127301
Cole, M. (2004). The Other Orpheus: A Poetics of Modern Homosexuality. Routledge.
Dean, T. J. (2004). TS Eliot, famous clairvoyante. In Gender, Desire, and Sexuality in TS Eliot (pp. 43-65). Cambridge University Press.
DuPlessis, R. B. (2002). Propounding Modernist Maleness: How Pound Managed a Muse. Modernism/modernity, 9(3), 389-405. doi:10.1353/mod.2002.0045
Eliot, T. S. (1963). Collected poems: 1909-1962. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Eliot, T. S. (2009). The Letters of TS Eliot: 1923-1925/General Ed.: John Haffenden. Faber & Faber.
---. (2011). The Letters of T.S. Eliot 1898-1922. New York: Faber and Faber.
Eliot, T. S., & North, M. (2001). The waste land: Authoritative text, contexts, criticism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Eliot, T. S., Eliot, V., & Haffenden, J. (2013). The letters of T.S. Eliot. London: Faber.
---. (2016). The letters of T.S. Eliot: 1932-1933. Vol. 6. London: Yale University Press.
---. (2009). On poetry and poets. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Eliot, T. S., & Ricks, C. (1996). Inventions of the March Hare: poems 1909-1917. London: Faber and Faber.
Ellmann, M. (2013). The Poetics of Impersonality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Felski, R. (2000). Doing time: Feminist theory and postmodern culture. New York: New York University Press.
Flanzbaum, H. (2007). Eliot’s Troubled Sexuality. English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 50(1), 120-124. doi:10.1353/elt.2007.0002.
Gallivan, P. (1975). ‘The Comic Spirit’ and The Waste Land. University of Toronto Quarterly, 45(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.45.1.35
Gordon, L. (2012). The imperfect life of TS Eliot. Hachette UK.
Haffenden, J., Eliot, T. S., & Eliot, V. (2014). The Letters of TS Eliot Volume 5: 1930-1931 (5). Faber & Faber.
Harding, J. (Ed.). (2011). TS Eliot in Context. Cambridge University Press.
Hartmann, H. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(3, Part 2), 137-169. https://doi.org/10.1086/493283
Houle, M. (2017). Queer Affect in TS Eliot’s Early Poetry.
Jabeen, T., Kumar, T., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). Fathers, daughters, and domesticity in the early novels of George Eliot. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402211138 21.
Koestenbaum, W. (2017). Double talk: The erotics of male literary collaboration. Ann Arbor, Mich: Univ. Microfilms Internat.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror (Vol. 98). University Presses of California, Columbia and Princeton.
Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity and mental illness: So many studies, so many wrong conclusions. Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice, 199-204.
Kumar, T. (2022). Semiotic Analysis of Train in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. World Journal of English Language, 12(2), pp. 168-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel. v12n2p169.
Kumar, T. (2020). Representation of victorian society in the poetry of Mary Howitt. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana. 25(12), 215-221. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.4280128.
Laity, C., & Gish, N. K. (Eds.). (2004). Gender, Desire, and Sexuality in TS Eliot. Cambridge University Press.
Lamos, Colleen. (2009). Deviant Modernism: Sexual and Textual Errancy in T.s Eliot, James Joyce, and Marcel Proust. Cambridge Univ Pr.
---. (2004). The Other Orpheus: A Poetics of Modern Homosexuality. Routledge.
Lee, H. (2001). Guilt by Dissociation. TLS, 148(5), 3.
Lyon, J. (1999). Manifestoes: Provocations of the modern. Ithaca (N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Mayer, J. T. (1989). TS Eliot’s silent voices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 8(4), 635-658. https://doi.org/10.1086/494000
McDonald, G. (2004). ‘Through Schoolhouse Windows: Women, the Academy, and TS Eliot’ (pp. 177-194). Cambridge University Press.
McIntire, G. (2007). Discovering modernism: TS Eliot and his context. Oxford University Press.
---. (2008). Modernism, memory, and desire: TS Eliot and Virginia Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
---. (Ed.). (2015). The Cambridge companion to The waste land. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Menand, L. (2002). The Women Come and Go. The New Yorker, 30.
Miller, J. E. (2005). T.S. Eliot: The making of an American poet, 1888-1922. University Park (Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mitroff, I. I. (2004). Think like a sociopath, act like a saint. Journal of business strategy.
Moody, D. A. (2009). The Cambridge companion to T.S. Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, M. (1999). Reading 1922: A Return to the Scene of the Modern. Oxford University Press.
---. (2001). The Waste Land: A Norton Critical Edition. N Norton.
Pech, R. J., & Slade, B. W. (2007). Organisational sociopaths: rarely challenged, often promoted. Why?. Society and business review.
Peter, J. (1952). A new interpretation of The Waste Land. Essays in Criticism, 2(3), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/II.3.242
---. (1969). A New Interpretation of The Waste Land (1952). Essays in Criticism, 19(2), 140-175. https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/XIX.2.140
Pinkney, T. (1984). Women in the poetry of T.S. Eliot: A psychoanalytic approach. London: Macmillan.
Pondrom, C. N. (2005). TS Eliot: The Performativity of Gender in The Waste Land. Modernism/modernity, 12(3), 425-441. doi:10.1353/mod.2005.0098.
Query, P. (2002). “THEY CALLED ME THE HYACINTH GIRL” T.S. Eliot and the Revision of Masculinity. Yeats Eliot Review, 18, 10-21.
Scott, B. K. (1995). Refiguring Modernism: Women of 1928 (1). Indiana University Press.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire. New York: Columbia University Press.
---. (2008). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Seymour-Jones, C. (2009). Painted shadow: The life of Vivienne Eliot, first wife of TS Eliot and the Long-Suppressed Truth about Her Influence on Eliot. Anchor.
Sicker, P. (1984). The Belladonna: Eliot’s Female Archetype in The Waste Land. Twentieth Century Literature, 30(4), 420-431.
Simonton, D. K. (2014). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–480.
Staten, H. (1995). Eros in mourning: Homer to Lacan. Baltimore (Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stockton, Sharon. (2021). ECONOMICS OF FANTASY: Rape in twentieth-century literature. S.l.: OHIO STATE UNIV PRESS.
Van Deurzen, E. (2010). Everyday mysteries: Existential dimensions of psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Vendler, H. (1998). TS Eliot. Time, 151(22), 111-113.