A critical analysis of horn of Africa’s drought-related metaphors: A socio-cognitive approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper regulates a corpus-based analysis of Horn of Africa’s drought-related metaphorical schemas presented in 17 selected reports and appeals published in the official homepages of UNICEF and OCHA in the time span (2021-2023). The study follows Hart’s (2008 & 2010) theoretical framework of socio-cognitive critical metaphor analysis (SCCMT) which connects blending integration theory (BT) and the critical, social and ideological tenets of critical discourse analysis (CDA). The findings of the study show three recurrent metaphorical integration networks in the selected corpus and they are: DROUGHT is A KILLING MONESTER, DROUGHT is WAR/STRUGGLE and UNICEF/OCHA are BUILDERS/ANIMATE AGENTS. Consequently, some emergent scenarios are activated such as: fear, instability, blame, hope and ideological distinction of US and THEM, THE POOR and THE RICH, AFRICA and AMERICA & EUROPE. Moreover, four topoi are motivated: “topos of danger”, “topos of displacement”, “topos of number” and” topos of hope”. These topoi are entrenched in the selected corpus, thus explicating the conventionality of metaphor.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
References:
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, v. (2007). A Glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburg University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1988). Language ad power. United States: Longman Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M., (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A.E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113-130). Stanford, California: CSLI Publications. https://www.academia.edu/80170223/Blending_as_a_central_process_of_grammar.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, New York.
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (1999). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the 5th international cognitive linguistics conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (Vol. 175). John Benjamins Publishing
Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse processes, 48(8), 529-562.
Hart, Ch. (2008). Critical Discourse Analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies. 5 (2) :91-106. https://www.academia.edu/150731/Critical_Discourse_Analysis_and_Metaphor_Toward_a_Theoretical_Framework.
Hart, Ch. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. UK: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
Hart, Ch. (2017a). Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of (1984-1985) British miners' strike: A multimodal analysis. Discourse &Society, 11(1): 3-30.
Hart, Ch. (2017b). Riots Engulfed the City’: An Experimental Study Investigating the Legitimating Effects of Fire Metaphors in Discourses of Disorder. Discourse &Society, 29(3), 3-30. http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/christopherhart/files/2018/05/riots-engulfed-the-city.pdf.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kovecses, Z. (2004). Introduction: Cultural variation in metaphor. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 263-274. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233459871_Introduction_Cultural_Variation_In_Metaphor.
Kovecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McGlone, M. (2007). What Is the Explanatory Value of a Conceptual Metaphor? Language & Communication, 27, 109-126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222572818_What_Is_the_Explanatory_Value_of_a_Conceptual_Metaphor.
Tendahl, M. & Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.
Wei, L. (2016). Rethinking Critical Metaphor Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(2), 92-98. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijel/article/download/58556/31344.
Wezenberg, A. (2015). Entrenchment of conceptual blends in patterns of metaphor use during reconciliation talks. BA thesis. Vriji University.
https://www.unicef.org/stories/climate-drought-horn-of-africa