‘Millennials and centennials' perspective on streaming narratives in Spain and Mexico: Spiral of silence, bandwagon effect, and third person effect

Main Article Content

Carlos Fernández-Rodríguez
Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez
Belén Puebla-Martínez

Abstract

Viewers are increasingly used to the link between entertainment and technology in the current media ecosystem. The success of consuming streaming platforms when watching movies and series shows how the audience is more involved in new forms of viewing, at any time, at any moment, and with any content. This research aimed to examine the perception of millennial and centennial audiences in Spain and Mexico, the two Spanish-speaking countries with the highest streaming consumption, about audiovisual content producers for entertainment. Three theories on public perception (spiral of silence, bandwagon effect, and third-person effect) were used as the basis of the research questions to unravel the extent to which younger audiences in these countries consider that production companies are, or are not, ethical in the representation of what may be labeled as "sensitive topics". The results show that centennials are more confident in their critical perceptions of controversial issues in movies and series, while, on the other hand, millennials approach their perceptions with more cautiousness and confusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fernández-Rodríguez, C., Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., & Puebla-Martínez, B. . (2023). ‘Millennials and centennials’ perspective on streaming narratives in Spain and Mexico: Spiral of silence, bandwagon effect, and third person effect. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i3.1217
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Fernández-Rodríguez, C., Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., & Puebla-Martínez, B. . (2023). ‘Millennials and centennials’ perspective on streaming narratives in Spain and Mexico: Spiral of silence, bandwagon effect, and third person effect. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i3.1217

References

Aguilar-Barojas, S. (2005). Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud. Salud en Tabasco, 11 (1-2). https://bit.ly/3uVpMKo

Banning, S. & Sweetser, K. (2007). How Much Do They Think It Affects Them and Whom Do They Believe?: Comparing the Third-Person Effect and Credibility of Blogs and Traditional Medi. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 451- 466. 10.1080/01463370701665114

Barlovento Comunicación (2021). 4º ola. Barómetro TV-OTT. TV de pago y OTTS. Barloventocomunicación.es. https://bit.ly/3IV4eCS

Barnfield, M. (2019). Think Twice before Jumping on the Bandwagon: Clarifying Concepts in Research on the Bandwagon Effect. Political Studies Review, 18(4), 553-574. doi:10.1177/1478929919870691

Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton University Press.

Boyle, M., McLeod, D., & Rojas, H. (2008). The role of ego enhancement and perceived message exposure in third-person perception judgments concerning violent video games. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 165-185. doi:10.1177/0002764208321349

Casal, J. & Mateu, E. (2003). Tipos de muestreo. Revista de epidemiología y medicina preventiva, 1, 3-7. https://bit.ly/379DT6x

Chevalier Naranjo, S. (16 de septiembre de 2020). El auge de las plataformas de streaming en América Latina. estatista.com. https://bit.ly/3ryTQuZ

Chia, S. C. (2009). When the East meets the West: An examination of third-person perceptions about idealized body image in Singapore. Mass Communication and Society, 12, 423-445. doi:10.1080/15205430802567123

Conners, J. (2005). Undersatanding the Third-person Effect. Communication research trends, 24(2), 2-43.

Contreras Orozco. J. & Pablo Porras. I. (2016). Espiral del silencio en redes sociales. En: Comunicación, ciberperiodismo y nuevos formatos multimedia interactivos (pp. 90-111). Egregius ediciones.

Davison, W. (1983). The third person-effect in communication. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1-15. https://bit.ly/3MEJAd6

Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., Shepherd, C. D., Heugel, A., & Faulk, D. (2018). Do they shop 314 to stand out or fit in? The luxury fashion purchase intentions of young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 35(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21082

Farjam, M. (2021). The bandwagon effect in an online voting experiment with real political organisations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa008

Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., & Kugler, M. B. (2007). Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology, 28(2), 165–192. doi:10.1111/ pops.2007.28.issue-2

Franklin, T. & Shyan, S. (2020). Bandwagon effects in social television: How audience metrics related to size and opinion affect the enjoyment of digital media. Computers in human behaviour, 107, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106270

Guerrero-Solé, F. (2013). El efecto tercera persona en el caso de los medios, la publicidad y contenidos controvertidos. Tripodos, (33), 121-132. https://bit.ly/3J8o3Y8

Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x

Hahn, K., Lee, H., Ha, S., Jang, S. & Lee, J. (2017): The Influence of "Social Viewing" on Televised Debate Viewers. Political Judgment, Political Communication, 1-19. 10.1080/10584609.2017.1354947

Hernández-Pérez, T., Rodríguez-Mateos, D. (2016). Medición integral de las audiencias: sobre los cambios en el consumo de información y la necesidad de nuevas métricas en medios digitales. Hipertext.net, (14). http://doi.org/10.2436/20.8050.01.32

Ho, S. S., Detenber, B. H., Malik, S., & Neo, R. L. (2012). The roles of value predispositions, communication, and third person perception on public support for censorship of films with homosexual content. Asian Journal of Communication, 22, 78-97. doi:10.1080/01292986 .2011.622775

IAB México (9 de junio de 2017). Millennials: Estudio de consumo de medios entre internautas y mexicanos 2017. Iabmexico.com. https://bit.ly/3NJxz6D

INE. (1 de julio de 2021). Cifras de Población, Ambos sexos, Edad, Total Nacional, 1 de julio de 2021. Ine.es. https://bit.ly/3xaMwIO

INEGI. (2020). Censo de Población y vivienda. Inegi.org.mx. https://bit.ly/3LOF2zn

Kushin, M. J., Yamamoto, M., & Dalisay, F. (2019). Societal Majority, Facebook, and the Spiral of Silence in the 2016 US Presidential Election. Social Media + Society 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119855139

Laicock, R. (28 de julio de 2021). Estadísticas de streaming en España. Finder.com. https://bit.ly/35MulOe

López-Bonafont. (2011). La espiral del silencio, los movimientos sociales y la web 2.0. En: Libertades de expresión e información en Internet y las redes sociales: ejercicio, amenazas y garantías (pp. 222-225). Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia. https://bit.ly/35QPNBQ

Noelle-Neumann, E. (2010). Turbulencias en el clima de opinión: Aplicaciones Metodológicas de la Teoría de la Espiral del Silencio. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación 15, 301 - 318. https://bit.ly/3vVyGJK

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). La espiral del silencio. La opinión pública y los efectos de los medios de comunicación. Communication & society, 6(1-2). https://doi.org/10.15581/003.6.35558

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication 24, 43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x

Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person Effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/5.2.167

Perloff, R. M. (1996). Perceptions and conceptions of political media impact: The thirdperson Effect and beyond. In A. Crigler (Ed.), The Psychology of Political Communication (pp. 177-197). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Poulakidakos, S., Veneti, A. and Frangonikolopoulos, C. (2018). Post-truth, propaganda and the transformation of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 14 (3), 367-382. 10.1386/macp.14.3.367_1

Quintas-Froufe, N. & González-Neira, A. (2016). Consumo televisivo y su medición en España: camino hacia las audiencias híbridas. El profesional de la información, 25(3), 376-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.07

Rosenthal, S., Detenber, B. H., & Rojas, H. (2018). Efficacy Beliefs in Third-Person Effects. Communication Research, 45(4), 554–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215570657

Santillán Buelna, J. R. (2015). Teorías de la comunicación y opinión pública | Theories of Communication and Public Opinion. Razón Y Palabra, 19(2_90), 672–684. https://bit.ly/3pSUzWw

Shim, K., Klive, S-K. (2018). Who creates the bandwagon? The dynamics of fear of isolation, opinion congruency and anonymity-preference on social media in the 2017 South Korean presidential election. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 181-189. 10.1016/j.chb. 2018.04.012

Statista Research Department. (2 de julio de 2021). Streaming en América Latina – Datos estadísticos. Statista.com. https://bit.ly/3oph04J

Soriano Rodríguez, A. M. (2015). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Diá-Logos, (14), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.5377/dialogos.v0i14.2202

Sun, Y., Pan, Z. D., & Shen, L. J. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280-300. doi:10.1111/j.1460- 2466.2008.00385.x

Sundar, S. S. (2008). The main model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger, & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Tamayo, G. (2001). Diseños muestrales en la investigación. Semestre económico, 4(7), 1-14. https://bit.ly/3ulSZzg

Valdez, A. & Amparo. D. (2011). ¿Qué mueve a los votantes? Un análisis de las razones y sinrazones del comportamiento político del elector. Razón y Palabra, (75). https://bit.ly/3utpKt4

Wei, R., & Lo, V. H. (2013). Examining sexting's effect among adolescent mobile phone users. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 11, 176-193. doi:10.1504/ ijmc.2013.052640

Werder, S. (2013). ¿Ficción o hiperrealidad? Un estudio comparado de los relatos "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis tertius״ ,de Jorge Luis Borges y "La salida״ ,de Daniel Kehlmann”. Literatura y lingüística, (28), 127-121, http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716- 58112013000200007