Of a Free Man: Downplaying colonial crisis in the discourse of V. S. Naipaul
Main Article Content
Abstract
V. S. Naipaul was one of the most prolific writers of the modern time. His writings fluctuate between a sense of psychological crisis triggered by collapse of colonization towards the midst Twentieth century and the meaning of a free man. In other words, his writings look at what does it take to be a free man in a decolonized world; whether this freedom is achieved at the cost of the crisis or within the crisis, or whether the crisis itself is a part of the freedom. However, the understanding of the answer to these questions in his readers seems to be very limiting. The sense of the crisis and the freedom in him has been understood as something narrowing and damaging. However, this can be contested and the sense of crisis, its cause and affect can be best understood with a point of reference to the idea of “irresponsibility” and “contamination” in Jacques Derrida and Gayatri Spivak. His discourse is a meditation on several world contexts- Indian, European, African and Caribbean for instance. This paper contends to say and establish that the sense of crisis in Naipaul as far as his writings on the Caribbean context are concerned, is not damaging, rather it is an enabling phenomenon ensuring a sense of freedom.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Argyle, B. (2002). Commentary on V. S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas: A West Indian Epic. Caribbean Quarterly, 2/3(48), 109-118, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40654284
Bagai, L. B. (1962). A House for Mr. Biswas by V. S. Naipaul.” Books Abroad, (4)36, 453, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40117291
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Bhat, Y. (2002). Civilization, History and V. S. Naipaul’s Fictions. V. S. Naipaul: Critical Essays, ed. Mohit K. Ray, Atlantic, 53-68.
Chakrabarti, S. (2005). Alienation and Home: A Study of A House for Mr. Biswas. V. S. Naipaul: Critical Essays, ed. Mohit K. Ray, Atlantic, 45-52.
Charles, H. (2022). V. S. Naipaul: Native Son. Caribbean Quarterly, 48(2/3), pp. 22-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40654265
Culhaoglu, T. (2015). Construction of Identity in V. S. Naipaul’s Mimic Men. The Journal of International Social Research, (8)38, 88-103, https://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt8/sayi38pdf/1dil_edebiyat/culhaoglu_tahsin.pdf
Davies, B. (1972). The Personal Sense of a Society-Minority View: Aspects of the “East Indian” Novel in the West Indies. Studies in the Novel, 2(4), 284-295, https://www.jstor.org/stable/29531521
Dayan, J. (1993). Gothic Naipaul. Transition, (59), 158–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2934881
Dexu, Z. (2016). Uncomfortable Identity and Ethical Knowledge in V.S. Naipaul’s The Enigma of Arrival. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 42(1), 147-167. doi.org/10.6240/concentric.lit.2016.42.1.07
Dizayi, S. A. H. (2019). Postcolonial Identity Crisis in The Mimic Men: A Novel by V. S. Naipaul. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 3(7), 920-926. https://www.ijsrm.in/index.php/ijsrm/article/view/2084
Farred, G. (2002). Living in Crowded Houses: The Dialogic of Alienation in the Function of C.L.R. James and V. S. Naipaul. The CLR James Journal, 9(1), 95-115.
Freud, S. (2010). The Interpretation of Dreams, New York: Basic Books.
Ghisalbherti, G. (2009). And the World Continues Our Private Fabrication: An Autobiography of “Shipwreck” and Disorder in V. S. Naipaul’s ‘The Mimic Men’. Journal of Caribbean Literatures, 1(6), 73-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40986301
Guerre, J. G. L., & Cherita, G. (1972). The General Elections of 1946 in Trinidad and Tobago. Social and Economic Studies, 21(2). 184-204, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27856528
Hapugoda, M. (2018). Heideggerian Out-of-Joint Situation and New Horizons in Postcolonial Literature: Interpreting the Zizekian ‘Extimacy’ in The Mimic Men by V.S. Naipaul. Sabaragamuwa University Journal, 16(1), 41-52.
Hurwitz, M. J. (2012). 1960s travel fiction and Englishness during the Postimperial Turn. University of New Hampshire. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1668&context=dissertation
Iyer, N. S. (2005). A House for Mr. Biswas: A Study in Cultural Predicament. V. S. Naipaul: Critical Essays, ed. Mohit K.Ray, Atlantic, 17-25.
Kashyap, V. (2015). Significance of “Home” in V. S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr Biswas. V. S. Naipaul: An Anthology of 21st Century Criticism, ed. by Ajay K. Chaubrey, Atlantic, 221-250.
King, B. (2003). V. S. Naipaul. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mann, H. S. (1984). Variations on the Theme on the Theme of Mimicry: Naipaul’s The Mystic Masseur and The Suffrage of Elvira. Modern Fiction Studies, 30(3), 467-485. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26281242
Maxey, R. (2012). South Asian Atlantic Literature, 1970-2010, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Mustafa, F. (1995). V. S. Naipaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naipaul, V.S. (1958). The Suffrage of Elvira, London: Andre Deutch.
Naipaul, V. S. (1961). A House for Mr. Biswas, London: Picador.
Naipaul, V.S. (1967). The Mimic Men, London: Picador.
Naipaul, V.S. (1976). The Adventures of Gurudeva and Other Stories, London: Picador.
Owens, R. J. (1962). Review. Caribbean Quarterly, 7(4), 217-219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40652788
Ramchand, K. (2008). V. S. Naipaul Obituary. The Guardian, August 12, 2008. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/aug/12/vs-naipaul-obituary
Ramadevi, N. (1996). The Novels of V.S. Naipaul: Quest for Order and Identity, New Delhi: Prestige Books.
Rao, K.S.N. (1968). The Mimic Men by V. S. Naipaul. Books Abroad, 42(1), 167. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40122301
Rath, S. P. (2001). Two Spheres of Darkness: The [Dis] Indigenization of V. S. Naipaul. Journal of Caribbean Literatures, 3(1), 163-176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40986120
Roberts, R. S. (1995). Sir Vidia Naipaul’s Revolutionary Truth. Clarence Thomas and the Tough Love Crowd: Counterfeit Heroes and Unhappy Truths, NYU Press, 173-193.
Royle, N. (2003). Jacques Derrida. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Said, E. W. (2000). Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Harvard. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=merq6HPXPm8C&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Singh, V. (2005). A Journey of Rejection: V. S. Naipaul’s The Mimic Men. V. S. Naipaul: Critical Essays, ed. Mohit K. Ray, Atlantic, 156-166.
Singh, M. I. (1998). V. S. Naipaul, Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
Sharma, M. (2015). V. S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas: An Incessant Quest for Identity and Independence. V. S. Naipaul: An Anthology of 21st Century Criticism, ed. Ajay K. Chaubrey, Atlantic, 206-220.
Shojaan, B. (2015). A Postcolonial Survey of “A House for Mr. Biswas” by V. S. Naipaul. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 72-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.72
Spivak, G. C. (1994). Responsibility. Boundary 2, 21(3), 19-64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/303600
Thieme, J. (2001). Post-colonial Con-Texts: Writing Back to the Canon. Continuum.
Udofia, J. (2013). The History and Shaping of Caribbean Literature. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 56-62.
Walder, D. (2003). ‘How is it going, Mr. Naipaul?’ Identity, memory and the Ethics of Post-Colonial Literatures. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 38(3), 5-18.