"Objective realism," ethnographic cinema, and the classical model of visual-anthropological research
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examined the emergence and evolution of approaches within the classical model of visual-anthropological research, known as "objective realism," which is closely associated with ethnographic cinema. The study investigated the origin of ethnographic cinema, the first theoretical programs in anthropology, and cinematographic experiences. The main aspects of Vertov's "Cine Eye" theory were explored in the context of objectivism and philosophical ideas of positivism that formed the foundation of visual-anthropological investigations in the early twentieth century. The article considered Bazin's theory of the cinematograph of reality, attempted to implement visualization without an image consistently, and led to utopian ideas within the framework of visual anthropological theory. The principle of the "detached observer" and the technique of autochthonous interpretations, exemplified by the works of Mead and Bateson, were also analyzed, ultimately forming the classical model in visual-anthropological research. The study entailed a thorough literature review and analysis of primary sources to understand the evolution of visual anthropology's approaches. The findings suggested that the classical model of visual-anthropological research, which emphasized detached observation and autochthonous interpretations, had influenced ethnographic cinema and visual anthropology. The results presented could be used to inform and develop the methodology of future visual-anthropological research. The research implications were significant for visual anthropologists and filmmakers alike, as they provided a historical and theoretical grounding for the practice of ethnographic cinema and visual anthropology, contributing to the further development of this field.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Aleksandrov, E. (2018). The role of documentary filmmaking. EtnoAntropologia, 6(1), 63-100. https://rivisteclueb.it/index.php/etnoantropologia/article/view/276.
Alexander, N. (2017). Margaret Mead Film Festival: Four Decades of World Picture(s). In M.-P. Peirano & A. Vallejo (Eds.), Film Festivals and Anthropology (pp. 165-178). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bazin, A. (1996). Bazin at work: Major essays & reviews from the forties and fifties. In B. Cardullo & A. Piette (Trans.), Routledge.
Bazin, A. (2009). The Evolution of the Language of Cinema. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (7th ed., pp. 41-53). Oxford University Press.
Bazin, A. (2018). André Bazin: Selected Writings 1943-1958. In T. Barnard (Trans.). Caboose books in Montreal, Quebec.
Beattie, K. (2004). Constructing and Contesting Otherness: Ethnographic Film. In Documentary Screens (pp. 44–62). Palgrave.
Chakraborty, M., Das, K., & Mukherjee, K. (2023). Visual Anthropology: A Systematic Representation of Ethnography. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 95-110.
Chio, J. (2021). Visual Anthropology. In F. Stein (Ed.), The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/visual-anthropology.
Coover, R. (2009). On Vérité to Virtual: Conversations on the Frontier of Film and Anthropology. Visual Studies, 24(3), 235-249.
Dalle Vacche, A. (2020). André Bazin’s Film Theory: Art, Science, Religion. Artium Quaestiones, (31), 191–207.
Debray, R. (2000). Introduction à la médiologie. PUF, 240. ISBN: 978-2-13-050105-3.
Durrington, M. (2013). Ethnographic film. In J. L. Jackson Jr. (Ed.), Anthropology: Oxford bibliographies online. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0110.xml.
Elsaesser, T., & Hagener, M. (2015). Film Theory: An Introduction through the Senses (2nd ed.). Seans Publ.
Friedman, P. K. (2017). Do we even need to define ethnographic film? Savage Minds (blog). https://savageminds.org/2017/07/20/do-we-even-need-to-define-ethnographic-film/.
Golovnev, I. A. (2019). Visual Anthropology of Dziga Vertov. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 64(4), 1386–1403.
Gray, G. (2010). Cinema: A Visual Anthropology. Berg.
Grimshaw, A. (1999). The Eye in the Door: Anthropology, Film and the Exploration of Interior Space. In M. Banks & H. Morphy (Eds.), Rethinking Visual Anthropology. Yale University Press.
Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2015). The ethnographic turn – and after: A critical approach towards the realignment of art and anthropology. Social Anthropology [Anthropologie Sociale], 23, 418-434.
Groo, K. (2019). Bad film histories: Ethnography and the early archive. University of Minnesota Press.
Heider, K. G. (2006). Ethnographic Film: Revised Edition. University of Texas Press.
Henley, P. (2013). From Documentation to Representation: Recovering the Films of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. Visual Anthropology, 26, 75-108.
Henley, P. (2020a). Beyond Observation: A History of Authorship in Ethnographic Film. Manchester University Press.
Henley, P. (2020b). The Long Prehistory of Ethnographic Film. In Beyond Observation: A History of Authorship in Ethnographic Film (pp. 28-76). Manchester University Press.
Henly, P. (1989). Signs of Life: Teaching Visual Anthropology in Britain. In P. Chiozzi (Ed.), Teaching Visual Anthropology (pp. 41-53). II Sedicesimo.
Hicks, J. (2007). Dziga Vertov: Defining Documentary Film. St. Martin's Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Luvaas, B. (2019). The Camera and the Anthropologist: Reflections on Photographic Agency. Visual Anthropology, 32, 76-96.
Marcum, A. J. (2015). Thomas Kuhn's Revolutions: A Historical and an Evolutionary Philosophy of Science? Bloomsbury.
Mead, M. (2003). Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words. In P. Hockings (Ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology (3rd ed., pp. 3-10). Mouton de Gruyter.
Michelson, A. (Ed.). (1984). Kino‐Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov. In K. O'Brien (Trans.). University of California Press.
Miller, T. (2021). Intervals of Transition: Dziga Vertov’s The Man with a Movie Camera. In S. W. Klein & M. V. Moses (Eds.), A Modernist Cinema: Film Art from 1914 to 1941 (pp. 143-152). Oxford University Press.
Myslavskyi, V., Chmil, G., Bezruchko, O., & Cherkasova, N. (2020). From "The Eleventh Year" to "The Man with a Movie Camera": conceptual search of Dziga Vertov. Media Education, 60(3), 507-514.
Pavlova, O. (2022). Visual Anthropology: Formation Stages and Basic Elements of Analysis. NaUKMA Research Papers History and Theory of Culture, 5, 47-53.
Pecheranskyi, I. P. (2022). Cultural relativism as a methodological approach within the American anthropological tradition of studying culture (late 19th century - 1970s of 20th). Issues of cultural studies, (39), 78-91.
Penfold, C. (2013). Elizaveta Svilova and Soviet documentary film. University of Southampton, Faculty of Humanities, Doctoral Thesis.
Pink, S. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: engaging the senses. Routledge.
Putnam, H. (1995). Philosophy and our Mental Life. In P. K. Moser, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), Contemporary Materialism: A Reader (1st ed., pp. 127-137). Routledge.
Raheja, H. M. (2007). Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and "Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)". American Quarterly, 59(4), 1159-1185.
Ruby, J. (1996). Visual Anthropology. In D. Levinson & M. Ember (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology (Vol. 4, pp. 1345-1351). Henry Holt and Company.
Schäuble, M. (2018). Visual anthropology. In H. Callan (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://www.anthro.unibe.ch/e40416/e96353/e96354/files735749/Visualanthropology2018_ger.pdf.
Skare, R. (2016). «Nanook of the North» From 1922 to Today. The Famous Arctic Documentary and Its Afterlife. Peter Lang.
Srivastava, S. (2022). Visual anthropology: Changing roles in fieldwork. International Journal of Modern Anthropology, 17(2), 843-871.
Stern, R. A. (2011). Collaborative ethnographic film: A workshop case study. Portland State University McNair Scholars Online Journal, 5, 235-256. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1112&context=mcnair.
Sullivan, G. (2002). Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, and Highland Bali. Fieldwork Photographs of Bayung Gede, 1936-1939. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 24(3/4), 548-548.
Sviličić, N. (2011). History and future of visual anthropology. Collegium antropologicum, 35(1), 187-192.
Sztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia wizualna: fotografia jako metoda badawcza. Wyd. Naukowe PWN.
Totten, P. (2016). History, Form, and Relevance in Ethnographic Film. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328828120_History_Form_and_Relevance_in_Ethnographic_Film.
Vannini, P. (Ed.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of ethnogrpahic film and video. Routledge.
Venbrux, E. (2014). A history of art from the Tiwi Islands: The source community in an evolving museumscape. Les actes de colloques du musée du quai Branly Jacques Chirac, (4).
Worth, S. (1980). Margaret Mead and the Shift from "Visual Anthropology" to the "Anthropology of Visual Communication". Communication, 6(1), 15-22.