Aesthetics and semiotics in 21st century visual communications: Pedagogical and sociocultural aspects
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this article is to investigate the interplay of aesthetics and semiotics in 21st century visual communications, focusing on the pedagogical and sociocultural aspects that shape our understanding and interpretation of visual media. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to explore the theoretical foundations of aesthetics and semiotics, followed by an analysis of contemporary visual communications from various sources, including digital media, advertising, and art. The study also analyzed the pedagogical implications of incorporating aesthetics and semiotics in educational settings and the broader sociocultural impact of these concepts in the 21st century. The analysis revealed that aesthetics and semiotics are closely intertwined in visual communications, with both elements contributing to the way messages are perceived and interpreted in diverse contexts. The importance of these concepts in contemporary society was also evident, highlighting their relevance from both pedagogical and sociocultural perspectives. Moreover, the study identified potential benefits in incorporating aesthetics and semiotics in educational settings, as they foster critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of visual media. The findings of this article have significant implications for educators and policymakers, suggesting that the integration of aesthetics and semiotics in curricula can enhance students' ability to engage with and interpret visual media in the digital age. Additionally, recognizing the sociocultural significance of these concepts can help inform policies and practices aimed at promoting visual literacy and fostering a more profound understanding of contemporary visual communications.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Arnheim, R. (1982). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley.
Borgerson, J. L., & Schroeder, J. E. (2018). Making skin visible: how consumer culture imagery commodifies identity. Body & Society, 24(1-2), 103-136.
Braslauskas, J. (2021). Developing intercultural competences and creativity: The foundation for successful intercultural communication. Creativity studies, 14(1), 197-217.
Brown, S. (2016). Brands and branding. Brands and Branding, 1-296.
Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: an examination of the millenniallearner. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 19-47.
Burke, E. (1757). A Vindication of Natural Society, or, a View of the Miseries and Evils Arising to Mankind from Every Species of Artificial Society. A Letter to Lord. R. and J. Dodsley, and sold (Digitized on 11 Apr 2017), 106.
Buschgens, M., Figueiredo, B., & Rahman, K. (2019). How brand visual aesthetics foster a transnational imagined community. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2268-2292.
Chang, C. Y. (2014). Visualizing brand personality and personal branding: case analysis on Starbucks and Nike's brand value co-creation on Instagram. The University of Iowa.
Christelle, K. (2012). The translation of advertisements: issues of semiotics, symbolism and persuasion (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Johannesburg, February 2012. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39670913.pdf.
Cooper, R. G. (2011). Perspective: The innovation dilemma: How to innovate when the market is mature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 2-27.
De Saussure, F. (1916). Nature of the linguistic sign. Course in general linguistics, 1, 65-70.
Doucett, E. (2008). Creating your library brand: communicating your relevance and value to your patrons. American Library Association.
Eco, U. (1976). Peirce's notion of interpretant. MLN, 91(6), 1457-1472.
Ferguson, J. P., Tytler, R., & White, P. (2022). The role of aesthetics in the teaching and learning of data modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 44(5), 753-774.
Fu, L. (2000). Visual Communication Across Cultures. University of Canberra.
Gough, P., & Read, J. (2021). Crossing the Line: from Alley to Gallery. AUB The Gallery, 1-135. https://aub.ac.uk/latest/crossing-the-line.
Grieco, L., Tan, J., Teague, L., & Trinidad, A. (2018). The Other Office 3: Creative Workplace Design (Vol. 3). Frame Publishers.
Haenlein, M., Anadol, E., Farnsworth, T., Hugo, H., Hunichen, J., & Welte, D. (2020). Navigating the New Era of Influencer Marketing: How to be Successful on Instagram, TikTok, & Co. California Management Review, 63(1), 5-25.
Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A., & Burgess, J. (2013). Visual literacy standards in higher education: New opportunities for libraries and student learning. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(1), 61-89.
Kant, I. (1790). Über eine Entdeckung, nach der alle neue Critik der reinen Vernunft durch eine ältere entbehrlich gemacht werden soll. Nicolovius (Digitized 14 Oct. 2008), 126.
Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J. B. (2009, April). User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 729-738).
Köksal, F. N. (2022). Metaphoric Representation and Aesthetic in Advertising. In Mind and Matter-Challenges and Opportunities in Cognitive Semiotics and Aesthetics. IntechOpen.
Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269-298.
Lindstrom, M. (2008). Brand sense: Sensory secrets behind the stuff we buy. Simon and Schuster.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The right to look. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 473-496.
Mitchell, W. J. (2005). There are no visual media. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 257-266.
Murphy, R., & Jackson, S. (2011). Bodies-as-image? The body made visible in magazine love your body content. Women's Studies Journal, 25(1).
Murray, D. P. (2013). Branding “real” social change in Dove's Campaign for Real Beauty. Feminist Media Studies, 13(1), 83-101.
Norman, D., & Tognazzini, B. (2015). How Apple is giving design a bad name. Co. Design.
Opara, E., & Cantwell, J. (2013). Best Practices for Graphic Designers, Color Works: Right Ways of Applying Color in Branding, Wayfinding, Information Design, Digital Environments and Pretty Much Everywhere Else. Rockport publishers.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company.
Puppin, G. (2018). Happiness ‘with a Chinese Taste’: An Interpretive Analysis of CCTV’s 2014 Spring Festival Gala’s Public Service Announcement (PSA)‘Chopsticks’(Kuaizi pian)’. Chinese Discourses on Happiness, edited by Gerda Wielander and Derek Hird, 64-85.
Sachs, J. (2012). Winning the story wars: Why those who tell (and live) the best stories will rule the future. Harvard Business Press.
Sharma, S., Agarwal, S., Suresh, T., Nakov, P., Akhtar, M., & Charkraborty, T. (2022). What do you MEME? Generating Explanations for Visual Semantic Role Labelling in Memes. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.00715.
Si, M., Toro, S., & Hum, Y. (2020). The Atmosphere of Infinity Mirrored Room (A Work of Yayoi Kusama) as the Branding of Museum Macan in Jakarta. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 10(2), 37-42.
Stoeva, M. (2017). Emotional Branding Online: Case study: Nike. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/136114/Stoeva_Margarita_Emotional_Branding_Online.pdf?sequence=1.
Tascón, S. M. (2018). Visual communication for social work practice: Power, culture, analysis. Routledge.
Wang, X., & Haapio-Kirk, L. (2021). Emotion work via digital visual communication: A comparative study between China and Japan. Global Media and China, 6(3), 325-344.
Zettl, H. (2016). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics. Cengage Learning.
Zhong, M. (2021). Study of digital painting media art based on wireless network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1-11.