Synergy of design, culture, and innovation in pedagogy: New horizons for education
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the synergy between design, culture, and innovation in pedagogy and examine its impact on educational outcomes and the development of new horizons for education. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques. An extensive literature review was conducted to establish a theoretical foundation, while case studies of different educational institutions and settings were examined to gather insights into the practical application of design, culture, and innovation in pedagogy. Finally, expert opinions and panel discussions were analyzed to further enrich the understanding of the topic. The study revealed that the synergy of design, culture, and innovation in pedagogy fostered a more immersive and engaging learning experience for students. This interdisciplinary approach contributed to the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration skills, while also promoting cultural appreciation and understanding. The findings of this research have practical implications for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers in the realm of education. By integrating design, culture, and innovation into pedagogical processes and strategies, education stakeholders can enhance the overall quality of teaching and learning experiences, better preparing students for the challenges of the 21st century. The synergy of design, culture, and innovation in pedagogy offers new horizons for education, opening doors for the development of more engaging, relevant, and culturally inclusive learning environments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Banks, J. A. (2006a). Improving race relations in schools: From theory and research to practice. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 607-614.
Banks, J. A. (2006b). Race, culture, and education: The selected works of James A. Banks. Routledge.
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133.
Behrend, T. S., Ford, M. R., Ross, K. M., Han, E. M., Peters Burton, E., & Spillane, N. K. (2014). Gary and Jerri-Ann Jacobs High Tech High: A case study of an inclusive STEM-focused high school in San Diego, California. OSPrI Report, 3.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
Brown, G. T. (2019, June). Is assessment for learning really assessment? In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4, p. 64). Frontiers Media SA.
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines. http://udlguidelines.cast.org.
Cuban, L. (2001). How can I fix it?: Finding solutions and managing dilemmas: An educator's road map. Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). The determination of ultimate values or aims through antecedent or a priori speculation or through pragmatic or empirical inquiry. Teachers College Record, 39(10), 471-485.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
Fullan, M. (2011). Whole system reform for innovative teaching and learning. Microsoft-ITL Research (Ed.), Innovative Teaching and Learning Research, 30-39.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116.
Gay, G., & Howard, T. C. (2000). Multicultural teacher education for the 21st century. The teacher educator, 36(1), 1-16.
Goduscheit, R. C., Khanin, D., Mahto, R. V., & McDowell, W. C. (2021). Structural holes and social entrepreneurs as altruistic brokers. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(2), 103-111.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153.
Irizarry, J. L. (2022). Integrating mindfulness in public and nonprofit education programs to foster social equity. Public Integrity, 24(4-5), 504-516.
Irwin, V., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., et al. (2021). Report on the Condition of Education 2021. NCES 2021-144. National Center for Education Statistics.
Kim, J., & Maloney, E. J. (2020). Learning innovation and the future of higher education. JHU Press.
Kolko, J. (2010). Sensemaking and Framing: A Theoretical Reflection on Perspective in Design Synthesis. In Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010. Montreal, Canada: DRS Digital Library.
Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., & Karjalainen, T. (2009). The Finnish education system and PISA. Ministry of Education, Publications 2009:46. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-485-779-6
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
Luschei, T. F., & Soto-Peña, M. (2019). Beyond achievement: Colombia’s Escuela Nueva and the creation of active citizens. Educational alternatives in Latin America: New modes of counter-hegemonic learning, 113-141.
McLoughlin, C. (2001). Inclusivity and alignment: Principles of pedagogy, task and assessment design for effective cross‐cultural online learning. Distance Education, 22(1), 7-29.
Metu, R. I. (2005). A study of Virtual High Tech High program adoption in three California suburban high schools (pp. 1-231). Alliant International University, San Diego.
Moberg, S., Muta, E., Korenaga, K., Kuorelahti, M., & Savolainen, H. (2020). Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 100-114.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory (Vol. 1, pp. 703-732). New York: Wiley.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, (p. 228). Alexandria, VA.
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf.
Schneider, M. (2003). Linking School Facility Conditions to Teacher Satisfaction and Success. Educational Facilities, Washington, DC. ERIC Publications. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480552.pdf.
Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Corwin Press.
Siemens, G. (2005). Learning development cycle: Bridging learning design and modern knowledge needs. Elearnspace everything elearning, 48(9), 800-809.
Sylvest, M., & Sønderstrup-Andersen, H. H. (2022). Social affordances and the architectural design:-a case study of a central stairway. Frontiers of Architectural Research.
Tanner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of educational administration, 38(4), 309-330.
Tanner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of educational administration, 38(4), 309-330.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. McGraw-Hill.
Uline, C., & Tschannen‐Moran, M. (2008). The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55-73.
Ustun, U., & Eryilmaz, A. (2018). Analysis of Finnish Education System to Question the Reasons behind Finnish Success in PISA. Online Submission, 2(2), 93-114.
Utecht, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Becoming Relevant Again: Applying Connectivism Learning Theory to Today's Classrooms. Critical Questions in Education, 10(2), 107-119.
Villar, R. (1995). El programa Escuela nueva en Colombia. Revista Educación y pedagogía, (14-15), 357-382.
Walden, R. (2009). Schools for the Future. Design Proposals from Architectural Psychology. Cambridge, Göttingen: Hogrefe&Huber.
Wilson, S. E., & Zamberlan, L. (2017). Design pedagogy for an unknown future: a view from the expanding field of design scholarship and professional practice. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(1), 106-117.