Aspects of graphology in the construction of selected Kiswahili children’s novels
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Graphology has today dominated children’s literature making it look like an amorphous and an ambiguous creature with its relationship to its audience. Children lack the required knowledge and skills to associate meaning to the stylistic devices in use. This, however, means that children’s literature has undergone a series of transformations and it appears that in the process of its transformations, it has been affected and it has equally affected its representation as well as the socialization of children as manifested in five (5) purposively selected Kiswahili children’s novels of Nyumba ya Sungura (2012), Hadithi ya Mamba (2009), Harusi ya Mwanasungura (2006), Usicheze na Moto (2003) and Dani na Wezi wa Toyota (2015).This is so because a keen look at the five (5) literary texts confirms a lot of graphological dominance which has presented an avenue for debates and radical shifts in the scholarship in the discipline of children’s literature. With Leech & Short’s (1981) Stylistics and Rosenblatt’s (1939) Readers Response theories Rosenblatt (1939), this paper attempted to highlight and re-examine some of the graphological aspects used in the construction of children’s literature with a focus on selected novels and how those graphological features impact on the readers. It established that graphological aspects enhance thematic foregrounding in children’s literature besides giving those texts some aesthetic appeal resulting into ideal comprehension.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Adegoju, A. (2008). “Graphology as a signifying system in the University of Ibadan Official
Bulletin”. In Atoye, R.O (Ed.) Papers in English and Linguistics, 9.
Akanwa, P. C. (2017). Children’s Literature in the School Library as a Correlate of Child
Development. Department of Library and Information Science, Imo State University,
Owerri Journal of Nigerian Languages and Culture, 17(1), 166-184.
Alotaibi, A. Z. (2017). Effects of Line Spacing on Reading Performance of Normally Sighted
and Simulated Visually-Impaired Subjects: A Pilot Study Using Arabic Words King Saud University. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Global Journal of Health Science, 9(8).
Bracey. D. & Lieta, P. (2008). Nyumba ya Sungura. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Ltd.
Bracey. D. & Lieta, P. (2009). Hadithi za Mamba. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Ltd.
Chukwu, E. (2010). Graphological Elegance of English Punctuation Notations. Journal of Religion and Human Relations, Juzuu, 1(3).
Duyan, F. (2016). A research on the effect of classroom wall colours on student’s attention.
University, Istanbul, Turkey.faziladuyan@gmail.com • Department of Architecture.
Fordonski, K. (1996). Literary Graphology or the Meaning of Font in the Novels of William Wharton. Edelson, Maria, Adam Sumera and Jadwiga Uchman eds. PASE Papers in
Literature and Culture. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the PASE Łódź 1996, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 23-28.
Hojjati, N. & Muniandy, B. (2014). The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for
Online Readability and Performance. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2014, 5(2), 161-174.
Hunt, P. (1992). Literature for Children: Contemporary Criticism. New York: Routledge.
Hunt, P. (1999). (Editor). Understanding Children’s Literature: Key essays from the International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. London: Routledge.
Jakobson, R. (1961). ‘Closing statement: linguistics and poetics’ in Sebeok, T. A. (1961),
-77, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
Kluck, S. (1972). Selecting Literature for the Preschool Child. Ouachita Baptist University. Scholarly Commons, @ Ouachita.
Lauchman, R. (2010). Punctuation at Work: Simple Principles for Achieving Clarity and Good Style.
Leech, G. N. & Short, M. H. (1981). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. New York: Longman Group Limited.
Lundin, A. (2004). Constructing the Canon of Children’s Literature Beyond Library Walls and Ivory Towers. New York: Routledge.
Ngugi, Y. P. (2003). Usicheze na Moto. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.
Ngugi, Y. P. (2015). Dani na Wezi wa Toyota. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Ltd.
Nordquist, R. (2019). J. Bridges in a letter to Thomas Hearne, May 25, 1723. Oxford: Historical
Society Publications.
Oluwakemi, O. & Omoniyi, T. (2015). Colour in Learning: It’s Effect on the Retention Rate of
Graduate Students. University,Ago-Iwoye,Nigeria,Department of Science and Technology Education, Olabisi Onabanjo. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(14), Retrieved from www.iiste.org
Schneider, J. J. (2016). “The Inside, Outside, and Upside Downs of Children’s Literature: From Poets and Pop-ups to Princesses and Porridge”. University of South Florida.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. London: Routledge.
Waihiga, G. (2006). Harusi ya Mwanasungura. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Ltd.