Translation at crossroads-translating the untranslatable in English-Lubukusu advertisements

Authors

  • Rashid Mutacho Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya
  • Benard Mudogo Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya
  • Lucy Mandilla Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya

Abstract

This paper applies Skopos Theory in the analysis of “the untranslatable” in the translation of English advertisements into Lubukusu. Translation is a process by which meaning and information of a given text in one human language which is the source language (SL) is produced in another human language, the target language (TL).The central issue in translation is equivalence-sameness of the SL and TL. However, there are some items in the source language which do not always attain that degree of sameness in the TL. Those items are often referred to us “untranslatable or non-equivalents” and they form the basis of this paper. Adopting Analytical design, the paper established that there are two types of non-equivalents in the translation of English advertisements into Lubukusu namely; cultural and linguistic non-equivalents. Further, under linguistic non-equivalence, the study reveals three factors which hamper equivalence; words that share different semantic fields, words which lack hyponyms in the target language and words with different senses in the ST and TT.  The findings of this paper would be of help and use to translators who wish to translate advertisements texts and to students and trainee translators who wish to acquire knowledge and awareness of the challenges encountered in the translation of advertisements.

Dimensions

Baker, M. (1992). In other words. London: Routledge

Bolinger, D. and Sears, D. ( 1968) Aspects of Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Bond, F.,(2005) Translating the untranslatable. A solution to the problem of generating English determiners.

Bassnet, H, S. (2002). Translation studies. (3rd edition). London: Routledge.

Catford, John C., 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: an Essay on Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, London.

Ghazala, Hasan, 2004. Essays in Translation and Stylistics. Dar El-Ilm Lilmalayin, Beirut.

Giménez, A. P. (2005). Translation-Strategies Use: A Classroom-Based Examination of Baker’s Taxonomy. Translators' Journal, Vol 50, No 1, p. 294-311.

Mudogo, B. A, (2017) Word level strategies used to attain Functional Lukabras Equivalence in the translation of Mulembe FM Luhya newscasts. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Maseno University.

Musyoka, E.N. and Ireri, H.K. (2019) Types of Non-Equivalence in the Kĩkamba Bible Translation. Open Access Library Journal, 6: e5721. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105721

Nababan, Rudolf. M, et al.: Pustaka Pelajar, Cet. 3.

Newmark, P. (1988). Translation theory: General remarks: Meaning and significance. Hertford Shine: Prentice Hall International.

Newmark, P. (2003). A Textbook for translation. Longman: Prentice Hall International

Pham, B. T (2010). Strategies to deal with Non-equivalence at the word level. Graduation Thesis: University of Hanoi.

Reiss, K. (1989) “Text types, translation types and translation assessment”, translated by Chesterman, A. in Chesterman, A. (ed.) (1989) Readings in Translation Theory, Helsinki: Finn Lectura.

Samuelsson-Brown, Geoffrey, (2010) A Practical Guide for Translator, Great Britain: Short Run Press, 5th edition.

Vermeer, H. (1996). A Skopos Theory of Translation: Some Arguments For and Against. Heidelberg: Textcon Text Verlag

Wangia, J. I. (2003). Aspects of mistranslation in the 1951 Lulogooli Bible. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Kenyatta University.

Published

2021-12-10

How to Cite

Mutacho, R., Mudogo, B., & Mandilla, L. (2021). Translation at crossroads-translating the untranslatable in English-Lubukusu advertisements. Research Journal in Modern Languages and Literatures, 2(3). Retrieved from https://royalliteglobal.com/languages-and-literatures/article/view/704

Issue

Section

Articles