Victims and perpetrators: Negotiating the binaries in Sarah Kane’s Phaedra’s Love

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Emmerencia Beh Sih
Kelvin Ngong Toh

Abstract

Sarah Kane’s body of work remains vital in its appeal for fairness, as she discloses human predicaments in her society. Set in the house of Theseus; a contemporary royal family, Kane’s Phaedra’s Love problematizes two main concerns in contemporary British drama― class and gender― which are ambivalently interpreted. This study demonstrates how the underprivileged are treated in the mainstream society and assesses how they quest for self-hood in such states. Kane’s Phaedra’s Love represents two major groups of people in present-day Britain: victims and perpetrators. Like in the play, these sets of people exist in every society given that oppression, injustice and inequality occupy a great space. The privileged and the majority consider themselves powerful and superior to the “others”, not considering that everyone is powerful at his/her own level. The struggle between “the powerful” and “the weak” becomes a visible reality as the latter fight to negotiate space, make their voices heard, and recreate new identities for themselves. The New Historicist approach suits this context since it discusses power relations in the society as encapsulated in the play of Kane. Power circulates at different levels, and not only at the top. Characters that are side-lined by dominant philosophies in Kane’s Phaedra’s Love preoccupy themselves with constructing their identities and making their voices clearly heard.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Beh Sih, E., & Ngong Toh , K. (2021). Victims and perpetrators: Negotiating the binaries in Sarah Kane’s Phaedra’s Love. Research Journal in Modern Languages and Literatures, 2(1). https://royalliteglobal.com/languages-and-literatures/article/view/551
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Beh Sih, E., & Ngong Toh , K. (2021). Victims and perpetrators: Negotiating the binaries in Sarah Kane’s Phaedra’s Love. Research Journal in Modern Languages and Literatures, 2(1). https://royalliteglobal.com/languages-and-literatures/article/view/551

References

Alfredson, T. & Azeta C. (n.d). “Negotiation Theory and Practice: A Review of the Literature” Easypol Modules. Retrieved Nov 2016.

Darl, R. A. (1957). “The Concept of Power. System Research and Behavioral Science. New York:

Bobbs – Merrill. 201-215.

De Vos, L. & Graham S. (2010). Sarah Kane in Context. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

---. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other writings. London: Harvester.

Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance Self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kane, S. (2001). Phaedra’s Love in Sarah Kane Complete Plays. London: Methuen.

Isha, P. (2013). “Violence and the Ontological Question – Fatal Dynamics and Aggression in Sarah

Kane”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. Vol 2. Issue

, 14-19. Retrieved. Jan 2018.

Saunders, G. (2009). About Kane. London: Faber and Faber.

---. (2002). Love Me or Kill Me. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Tyson, L. (2006). critical theory today: A User Friendly Guide. New York: Routledge, 2rd edition.