Language and power relations in gendered discourse within EkeGusii: Implications on pedagogy in the Kenyan context

Authors

  • Beatrice Kemunto C. Obwoge Languages, Linguistics and Literature, University of South Africa (UNISA), South Africa

Keywords:

culture, gendered discourse, pedagogy, power relations, social construction, statutes

Abstract

This paper presents a discussion of language and power relations between men and women in EkeGusii and makes consideration with regards to how EkeGusii has constructed men and women to use language differently. Data was collected through participatory observation as well as own intuition and document analysis. The social theory is used to analyse data. Social theory is fundamental in this paper because gendered discourse is a social rather than biological construction and that social theory analyses language in society and what language use means to its users. It is recommended that EkeGusii chinsoni (statutes) for language be aligned with the Kenya Constitution in order to guarantee equal linguistic rights to both men and women. There is need for the curriculum to consider the learner’s sociolinguistic culture in order to play mitigative role in enabling girls realise equity of participation in the classroom process since school is taking over the socialization of an individual.

References

Akama, J. S., & Maxon, R. (2006). Ethnography of theGusii of Western Kenya: A Vanishing Cultural Heritage.New York:The Edwin Mellen Press.

Choti, P. (1998). Language and Hierarchy: The Linguistic Portrayal of the Gusii Woman. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Egerton University.

Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Language Sociolinguistics: New York: Longman

Gilbert, (1993).Two Careers/One Family: The Promise of Gender Quality. Newbury Park, C/A: Sage.

Obwoge, B. (2014). A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of EkeGusii Circumcision Social Varieties. M. A Dissertation. University of South Africa

Ogechi, N. O. (2003). On Language Rights in Kenya:Nordic Journal of African Studies, 12(3),

-295)

Onchoke, S. (2018). A Cognitive Linguistics Study of EkeGusii Onomastics:The Case of Metaphor. The Journal of Linguistic and Literature Studies, 6(8), 88-98.

Trudgil, P. (1973). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London.

UNESCO (1953).The use of Vernacular in Education.UNESCO Monographs on Fundamentals

of Education.No.8.Paris.UNESCO.

Vareness,Fernand de (2001). Language Rights as an Integral Part of Human Rights. MOST Journal on Multicultural Societies,3,1.

Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: MacGraw.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Language and power relations in gendered discourse within EkeGusii: Implications on pedagogy in the Kenyan context. (2021). Research Journal in African Languages, 2(1). https://royalliteglobal.com/african-languages/article/view/608

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.