Evaluating spatial and temporal changes in land cover in the riparian zone in Sironga wetland in Nyamira County, Kenya between 2009 and 2019
Keywords:
riparian zones, spatial, Sironga wetlandAbstract
This study sought to evaluate spatial and temporal changes in land cover in the riparian zones in Sironga wetland in Nyamira County, Kenya between 2009 and 2019. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. The study target population was 561 respondents. This included 11 key informants and 550 households in Nyamira County whose land borders the riparian areas from which a sample size of 151 respondents was drawn. The sample size included; 140 respondents selected through simple random sampling and 11 through purposive sampling. Questionnaires, interview schedules, observation schedules, satellite images and document analysis were used to collect data. Quantitative data collected was sorted, coded and analyzed with the help of statistical package of social scientist (SPSS) version 21. Qualitative data obtained was analyzed based on the themes drawn from study objectives and content for each listed. It is believed that the study findings will assist to improve local awareness of the importance of riparian zones and create positive perception among the riparian communities. This study could contribute in provision of data on riparian zones of wetlands in high agricultural potential areas in Kenya.
Downloads
References
Ajibola, O., Adeleke, M., Ogungbemi, A. and Ogungbemi, O. (2016).An Assessment of Wetland Loss in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 6, 1-7.
Arora K, Mickelson K, Baker L, Tierney P, Peters J. (1996). Herbicide retention by Vegetative buffer strips from runoff under natural rainfall. Transactions of the ASAE 39: 2155–2162.
Beeson CE, Doyle PF. 2010. Comparison of Bank Erosion at Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Channel Bends. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 31: 983-990
Bohn, C. &Buckhouse, J. (2005) ‘Some responses of riparian soils to grazing management in northeastern Oregon’, Journal of Range Management, vol. 38,pp. 378–81.
Christ R. (2013). Agroforestry and rural afforestation in the context of Landscape dynamics. A Spatio-Temporal Analysis. Eastern and Southern Africa Geographical Journal Vol.8
Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B. and Lambin, E. (2004).Review Article Digital Change Detection Methods in Ecosystem Monitoring: A Review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1565-1596.
Langat, P.K., Kumar, L. and Koech, R. (2019) Monitoring River Channel Dynamics Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Geomorphology, 325, 92-102.
Fincham E. (2008). Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. Am J Pharm Educ.;72(2):43.
Gichuki, N.F. (2010). Water, Environment and Development in Mountain Areas and
Surrounding Lowlands. Paper presented during Africa High Summit Conference held at UNEP, Nairobi.
Harris, S. & Kirkpatrick, J.B. (2011) The distributions, dynamics and ecological differentiation ofCallitris species in Tasmania, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 39,pp. 187–202.
Haque, M.I. and Basak, R. (2017).Land Cover Change Detection Using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques: A Spatio-Temporal Study on Tanguar Haor, Sunamganj, Bangladesh. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 20, 251-263
Houghton Mifflin, Boston A., Roath R., and W.,Krueger. (2002). Cattle grazing influence on a mountain riparian zone. J. Range Manage. 35:100–103
James, C.D., Landsberg, J. & Morton, S.R. (2009). Provision of watering points in the Australian arid zone: a review of effects on biota, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 41, pp. 87–121.
Jansen, A. & Robertson, A.I. (2001) ‘Relationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 38, pp. 63–75.
Jansen, A. & Robertson, A.I. (2005). Grazing, ecological condition and biodiversity in riparian river red gum forests in south-eastern Australia’, Proceedings of the Royal Societyof Victoria, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 85–95
Kauffman, J.B. & Krueger, W.C. (2004)Livestock impacts on riparian ecosystems and streamside management implications: a review, Journal of Range Management, vol. 37, pp. 430–38.
Kauffman, J., Krueger, W. &Vavra, M. (2007). Effects of late season cattle grazing on riparian plant communities’, Journal of Range Management, vol. 36, pp. 685–91.
Kharazmi, R., Tavili, A., Rahdari, M.R., Chaban, L., Panidi, E. and Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2018) Monitoring and Assessment of Seasonal Land Cover Changes Using Remote Sensing: A 30-Year (1987-2016) Case Study of Hamoun Wetland, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 1-23.
Kenny, S.A. (2013). Effects of grazing exclusion on understorey vegetation in river red gum forests and ephemeral wetlands in Millewa State Forest, NSW, Honours thesis, Charles Sturt University, Albury.
Kesikoglu, H., Atasever, H., Dadaser-Celik, F. and Ozkan, C. (2019).Performance of ANN, SVM and MLH Techniques for Land Use/Cover Change Detection at Sultan Marshes Wetland, Turkey. Water Science and Technology, 80, 466-477.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology, Methods and techniques 2nd Edition. New Delhi, New Age International Ltd Publisher.
Lee K, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC. (2003). Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi species riparian buffer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58: 1–8.
Lelo F, Chiuri W, Jenkins M. (2005). Managing the River Njoro Watershed, Kenya: Conflicting laws, policies, and community priorities [online] Available from: 2017 http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/water/r8323-proceedings.pdf#page=201.
Magurran, A. (2008). Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey. Princeton University Press. 179pp.
Mankin K, Ngandu D, Barden C, Hutchinson S, Geyer W. (2007). Grass-Shrub Riparian Buffer Removal of Sediment, Phosphorus, and Nitrogen from Simulated Runoff1
Marcuson, P. E. (2007). The effect of cattle grazing on brown trout in Rock Creek, Montana. Fish and Game Fed. Aid Pro. F-20-R-21-11a.
Mathooko J., Kariuki S. (2010).Disturbances and species distribution of the riparian
vegetation of a Rift Valley stream.
Medin, D. E., and W. P. Clary. 2009. Small mammal populations in a grazed and ungrazedriparian habitat in Nevada.U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Ogden, UT. Res. Pap. INT-413.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, M.E.A. (2005).Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Island Press, Washington DC.
Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources, MENR (2012) Kenya Wetlands Atlas. Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources.
Mugenda, M. O. and Mugenda, A. G, (2003) Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches African Centre for Technology Studies, Nairobi.
Mwita, J. (2013) Land Cover and Land Use Dynamics of Semi-Arid Wetlands: A Case of Rumuruti (Kenya) and Malinda (Tanzania). Journal of Geophysics and Remote Sensing, S1, 1.
Naiman R, Décamps H, Pollock M. (2007).The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications Volume 3: 209–212.
Naiman R., Décamps H. (2007). The Ecology of Interfaces. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics Vol. 8.
NEMA (2015). State of Environment Report for riparian zones in Kenya. NEMA, Nairobi.
Nicodemus Osoro, O., Obade, P. and Gathuru, G. (2019) Anthropogenic Impacts on Land Use and Land Cover Change in Ombeyi Wetland, Kisumu County, Kenya. International Journal of Regional Development, 6, 57.
Oguttu, W., Bugenyi, F., Leuenberger, H., Wolf, M. and Bachofen, R. (2008).Pollution Menacing Lake Victoria: Quantification of Point Sources around Jinja Town, Uganda. Water SA, 34, 89-98.
Okeyo-Owuor, J., Raburu, P., Masese, F. and Omari, N. (2012). Wetlands of Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya: Distribution, Current Status and Conservation Challenges. Community-Based Approach to the Management of Nyando Wetland, Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya,
Okotto-Okotto, J., Raburu, P.O., Obiero, O., Obwoyere, G., Mironga, J., Okotto, G. and Raburu, E. (2018) Spatio-Temporal Impacts of Lake Victoria Water Level Recession on the Fringing Nyando Wetland, Kenya. Wetlands, 38, 1107-1119.
Orimoloye, R., Mazinyo, P., Kalumba, M., Nel, W., Adigun, I. and Ololade, O. (2019).Wetland Shift Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques: Landscape Dynamics and Its Implications on Isimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa. Earth Science Informatics, 12, 553-563.
Owen, R., Katherine, V., & John, J. (2005). Dambo Farming in Zimbabwe: Water Management, Cropping and Soil Potential for Sustainable Farming in the Riparian zones. Universityof Zimbabwe, Harare.
Owers K., Albanese B, Litts T. (2011). Using Aerial Photography to Estimate Riparian Zone Impacts in a Rapidly Developing River Corridor. Environmental Management
Parson, A. 2011, Conservation and Ecology of Riparian Tree Communities in the Murray-Darling Basin, New South Wales: literature review, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney.
Peterson, R. (2009). A field guide to western birds, third ed. Washington. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv.Agric
Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Jimenez, C., Rossow, W.B. and Matthews, E. (2012). Changes in Land Surface Water Dynamics since the 1990s and Relation to Population Pressure. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L08403
Papastergiadou, E.S., Retalis, A., Apostolakis, A. and Georgiadis, T. (2008).Environmental Monitoring of Spatio-Temporal Changes Using Remote Sensing and GIS in a Mediterranean Wetland of Northern Greece. Water Resources Management, 22, 579-594.
Ramsar Convention. (1971). The Convention on Wetlands and Riparian zones. Held at Ramsar Iran in 1971 to discuss Wetland Conservation.
Rebelo M., McCartney P., & Finlayson M. (2009). Riparian zones of Sub-Saharan Africa: distribution and contribution of agriculture to livelihoods. Riparian zones
Ecology and Management. Vol.18No.5.
Rijsberman, F. & Silva, S. (2004). Sustainable Agriculture and riparian zones.20, 2005, from
www.iwmi.org
Robertson, A & Rowling R.,(2000). ‘Effects of livestock on riparian zone vegetation in an Australian dryland river’, Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, vol. 16, pp. 527–41.
Salemi L., Groppo J., Trevisan R, Marcos de Moraes J., de Paula Lima W., Martinelli L. (2012). Riparian vegetation and water yield: A synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 454-45
Sattler, P. & Creighton, C. (2002).Australian Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment 2002, National Land and WaterResources Audit, Canberra.
Schulz T., and Leininger W. (2015). Differences in riparian vegetation structure between grazed areas and exclosures. J.Range Manage. 43:295–299
Thomas J., Maser, and J., Rodiek. (2009). Riparian zones, Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv.Agric. Handbook. 553.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Estimating and projecting impervious cover in the southeastern United States (PDF). EPA/600/R-05/061. Athens, GA. 133 pp
Van Woudenberg A.(2005). Grazing impacts on the biodiversity of grassland riparian ecosystems: project phase I. B.C. Minist. Environ, Lands and Parks, Kamloops,
BC. Unpubl. rep. 422 pp.
Wenger S. (2009). A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and
vegetation . Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia Athens, Georgia, US from: http://www.chathamnc.org/WatershedReviewBoard.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Evans Kireki Gesora, Dennis Mamboleo, Dan Nyanika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.