Perspectives on law and justice depicted in Muroki Ndung’u’s A Friend of the Court (1994)
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the subjects of literary fiction is the law. Outside the world of fiction, law occupies a grand position and justice is underpinned by a legal process. This study sought to determine the different perspectives on Kenyan law depicted in Muroki Ndung’u’s novel A Friend of the Court. The research was guided by postmodernist literary theory, particularly Lyotard’s contestations on grand narratives, Derrida’s binary oppositions, contradictions in language use as founded in Saussurean philosophy and fiction as representation of the unconscious. Content analysis was used, relying on a close reading of the selected novel to collect primary data. Secondary data was obtained from a review of published works on law and literature, including Kenyan daily newspapers, which helped to contextualize issues in the study. In his novel, Muroki Ndung’u shows how in Kenya there is tension between politics and the law. Although law is a product of political processes, namely public debate and consensus, the processes of drafting, amendment and promulgation, implementation and enforcement of the constitution is rife with political overtones. For this reason, Ndung’u lampoons the chaotic nature of Kenya’s judicial processes in his work. The fact that his novel is politico-legal in itself is symbolic of the confusion between law and politics in the Kenya he represents in the novel. The study contributes to the body of knowledge on the relationship between literature and the law and the contest between grand and marginalised narratives.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Binder, G., & Weisberg, R. (2000). Literary criticisms of law. Princeton University Press.
Burke, D. J. (Director) (2005). Edison force [Film]. Emmett/Furla/Oasis Films, Nu Image, Millennium Films.
Brooks, P., & Gewirtz, P. (Eds.). (1996). Law’s stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. Yale University Press.
Glen, P. J. (2011). Franz Kafka, Lawrence Joseph, and the Possibilities of Jurisprudential Literature. S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ, 21, 47.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2020). The postmodern adventure: Science technology and cultural studies at the third millennium. Routledge.
Husa, J. (2021). Comparative law, literature and imagination: Transplanting law into works of fiction. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28(3), 371-389.
Luna, E. (2009). Criminal Justice and the Public Imagination. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 71-147.
Lyotard, J. (1979). The Postmodern condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Nassbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic justice: The literary imagination and public life. Beacon Press.
Ndung’u, M. (2004). A Friend of the Court. Nairobi: Focus Publishers Ltd.
Novitasari, A. R. D., & Titis Setyabudi, S. S. (2018). Bravery Reflected by Darby Shaw Character in The Pelican Brief Novel by John Grisham 1992: A Behaviorism Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Odden, K. (2017). Puffed Papers and Broken Promises: White-Collar Crime and Literary Justice in The Way We Live Now. In Victorian Crime, Madness and Sensation (pp. 135-146). Routledge.
Posner, R. A. (2009). The problematics of moral and legal theory. Harvard University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, N. (2012). Follow the reader: literature’s influence on the law and legal actors. Honneursverhandeling, University of Otago.