Analysis of face threatening acts on the faces of widows and widowers in funeral context
Abstract
This study intended to identify the acts of speakers that threaten the faces of widows and widowers in funeral condolences. The study was guided by Penelope Brown and Levinson Stephen’s Politeness Theory and Ervin Goffman’s views on politeness which deals with face issues, face threatening actions and how to save the face from such actions. Population of the study was the speakers who gave condolences to widows and widowers in selected funerals. Descriptive research design guided this study. Purposive sampling was used to identify funerals and speakers. The study employed participant observation as a method of data collection. The study revealed that; despite the fact that speakers tried as much as possible not to threaten the faces of the widows and widowers, sometimes they used words that threatened them especially when they gave complaints, advice, orders and requests to them. The study concluded that if polite language when expressing condolences in a funeral context will be embraced, it will play a big role in respecting the other’s privacy and make mourning comfortable among the AbaGusii.
References
Akama, J. S. & Maxon, R. (2006). Ethnography of the Gusii of Western Kenya. A vanishing cultural heritage. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, pp 293-316.
Billows, F. R., & Krauss, R. M (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behavior of same and mixed gender dyads. Language and communication, 8, 183-194.
Bloor,M & Bloor, T. (2007). The Practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction London: Hodder Arnold Press. ISBN 9780203775660
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Politeness! Some universal in language usage, pp. 62-135. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P.& Levinson, S. (1987) .Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. Katika E .N Goody (ed.) Questions and politenesss in social interaction, pp. 56-311. Cambridge University Press.
Buliba, A., Njogu, K. ,& Mwihaki, A. (2006). Isimujamii kwa wanafunzi wa Kiswahili. Kur. 60. Jomo Kenyatta Foundation, Nairobi.
Calhoun, C.J. (2002). Dictionary of the social sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Calhoun, C.J. (2002). Research methodologies for the creative arts and humanities: Participant observation research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cambridge (2008) Advanced learner’s dictionary (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press.
Capone, A. (2010). On progmemes again: Dealing with death. La Linguistique. (46). 3-21.
Chidimma, M.E. & Mmadike, B.I. (2016). Speech act analysis of Igbo utterances in funeral rites. Ogirisi: Anew Journal of African Studies vol (12), 2016.
Clark, Robert E. & Emily E. LaBeff. (1982). Death telling: Managing the delivery of bad news. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 23(4). 366-380.
Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language. London: Longman.
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches 3rd edition, kur.52, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), kur 124-132.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inguiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2002). Participant observation: Aguide for fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Ezeifeka, C & Ogbazi, I. (2014). Your’re responsible for his death: Widowhood in Igbo gender construction and struggle for agency in selected literary texts. International Journal of Language and Literature vol 2 (3), pp. 115-133 ISSN: 2334-234X
Fairclough, N. (2001a). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Katika R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Whr.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Fromkin, V. na Rodman, R. (1998). Introduction to languages, (6th edition). California, Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Gatambuki, M.G (2010). A cognitive linguistic analysis of Gikuyu euphemism. Tasnifu ya shahada ya uzamili Chuo Kikuu cha Kenyatta.
Gay, L.R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (3rd edition). Paris: Meril Publishing Company.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1967). On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Katika: E. Goffman, Interaction ritual: Essays on face- to-face behavior, kur. 5-46. New York: Anchor Books.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversations. Katika Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics. New York, N.Y: Academic Press.
Habwe, J. H. (2010). Dialogue drama in Kenyan political speeches and its pragmatics implications. Kenya: University of Nairobi. Nordic Journal of African Studies 19(3): pp 165-180.
Habwe, J. H. (2010). Politeness phenomena: A case of Kiswahili honorifics. Kenya: University of Nairobi. Swahili forum 17 (2010): pp 126- 142.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2003). “On the ‘architecture’ of human language.” Katika On language and linguistics. Volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, kur 1. London and New York: Equinox.
Harry, H. (1954). Language in culture: Conference on the inter-relations of language and other aspects of culture, pp 31 (118): 281-282. University of Chicago Press.
Haung, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hill, B., Sachiko, I., & Akiko, K. (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness. Quantitative evidence from Japanese anopd American English. Journal of pragmatics, 10 pp, 62, 347-371
Hobbs, P. (2003). The Medium is the message: Politeness strategies in men’s and women’s voice mail message. Journal of Pragmatics (35) 243-262.
Hymes, D. (1964). A Language, culture and society. New York & London: Harper and Row, 1964. Pp 34. Cambridge University Press: 28 November, 2008.
Josselson, R. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research: Principles and practicalities. Katika: D. J. Clandinin (Mh.), Handbook of narrative inquiry, Kur. 537-566. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kamusi ya Kiswahili Sanifu toleo la pili (2007). Oxford University Press, Kenya.
Kariithi, F. (2010). Mikakati ya upole katika matumizi ya lugha ya vijana. Tasnifu ya uzamili Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya. Imetolewa kwa http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/handle
Kenya National Bereau of Statistics, (2009). Kenya Population and Housing Census; Population and household distribution by socio-economic characteristics. Volume II.
Kinyua, G. (2015). Ukiukaji wa kanuni za upole katika Mhanga nafsi yangu: Tasnifu ya uzamili Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology. (2nd edition). New Age Technology Press.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Logic of politeness: Or minding your p‟s and q‟s. Katika C.Corum, T. Ceric Smith- Stark, & A. Wiser (Eds.), papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, vol N0. 3, September 23, 2013.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London and New York: Longman, pp. 250. Harcourt Brace.
LeVine, A. R. (1982). Gusii Funerals: Meanings of life and death in an Africa community. National Science Foundation, pp. 26-60 (BNS77-9007).
LeVine, A.R., & LeVine, B.B. (1977). Nyansongo: A Gusii community in Kenya. Six cultures series. New York: John Willey & sons.
Machira, S. (2015). Uchambuzi wa mikakati ya upole kama inavyotumiwa na wahusika wakuu katika Tamthilia ya Mbaya Wetu. Tasnifu ya uzamili katika Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Massamba, D.P. B. Kihore, Y. M. Hokororo, J. I. (1999). Sarufi miundo ya Kiswahili sanifu: Sekondari na Vyuo. Dar es Salaam:TUKI.
Mathooko, P.M. (2007). Isimu jamii: Misingi na nadharia. Nairobi: Njigua Books.
Mayer, P. (1949). The lineage principle in Gusii society. International African Institute Memorandum no. 24. London: Oxford University Press.
Muge, T. (2018). Uchanganuzi wa upole katika mazungumzo ya vipindi vya Sobetab Kapchi katika Idhaa ya KASS FM.Tasnifu ya uzamifu chuo kikuu cha Moi. The Africa Premier Research Publishing Hub. Vol 3, No.1 July 2018, Issn 2520-0577
Mugenda, O (2003) Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative aproaches; Acts Press Nairobi.
Muharrem, E. (1990). Katika: Hajar Shahhoseiny. Differences between language and linguistics in the ELT classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 3, No.2234-2239, December 2013.
Mwari, R. (2014). Mikakati ya upole katika vipindi vya runinga : Mawaidha na Bi. Msafwari katika runinga ya Citizen. Tasnifu ya uzamilikatika Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Neimeyer, R. A., & Gillies, J. (2006). Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of meaning reconstruction in bereavement. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19(1), 31-65.
Nerlove, S. B. (1969). Trait dispositions and situational determinants of behavior among Gusii children of South-Western Kenya. University of Naoirobi, Kenya.
Nkwera, F. (1989). Sarufi na fasihi ya sekondari na vyuo. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House.
Noduoushan, Salami M. S. (2013). The social semiotics of funerary rites in Iraq. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(1), 79-102.
Ochieng, R.W. (1986). Kenya’s people: People of South-Western Highlands-Gusii. Nairobi: Evans Brothers.
Ochomba, N. (2015). The effectiveness of Egesa FM in the uptake of family planning by women in Kisii county. Tasnifu ya uzamili katika Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Omosa, F. (2015). Tasfida kama mkakati wa upole: Uwiano wa tasfida za Kiswahili na Ekegusii. Tasnifu ya Uzamili katika Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Owino, M. (2011). Uchanganuzi wa matini tuele ya nyimbo za Faustine Munish: Mtazamo wa nadharia ya upole. Tasnifu ya Uzamili Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Redmond, Mark V. (2015). Face and politeness theories. English technical reports and white Papers. 2. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl-reports/2
Sara Mills (2002). Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity eds. Litoselliti L and Sunderland J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sara Mills (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kur 2, ISBN Hb 0521 810841, Pb 0521 009197.
Scollon, R and Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Ma: Blackwell publishing ltd.
Searle, J. (1976). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Cultural speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London : Continuum.
Thomas, J (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics .New York; Longman Group Ltd.
Troike, M. S. (2003). The ethnography of communication : An introduction (3rd edition). Blackwell publishing Ltd.
TUKI (1990) Kamusi sanifu ya isimu na lugha. Dar es Slaam: TUKI.
TUKI (2006) English swahili dictionary (3rd edition) .Dar es Salaam: TUKI.
Van Dijk, T. (2005). Multidisciplinary CDA. Katika Edds. Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. Methods of critical discourse Analysis: Introducing qualitative methods. London: Sage.
Walibora, K. (2014). Mbaya wetu. Nairobi: Moran (E.A) Publishers Ltd.
Walubengo, A. (2010). Suala la upole katika jando ya jamii ya Wabukusu. Tasnifu ya uzamili Chuo Kikuu cha Nairobi, Kenya.
Wamitila, K. W. (2003). Kamusi ya methali. Nairobi: Focus Books.
Wardhaugh, R. (2002). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th Edition). London: Blackwell Publishers.
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts,R. et al. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of politeness Research, Language, Behaviour and Culture, 1 (1). Kur. 9-33.
William M.K. (2005). Research methods knowledge base. Imetolewa kwa https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide
Williams, T. R. (2006). Linguistic politeness in expressing condolences: A case study. RASK: International Journal of Languages and Linguistics. Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press, 45-62.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Judy Nyaboke Nyabuto, Francis Kariithi, Eucabeth Mongare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
