Influence of visuospatial models construction and usage on college students’ academic achievement in molecular and hybridization geometries in Ghana
Keywords:
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Achievement, Traditional Method, Hybridization.Abstract
This action research study examines the visual-spatial model’s effects on science students’ performance in molecular and hybridization geometries. Although the diagnostic test revealed both groups showed similar conceptual abilities and challenges, the studies’ outcome showed that the visuospatial model’s approach to teaching the molecular and hybridization geometries enhanced the student’s conceptual understanding. The visuospatial model representations allow students to learn about the abstract subject matter of disciplines’ scientific knowledge. Therefore, the use of visuospatial models in teaching enhances students' visual imaginations and thoughts about concepts.
References
Ahiakwo, M. O. G (2002). Mathematics achievement and academic performance in
Chemistry. The Nigerian Teacher Today, 8 (1&2) 77-83.
Ameyaw, Y. & Sarpong, L. (2011). Integrating ICT in the Pedagogical Skills of Teachers in some Basic Schools in The Ga South District in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Journal of Education , 1 (1), 01-09.
Ben-Zvi, R., Elyon, B. S., & Silberstein, J. (July, 1987). Students' Visualisation of
Chemical Reaction. Education in Chemistry , 117-120.
Cartier, J., Rudolph, J., & Stewart, J. (2001). The nature and structure of scientific models. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved on 6th Januray, 2015 from www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/publications/reports/Models.pdf
Copolo, C. F., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach
molecular structure in high School Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology , 4 (4), 295-305.
Essumang, K. D. & Bentum, J. K. (2012). Man and His Environment. Cape Coast: Yaci Press LTD.
Folayan, R. A. (1985). A study of perceived difficult concepts in form five chemistry
content in Kwara State. Unpublished B.Sc (Ed) thesis, University of Jos.
Gray, J. A. (1981). “A Biological Basis for Sex Differences in Achievement in Science?” In Kelly, A. (Ed.). The missing Half. Manchester University Press.
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atom, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
Iyewaran, S. A. (1985). A study of the relationship between teachers’ behaviour and
students’ achievement. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 21 (2), 116-117.
Jimoh, A. T. (2003). Chemistry topics in the senior school chemistry curriculum as
perceived different by in-service Net Teachers. Nigeria Journal of
Educational studies and Research, 4 (1), 64-69.
Johnstone, A. (1993). The development of Chemistry teaching: A channging responds to a changing demand". Journal of Chemical Education , 70 (9), 701-705.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). "Why is Sience difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem". Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 7 (2), 75-83.
Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling teachers' voews on the nature of modelling, and implications for education of modellers. International Journal of science Education ,24 (4).
Keig, P. F. & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translational representation of the structure of matter and its relating to reasoning, Gender Spatial reasoning, specail prior knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching , 30 (8), 883-903.
Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (1997). " Multimedia and understanding: Expert and Novice responses to different representation of Chemistry phenomena". Journal of research in science teaching , 34 (9), 949-968.
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (2003). Representation and translation among
represntaions in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representaions in learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schmidt, H., Baumgartner,T. & Eybe, H. (2003). Changing the Ideas about Periodic Table of Elements and students Alternative Concepts of Isotopes and Allotropes. Journal of Research in Science teaching , 40 (3), 257-277.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. & Campbell, T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi
Experimental Designs for General Causal Inference. New York:
Houghton Miffin Company.
Sheehan, M. (2010). Identification of difficult topics in the teaching and learning of chemistry in Irish schools and the development of an intervention programme to target some of these difficulties.
Snir, J. C., Smith, L., & Ras, G. (2003). "Linking phenomena with competing models: A softeware tools for introducing students to the particular model of life. Science Education , 87, 794-830.
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical misconception-prevention, diagnosis and cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. (2001). Shifting Sand: A case Study of conceptual development as competition between alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science education , 23 (7), 731-753.
Vesilind, E. & Jones, M. G. (1996). "Hands-on Science Education Reform. Journal of
Teacher education , 47 (5), 375-385.
Wu, H. K. (2004). Exploring Visuo-spatial Thinking in chemistry Learning. Science
Education , 88, 465-492.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ALEXANDER OBIRI GYAMPOH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
