Analysis of Conversational Maxims Flouted to Achieve Verbal Humour in Churchill Show Stand-up Comedy Performances

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Nancy Chepkemoi
Simon Nganga
Mosol Kandagor

Abstract

Humour plays an important role in everyday human life. It created when language is used in a certain context to achieve humorous effects. There is an increased proliferation of verbal humour in stand-up comedies in Kenya recently. The local television industry has also invested in verbal humour to enhance their viewership. For this reason, Churchill Show, one of the verbal humour comedy events has captivated Kenyans in the last decade. Verbal humour is often created by flouting the Gricean conversational maxims. However, in Kenya, no study has currently examined the conversational maxims flouted by the comedians to create verbal humour in Churchill Show . Therefore, the study investigated conversational maxims flouted in Churchill Show to create verbal humour. The study relied on the Gricean cooperative principle and the principles of Relevance theory to explain the maxims flouted by stand-up comedians. The study adopted a descriptive qualitative research. The primary data of study comprised purposively selected utterances from stand-up comedy performances from 2011 to 2019 in Churchill Show. In collecting the data, the researcher applied attentive observation. Being a qualitative study, data analysis commenced during data collection. Content analyses of spoken words in the TV tape were transcribed. Classification of the data into maxims flouted was first done and discussed. The findings showed that the selected stand-up comedians flouted all the four conversational maxims in their utterances to create humour. As the comedians flout the maxims, they employed strategies such as irony, satire, self-deprecation, stereotypes and hyperbole to enhance their humour creation. The study concluded that the relevance theoretical framework is appropriate in explaining the inferential process that the audience apply in humour interpretation in order to achieve optimal relevance. The study contributes knowledge in pragmatics, especially the Grice conversational maxims and implicatures.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Analysis of Conversational Maxims Flouted to Achieve Verbal Humour in Churchill Show Stand-up Comedy Performances. (2023). Journal of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, 4(1), 7-. https://royalliteglobal.com/jlfl/article/view/1030
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Analysis of Conversational Maxims Flouted to Achieve Verbal Humour in Churchill Show Stand-up Comedy Performances. (2023). Journal of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, 4(1), 7-. https://royalliteglobal.com/jlfl/article/view/1030

References

Aarons, D. (2012). Jokes and the Linguistic Mind. New York: Routledge.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theory of humour. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (2017). Handbook of Language and humour. New York: Routledge.

Black, E. (2006). Pragmatics Stylistics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press Ltd.

Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cundall Jr, M. K. (2007). Humour and the Limits of Incongruity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 203-211.

Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations. A relevance-theoretic approach. Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27-47.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse. A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge.

Finch, G. (2000). Linguistic terms and concepts. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Forabosco, G. (2008). Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humour research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 45-62.

Goodman, P. (2021). Big Differences between American and British Humour. https://www.google.com/url? Sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd==&ved=2ahUKEwjP5cbGqJL6AhWOuaQKHSmQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fillumination%2F10-big-differences-between-american-and-british-humor-ca6dccedc34&usg=AOvVaw076XYByuFYHOkCjb3AzcEv

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford OUP.

Kinuu, K. C. (2013). A Pragmatic Approach to Kenyan Stand-up Comedy: A study of Erick Omondi’s performances (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Nairobi.

Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humour. An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsier Academic Press.

Morrison, M. K. (2012). Using Humour to Maximize Living: Connecting with Humour. Lanham: R&L Education.

Wilson, D. (2004). Relevance and lexical pragmatics (Vol. 16, pp. 343-360). UCL Working Papers in Linguistics.

Sudaryanto. P. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Wawrzyniuk, J. (2021). Identifying Humour in Stand-up Comedy: A Preliminary Study. Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW), 7, 86-97.

Yus, F. (2008). A Relevance-Theoretic Classification of Jokes. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 131-157.

Zhao, H. (2011). A relevance-theoretic approach to verbal irony: a case study of ironic utterances in Pride and Prejudice. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 175-182. Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma 2010.07.028