Integrating riddles as instructional resource in the Competency-Based Curriculum for Early Years Education in Kenya
Main Article Content
Abstract
The introduction of the Competency-based curriculum in Kenya has had far-reaching changes in the teaching and learning of basic education in Kenya today. Teachers, are for instance, required to adopt innovative methods of content delivery in order to enhance learners’ mastery of the content. Such innovative practices have seen teachers deploy various locally available materials as instructional resources in their classrooms. While riddles have multiple functions to play in society, this paper analyses benefits that learners will obtain in using riddles as instructional resources in Early Years Education in Kenya. Primary data for analysis was obtained from a field study conducted among learners in purposively sampled primary schools in Manga sub-county, Nyamira County. Pre-observation interviews, lesson observation and post-observation interviews were used in data collection. Thus, the authors examine various competency-based skills embedded in riddles such as creative and critical thinking skills, cognitive skills, numeracy skills, collaborative skills, and environmental awareness skills. The article concludes that riddles enhance learners’ competencies and therefore there is need to embrace them as instructional resources in Early Years Education in Kenya.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23-37.
Ben-Daniels, F. (2015). Trends in Ghanaian Children’s Literature. African Literature Today. Boydell & Brewer.
Bolak, K., Bialach, D., & Dunphy, M. (2005). Standards-based, thematic units integrate the arts and energize students and teachers. Middle School Journal, 36(5), 9-19.
Campbell, C., & Henning, M. (2010). Planning, teaching, and assessing elementary education interdisciplinary curriculum. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 179-186.
Ciecierski, L. M., & Bintz, W. P. (2015). Using authentic literature to develop challenging and integrated curriculum. Middle School Journal, 46(5), 17-25.
Collier, S., & Nolan, K. (1996). Elementary teachers’ perceptions on integration. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Culler, J. (1982). On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.
Applebee, A.N., Adler, M., & Flihan, S. (2007). Interdisciplinary curricula in middle and high school classrooms: Case studies of approaches to curriculum and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 1002-1039.
DeCorse, C. B. (1996). Current conversations teachers and the integrated curriculum: An intergenerational view. Action in Teacher Education, 18(1), 85-92.
Erlandson, C., & McVittie, J. (2001). Student voices on integrative curriculum. Middle School Journal, 33(2), 28-36.
Gelfand, M. (1979) Growing up in Shona Society from Birth to Marriage. Gweru: Mambo Publishers.
Gwaravanda, E.T & Masaka, D. (2008). Shona Reasoning Skills in Zimbabwe: The Importance of Riddles. Journal of Pan African Studies, vol.2, no.5.
Harrell, P.E. (2010). Teaching an integrated science curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and teaching assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 145.
Horner, C. & Westacott, E. (2001). Thinking through Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Hunt, P. (1994). An Introduction to Children’s Literature. OUP.
Jacques, D. (1976). Of Grammatology. Trans. G.C. Spivak. Baltimore: John Kopkins University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A rememberance of transformations past. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (1997). The logic of interdisciplinary studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
OKumba, M. (1999). Studying Oral Literature. Nairobi: Acacia Stantex Publishers.
---. (1994). Encounter with Oral Literature. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.
Shadish, W. R. (1995). Philosophy of science and the quantitative-qualitative debates: Thirteen common errors. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(1), 63-75.
Watkins, D., & Kritsonis, W. (2011). Developing and designing an effective school curriculum: Enhancing student achievement based on an integrated curriculum model and ways of knowing through the realm of meaning. Focus on College, Universities, and Schools, 6(1), 1-15.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.