The centrality of God in human knowledge

Main Article Content

Afaf Muhammad Al-Hadlaq

Abstract

The present study aims to study the inadequacy of human thinking strategies and knowledge to prove the existence of God. It highlights the contributions of early Muslim scholars in organizing human knowledge and addressing its challenges. These scholars emphasized the importance of basing cognitive perceptions on the knowledge of God and the central role of belief in His existence in cognitive research across various disciplines. This research explores the importance of God in the acquisition and development of knowledge. It focuses on the relationship between individual cognitive research, encompassing scientific, experimental, and ethical domains, and the fundamental principles that underlie it. Additionally, it examines the possibility of establishing a moral framework that is not reliant on religious beliefs. Furthermore, the research investigates the coherence of the atheistic perspective on the natural world, particularly in its utilization of scientific methods to uncover truth without considering the existence of God. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Hadlaq, A. M. (2024). The centrality of God in human knowledge. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/4jvsar54
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Al-Hadlaq, A. M. (2024). The centrality of God in human knowledge. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/4jvsar54

References

ʻAlī ʻIzzat. (1999). al-Islām bayna al-Sharq wa-al-Gharb, Maktabat al-Shurūq

al-Misīrī, ʻA (2002) al-ʻAlmānīyah al-juzʼīyah wa-al-ʻalmānīyah al-shāmilah, ʻAbd-al-Wahhāb al-Misīrī, Dār al-Shurūq, al-Ṭabʻah al-ūlá, al-Qāhirah

al-ʻUmayrī, S (1995) Ẓāhirat Naqd al-Dīn fī al-Fikr al-gharbī al-ḥadīth. Maktabat al-Riyāḍ, al-Riyāḍ

al-Jawzīyah (1995). Miftāḥ Dār al-Saʻādah., Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah – Bayrūt

al-Ghazālī, A.(1995) al-iqtiṣād fī al-iʻtiqād., Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī – Bayrūt

al-Ghazālī, A.(1995) al-iqtiṣād fī al-iʻtiqād., Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī – Bayrūt

al-Jurjānī, A. (1983). altʻryfāt., Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah, al-Ṭabʻah al-ūlá Bayrūt

al-Shahrastānī (1425). nihāyat al-iqdām fī ʻilm al-kalām. Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmīyah – Bayrūt

Ibn Rushd. (1964) al-kashf ʻan Manāhij al-adillah li-Ibn Rushd. Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī – Bayrūt

Abī Yaʻlá (1990). al-ʻUddah. ibn Jāmiʻat al-Imām Muḥammad Saʻūd al-Islāmīyah

Ambasciano, L. (2018). An unnatural history of religions Academia, post-truth and the quest for scientific knowledge. Bloomsbury Publishing

Atran, S., Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory, 5(1)

Augros, R. M., Stanciu, G. N. (1984). The new story of science mind and the universe 151”.

Barrett, J. L. 2012. The study of children’s religious belief: Born believers. Simon and Schuster has a total of 77

Benesh, E. The year 2005. The Causal Argument provides evidence for the existence of God.Christian Evidences is a book that explores the evidence supporting the Christian religion. Oxford University Press.

Barrett, J. L. (2012). Born believers The science of children’s religious belief. Simon and Schuster 77

Benesh, E. (2005). The Causal Argument Proves God Exists. Christian Evidences Christian Evidences, 64.‏f religion. Oxford University Press.

Collins, F. S. (2006). The language of God A scientist presents evidence for belief ,Simon and Schuster

Davies, P. (1988). The Cosmic Blueprint New Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe, Siman and Schuster, 1988 82

Davies, P. (1997). Physics and the Mind of God. In Mathematical Undecidability, Quantum Nonlocality and the Question of the Existence of God Springer, Dordrecht 390

Davies, P. C. W., Davies, P. (1993). Mind of God The Scientific Basis for a Rational World , Simon and Schuster 81

Davies, P. C(1984). ,God and the new physics. Simon and Schuster . 82

Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without.

Ibn al-Wazīr (1994). al-ʻAwāṣim wa-al-qawāṣim., Muʼassasat al-Risālah lil-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ, Bayrūt

Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzīyah (1416) Madārij al-sālikīn. Dār al-Kitāb al-ʻArabī – Bayrūt

Ibn Taymīyah (2015) Minhāj al-Sunnah. Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī – Bayrūt

Ibn Taymīyah, Majmūʻ(1995) al-Fatāwá Majmaʻ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibāʻat al-Muṣḥaf al-Sharīf, al-Madīnah al-Nabawīyah, al-Mamlakah al-ʻArabīyah al-Saʻūdīyah.

Ibn Taymīyah (1991). Darʼ Taʻāruḍ al-ʻaql wa-al-naql, Jāmiʻat al-Imām Muḥammad ibn Saʻūd al-Islāmīyah, al-Mamlakah al-ʻArabīyah al-Saʻūdīyah

Jastrow, R. (1978). God and the astronomers. New York: Norton

Lennox, J. C. (2009). God’s undertaker Has science buried God?. Lion Books. 80

Monton, B. (2009). Seeking God in science an atheist defends intelligent design. Broadview Press 300

Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford University Press 188، 528، 531

Nagel, T. (2012). Mortal questions. Cambridge university press 464

Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the conflict really lies Science, religion, and naturalism. OUP USA 79

Rosenberg, A., McIntyre, L. (2019). Philosophy of science A contemporary introduction. Routledge 265

Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Philosophy, 61(236), 173-192.‏

Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God. Oxford University Press.

Swinburne, R. (2010). Is there a God?. Oxford University Press 145

Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2001). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. MIT press.

Tremlin, T. (2010). Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. Oxford University Press.‏

Wilber, K. (2001). Eye to eye: The quest for the new paradigm. Shambhala Publications